| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 17:25 Post subject: unreal engine 3.0 demo [RoboBlitz demo] |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 17:41 Post subject: |
|
|
there is already thread about it..
demo was released over week ago
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 17:52 Post subject: |
|
|
ofc..
it's just part of Unreal 3 Engine physics presentation. (no stress lay on Graphics)
works only with Intel CPU's - installer has CPU check built on it...
but works best with Intel's Dual Core one's.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
runs at like 5 fps lol 3.2ghz 9800 pro
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 18:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| Glottis wrote: | | runs at like 5 fps lol 3.2ghz 9800 pro |
9800 pro is teh weak
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 18:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| deelix wrote: | | Glottis wrote: | | runs at like 5 fps lol 3.2ghz 9800 pro |
9800 pro is teh weak |
you lolhead!
this game is not using videocard. only CPU - it needs Dual Core for good performance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 22:00 Post subject: |
|
|
Can someone post some screenshots of it plz..
I have AMD.. so I can not run it...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Dec 2005 22:09 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Thu, 22nd Dec 2005 00:32 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 22nd Dec 2005 00:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| deelix wrote: | ok.. but 9800pro is still the weak  |
No its not. I play WoW, EVE online, NFSMW, dungeons and dragons online beta, BF2, all those games on pretty much highest settings, 4x aa (BF2 only with 2x aa because huge performance drop on 4x) 4x aniso and get fps 35-100 (only in heavy WoW raids it goes down below 15 fps, but so does for people with 7800gtx's).
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCez
Posts: 357
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 03:07 Post subject: |
|
|
It runs great on my gaming laptop (50-60fps, 800 * 600) XPS GEN 2 with 6800 Ultra, 2.13 CPU, 1Gig DDR2 Ram. And around 30fps at 1024 * 768.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 03:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| SirCez wrote: | | It runs great on my gaming laptop (50-60fps, 800 * 600) XPS GEN 2 with 6800 Ultra, 2.13 CPU, 1Gig DDR2 Ram. And around 30fps at 1024 * 768. |
...
No plans for children anytime soon, 'eh? Whadd'ya get, like 20mins battery life in Doom 3 or HL2?
dyn IP addys, subnet & mac spoofs, email routing, and if all else fails, wi-fi. banned? lol, its more like brb. =p
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 04:25 Post subject: |
|
|
leeching now.
P4 2.4 @2.66
512MB PC3200 DDR, 1x512
Radeon 9600 Pro 128MB, slightly overclocked
IDK if I should even bother...
On a side note, I've been considering building a new comp around an AMD x2 chip and an ATI x1800 XL card. I'm not sure going AMD right now is a good idea, if Intel plans to have a grip on the next-gen games market. Their chips, performance/price wise, are starting to catch up to AMD, so perhaps it would be better to stay Intel? What do you think?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 23rd Dec 2005 05:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| Accelleron wrote: | | I'm not sure going AMD right now is a good idea, if Intel plans to have a grip on the next-gen games market. Their chips, performance/price wise, are starting to catch up to AMD, so perhaps it would be better to stay Intel? What do you think? |
 !!! A grip on the games? No developer will side with a chip manufacturer at all. Least not the one with the smaller market share! Look at games and video cards. Ok ATI / nvidia have better support for some games but that isn't the be and and end all. I dont think that this one sided U3 affair will continue for long anyway so AMD is the way forward really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirCez
Posts: 357
Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
