| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 22nd Nov 2005 15:48 Post subject: |
|
|
so you are downloading more then the isp see/controlls?
sounds 2 sweet 2 be true.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 22nd Nov 2005 16:34 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it's true...
The bandwith just can't be ignored by simply running a tool.
| Injurious wrote: | | And then Mabel tripped over a rock and landed in a well and was trapped there with Timmy. Sadly I shot Lassie so no one is saving that bitch! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
| Posted: Tue, 22nd Nov 2005 17:20 Post subject: |
|
|
Theorecially it could maybe be done, but you would certainly have a very instable connection and suffer huge amounts of packet loss. You would have to manually create the packets sequence numbers to trick the internal ISP router into thinking it isnt receiving all of the packets, when in reality your sending twice as many. Then you have the job of tricking the router into forwarding ALL of the packets anyway... which.. I couldn't figure out off the top of my head.
needless to say, I doubt anyone has actually done it. Remember though, your bandwidth is limited outside of your ISP's network via routers, not inside it. If you can trick those routers, your bandwidthless. This is how cable modem uncapping is possible, as the only constraint is on the modem and the network routers (which in most cases on a cable network have no caps).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 4th Dec 2005 16:14 Post subject: |
|
|
bump 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
