| Page 1 of 1 |
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
 Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 00:09 Post subject: New NAS (DS1019+) |
|
 |
So, I finally decided to get get rid of my Buffalo 441 with 4TB x4
to
Synology DS1019+
Upgrade to 16GB of RAM.
AND
5 x 10TB WD RED PRO DRIVES!!!
Gonna put everything in SHR that should leave me with 40TB of space.
Everything should be here on Saturday!
Good times ahead of me and setting everything up!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 01:20 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 02:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Well. Shit. Bought premium drives.
Feels bad man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 04:56 Post subject: |
|
|
According to the article..
"Currently, Western Digital’s WD Red 2TB-6TB drives are device-managed SMR (DMSMR). WD Red 8TB-14TB are CMR-based.""
So, WD Reds should still be good? And there is no mention of the PRO line...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 05:13 Post subject: |
|
|
@AmpegV4 I have also got newer generation I think?
WD101KFBX VS WD102KFBX
I wasn't really able to find any information what is the difference..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 09:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Redundancy in a NAS is much more important than speed.
SHR is definitely closer to RAID 5 than 4. Parity is distributed between the disks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 09:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
In an SHR Volume, you can mix and match Hard Drives and let the calculations of the SHR layer do the work. This isn’t just at the moment of installation, but anytime you like. So, if you have for example 4 x 2TB drives in an 8-Bay enclosure and at a later date add 4x 4TB drives, not only will you be able to add these larger drives of any BRAND or speed, but also get the much, much bigger total capacity made available to you. With an SHR RAID, regardless of the mixing of the drives, in terms of redundancy vs Capacity, you will only lose 1x the largest drive. Whereas in a RAID 5 if you mixed drives, ALL of them will be viewed and RAID’ed as the smallest available drive and you still only have redundancy for a single drive. So, in practice:
|
Dang, I couldn't find a definitive diagram on whether SHR used a dedicated parity drive or not (RAID4 does this and only needs same capacity as the maximum sized disk in an array). All the features above are the same, i also like RAID4 doesn't suffer striping issues i.e lose 2x disks and I lose a bunch of TV shit who cares.. it don't risk losing the entire array with striping problems of RAID5.
Side-note: My brain does not understand how the RAID4 redundancy works, I have had single disk failures and recovered all data no problems. How does 1x dedicated parity drive max size 8tb (-8tb of storage in array) restore any disk in a 50tb array 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 10:06 Post subject: |
|
|
I am interested in a NAS (or something similar) but also wish to have performance if its not entirely unpractical.
Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels I don't understand the advantage of RAID-4 vs 5. The only difference I understand is the dedicated vs distributed parity information? This means writing is a slow as one disk.
kogel mogel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 14:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| Przepraszam wrote: |
According to the article..
"Currently, Western Digital’s WD Red 2TB-6TB drives are device-managed SMR (DMSMR). WD Red 8TB-14TB are CMR-based.""
So, WD Reds should still be good? And there is no mention of the PRO line... |
You are in the green  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 18:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 23:15; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Sun, 19th Apr 2020 08:16 Post subject: |
|
|
Everything was delivered today. Ram and Drives
Started the initial setup. Decided to do SHR1 with btrsf. Seems like logical thing to do. SHR2 would take 20TB away vs 10TB for SHR1.
What I didn't know that it takes about 14 hours to initialize 1 10TB disk...for 5 drives it will be around 2-3 days before I can do anything haha
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14398
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Tue, 21st Apr 2020 13:46 Post subject: |
|
|
So..I just setup Sonarr/Radarr with torrent/Usenet and VPN integration..
I had no idea how much automation Sonarr provides . And Usenet is pretty great once you do...
Overall 10/10 purchase on everything.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 21st Apr 2020 13:52 Post subject: |
|
|
Sonarr, Radarr, Jackett, Deluge, Plex/Kodi/Emby > usenet + torrent as backup and you are invincible. Becoming mandatory with shitty carved up streaming services.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
