|
Page 1 of 1 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Tue, 20th Sep 2005 04:56 Post subject: Music. and other stuff. |
|
 |
Some new albums I've enjoyed... and not so enjoyed.
Pushing_Daisies-How_It_Makes_You_Feel-2005-XXL : Been listening to this for a bit, rock/popish, a bit of a guilty pleasure.
Hinder-Extreme_Behavior-2005-BUTT: Enjoying this album very much, a few songs seem out of place (How Long and Room) but the rest of it is excellent. Rock/Disgruntled hoarse voice rock
Franz Ferdinand - You Could Have It So Much Better With Franz Ferdinand: Like the first one I find almost the entire album to be abysmal and unlistenable, asides from a few good tracks (Walk Away comes to mind, i love this song, is it me or does this sound like jim morrison / the doors??).
Singles:
Shinedown - Save Me ... I'm a sucker for shinedown. Like the song and looking forward to the album.
Athlete - Tourist ... Change of pace, not sure how to describe it asides from alt...
Our Lady Peace - Where Are You ... enjoy the first 30 seconds. The rest of the new album is decent, pretty typical OLP
Supergrass - St. Petersburg ... Slow odd alt, but good.
Anyways... now to the other stuff!
OK so.. My playlist file size is now just approaching 45,000 songs, and winamp using classic mode is taking up *165* megs of ram. Is this normal? I don't remember it hogging this much, but I haven't made a short playlist of what I like recently (it's a bit tedious) so perhaps this is why.
Any tips on a program less memory intensive with large playlists? All I care about is the ability to sort by path and filename, as I have my files in very specific order (eg. P\Pink Floyd\Wish You Were Here\01 - Shine on You Crazy Diamond (Parts I-V) - Pink Floyd.mp3)
thanks for any help!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 17:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
i tried loading 100 songs with mediaplayer. Thing made my pc fucking slow haha
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 22:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
swtiched to foobar2000, it's very retro looking but extremely flexible and uses only 12 megs of ram for a 44,000 song + playlist. I love it. Only thing it could use is a volume bar instead of having to press + or - hehe.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 19:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
Wow.
It took me several days to realize it, but this is probably the most powerful mp3 program available on the internet. fucking amazing. takes a while to learn all the different things though.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 20:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Foobar owns.
Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Thu, 29th Sep 2005 03:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
it all depends on if you have enough time...
it uses components in a similar sense to firefox, with a lot more customizability, but you have to do some stuff manually so it all depends...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu, 29th Sep 2005 04:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
Um... Winamp?
I've always loved winamp, and the way my desktop is setup, and using the mmd3 skin, i can have everything hidden, with winamp as a bar along the top of my screen.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Thu, 29th Sep 2005 06:24 Post subject: |
|
 |
I like winamp too, and if you want a small (optical size) player it's the best.
But if you are like me and keep the playlist taking up the whole screen anyway, the almost infinite functionality of foobar makes it well worth the steep learning curve.
i'll give you a metaphor... winamp is like the most compact point and shoot digital cameras. it does what it does good but doesn't offer nearly as much features as a good dSLR which is a little bigger but if size doesnt matter, worlds better in every category.
It all depends on what you need. People content with a smaller display but less functionality will be better to go with winamp...
funny thing is, with all this stuff it can do, it still takes up less than 1/5 of what winamp was doing at the same playlist size.
I'm sorry. I just discovered all this stuff today that I never realized I could do and it's very exciting for me, the nerd that i am 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|