The DLC/Special Edition Content Hate Thread
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Do you hate the concept of paid DLC packs?
Yes
75%
 75%  [ 142 ]
No
12%
 12%  [ 24 ]
Depends (explain in thread)
12%
 12%  [ 23 ]
Total Votes : 189

LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 02:48    Post subject: The DLC/Special Edition Content Hate Thread
I think this is one of the worst concepts in gaming history. What used to be releasing games with modding tools so people could add and modify content, is now releasing games with modding disabled and forbidden, with no editors and no support for editing, so that they could release small stupid content packs that are worst than what the community would usually do, for cash purposes.


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Sat, 30th May 2009 02:56; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
DeMoN064




Posts: 1308

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 02:52    Post subject:
Did we really need the poll? lol Very Happy Landslide voting ftw Razz

All people have to do is stop paying for content that should be free in the first place.... Problem solved. But as we know people are stupid and they will pay for anything.
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 02:55    Post subject:
Depends. If it's good stuff which is almost an expansion then yes, they're not doing anything dodgy by charging for it.

However if it's a few extra in game items and crap like that they shouldn't no.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 02:56    Post subject:
Don't worry, I'm sure Cedge will come along and preach how companies need the money, and bla bla bla.

I want this to be fair, lol. But come on, you have companies like Creative Assembly and Sega, which have said that they will cease and desist any mod that may resemble what they offer on their Special Edition and future DLC. How is that fair?
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 03:02    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Don't worry, I'm sure Cedge will come along and preach how companies need the money, and bla bla bla.

I want this to be fair, lol. But come on, you have companies like Creative Assembly and Sega, which have said that they will cease and desist any mod that may resemble what they offer on their Special Edition and future DLC. How is that fair?

Because they hold copyright. If a mod is basically a copy of their content they have a right to stop it.

But again, it depends how far they push the resemble part. There's no definitive answer to the subject as an whole.
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11335

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 03:14    Post subject:
The best example of this would be Dawn of War 2, where the devs actually removed some mod tools in retail, and Company of Heroes, where the devs dumbed down the map editor (iirc) with each patch, to make it harder for players to release content competitive of their own DLC addons.


Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 03:22    Post subject:
Yes. I'm not sure if it is still possible to add custom models to DoW2. And still, even if they manage, they are jumping through needless hoops just to do something that was possible with ease in the first game.
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 03:58    Post subject:
what happened to real expansion packs? and patches with "free" content.
Back to top
Ricky78




Posts: 400
Location: Pizza's country
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 04:01    Post subject:
It depends, the DLCs that really worth their cost are very rare, however I hate those that enable stuff already included in the game.
Back to top
suprman




Posts: 651
Location: On Your mum!
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 04:24    Post subject:
At the end of the day DLC's are what we from the old skool used to call mods, and they where always free for as long as I can remember, So it's bullshit that games companys try to monopolise on such a thing.


Disclaimer: Grammatical and spelling mistakes are purposely left in my posts to weed out anally retentive trolls.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 04:35    Post subject:
Ricky78 wrote:
It depends, the DLCs that really worth their cost are very rare, however I hate those that enable stuff already included in the game.

Not only this, but companies would punish you for unlocking superficially locked content (like with HAWX), because you see, even if you bought a DVD, a fifth of the content of that DVD is not for you to have! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 04:59    Post subject:
I dont hate it , when I look at the DLC from TombRaider first and second pack then I had good fun with those , also the DLC from GTA 4 was well worth the money.

As long for me a DLC is worth the money then im all up for it, I was very happy to read that Assasins Creed 2 is getting a DLC.

Also had fun with Prince of Persia DLC.


Last edited by ShadowX on Sat, 30th May 2009 05:48; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 05:15    Post subject:
Ehh really, what is planned for AC? Or is it something for AC2?

Edit: Also, why do I care, it's not for PC anyway, knowing Ubisoft's record. BTW, you do know why they don't release DLC for the PC, right? It's because their games don't have serials, and they can't tie the DLC pack to one person, so they won't earn enough cash.
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 05:47    Post subject:
Yes i ment Assasins Creed 2

Edited it also.
Back to top
FireMaster




Posts: 13323
Location: I do not belong
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 07:45    Post subject:
I say it depends on what game the DLC is released for, any game released by EA will probably have a DLC that should've been included in the fucking vanilla game
but the only game I see DLC is working well for so far is Fallout 3, it's only 800 MS point (with a G4WL key and any pirated game you'll get thousands of MS points easy) or you can just DL them Ripped and they're just copy and pasted into the /data folder no protection no bullshit.
Back to top
inz




Posts: 11914

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 09:09    Post subject:
I despise them. And I bet some publishers won't even consider proper expansion packs anymore. Why bother anyway: you can release lots of small packs that together make more money, but content-wise they don't amount to nearly as much work as a expansion pack would have.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 10:43    Post subject:
To be perfectly honest, I really don't hate the concept of DLC --- when it's done RIGHT!! When, like Mass Effect, Fable 2, Oblivion (ignoring Horse Armour, lol) or GTA4 - then yeah, it's a good idea. It's a way of getting out expanded content months after the game release.

Some of it is fucking DROSS and the publisher/developer should be shot (again, referring to shit like Horse Armour and Capcom's bullshit "new costumes! versus mode!!" nonsense) but as long as it's done right, and done cheaply, then I'm not too averse to it. What I will NOT do, however, not now and not ever; is subscribe to EA's bullshit "micro-transaction" policy. I ignored the shit out of it on BF-Heroes and I'm not giving those thieving fucknuts a penny for any Sims3 "store downloads"

Of course I prefer mods instead, they're free and extremely plentiful Very Happy
Back to top
Radamez




Posts: 892

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 10:47    Post subject:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Depends. If it's good stuff which is almost an expansion then yes, they're not doing anything dodgy by charging for it.

However if it's a few extra in game items and crap like that they shouldn't no.
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 10:50    Post subject:
Like everyone is saying, it depends on the DLC itself. For some devs it's a good way to add new content after release for a small price, for most publishers though it's another way to fuck gamers. Just like microtransactions. Release some bullshit content an artist created in two minutes and charge money for it. I am absolutely certain EA will make millions using microtransactions for Sims. I'm waiting for the first shooters where you have to buy the individual guns.
To be fair, the DLC's seem to be maturing. Look at what Rockstar, Bethesda and Bioware are doing.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 10:55    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
I am absolutely certain EA will make millions using microtransactions for Sims. I'm waiting for the first shooters where you have to buy the individual guns


Battlefield Heroes.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 11:08    Post subject:
Most of the time I hate them. I hate when they try to charge for menial stuff. Seeing the S3 store only made my decision not to buy it even stronger. I wanted to, but seeing that the price:content ratio is ridicilous compared to the old stuff pack system, they can rot in hell for all I care. I'll pirate the shit out of that one.

But there are a few instances when it's done right. Just look at GTA4's DLCs. They aren't pathectic car packs or cloth reskins like most other DLCs. They are full blown game missions with a new storyline, with new characters. That's they way it should be. Giving players an expansion-worth of content for an amount of money that justifies the amount AND QUALITY of content offered (not just redone S2 items like in the S3 store).


Last edited by zmed on Sat, 30th May 2009 11:09; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 11:09    Post subject:
Ehh, Oblivion? Oblivion had a crazy good expansion, Shivering Isles, which does not come under the term DRM. All the rest (aka the DLC) was meh. Smile
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 11:18    Post subject:
Knights of the Nine was pretty good too, though short and extremely limiting in who could play it, which sucked. If you were an evil, or non-lawful, character - you couldn't do the quest. Still, I kinda like *some* of the DLC in Oblivion, which added a few quests and some new items.

Either way, I think it's fair to say that when DLC is done right; all is well and good. It's only when we feel llike we're being ripped off that our fangs come out ... and rightly so! Smile
Back to top
RainyDay




Posts: 2212
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 11:46    Post subject:
I hate the idea of a DLC with passion Razz (tho i suppose i should not care about them as a hardcore pirate)


Per aspera ad astra
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:09    Post subject:
Bring Tomb Rider DLC to the PC !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top
xExtreme




Posts: 5811
Location: 43 6C 75 6A 2D 4E 61 70 6F 63 61
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:19    Post subject:
Spiderman wrote:
Bring Tomb Rider DLC to the PC !!!!!!!!!!!!!


+1 Sad

or dlc's but for free Laughing
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:22    Post subject:
DLC's for free would not happen though, depending on the DLC of course. Look at Rockstar's "Lost and Damned", a mod can never come close to that. It's a developers right to ask some money for such work.
Back to top
stemot




Posts: 1886

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:27    Post subject:
In the case of Rockstar, they are putting out great DLC (unfortunately not for PC) but they are not stopping people from modding their game, in fact, the latest patches made it easier.
Back to top
Namarie




Posts: 707

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:30    Post subject:
I am pissed about it since only 1 of the games I bought that used DLC as a selling perk actually released any.. Fallout 3.


A big huge FINGER to the rest, convinient way of selling half finished products imho.
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 12:35    Post subject:
DLC is fine when they expand a great game with tons of content, like GTA4, Midnight Club: LA and a few other games. DLC is crap when they charge 5$ for extra car or 2 rpg items or whatever.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
Page 1 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group