The Evil Wikipedia
Page 1 of 1
vinter




Posts: 46

PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 11:43    Post subject: The Evil Wikipedia
Everytime I try to do some school-projects using the information I find at Wikipedia, I always end up browsing other articles :/ I hate it. I just keep on reading down the main article, find a link and click it, then click the next random word etc etc until I end up reading something that hasn't got anything to do with my original goal.

Wikipedia is a curse. But god I love it...
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 11:50    Post subject:
If you reference wiki at the end of a project at my university they take off a massive amount of marks. Because anyone can put information up there and it isn't necessarily 100% accurate.

It's good for reading up on a subject, but when it comes to specifics I don't find it that useful.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
spankie
VIP Member



Posts: 2958
Location: Belgium
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 12:05    Post subject:
yeah yeah, you guys are lucky.

We had to make papers without wikipedia :'(
Back to top
TheSaint
Dalai Lama



Posts: 6586
Location: Cook Islands
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 12:23    Post subject:
wikipedia for the win Very Happy i think it rocks
Back to top
Grees




Posts: 679
Location: Over there
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 12:30    Post subject:
Wiki is like heaven for forum pundits
Back to top
s0ulse3ker




Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 13:45    Post subject:
TheSaint wrote:
wikipedia for the win Very Happy i think it rocks

I'l stick with this one Rolling Eyes


Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 13:48    Post subject:
Yeah its great for school stuff and gerneral info Wink
Back to top
Submiqent




Posts: 1213

PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 14:34    Post subject:
Grees wrote:
Wiki is like heaven for forum pundits

QFT
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 16:55    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
If you reference wiki at the end of a project at my university they take off a massive amount of marks. Because anyone can put information up there and it isn't necessarily 100% accurate.

It's good for reading up on a subject, but when it comes to specifics I don't find it that useful.


A lot of times wiki has links to the actual source at the bottom of the article, or at least provides a starting point for research (although I really did only use PubMed while in school).

Now I only read it for fun, or when I want a little more background on a news article I might be reading. lol ... encyclopedia for fun ... what I nerd I am! Razz


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
pistolshrimp
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 11007

PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 21:04    Post subject:
I had to write papers without the net. Sad

I remember I was so excited when they did away with card catalogue at the library and brought in computers.


I get trapped in the vicious information circle that is wiki too.
Back to top
Godlikez*
Banned



Posts: 2722
Location: In Your Illusions
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 21:10    Post subject:
As said, anyone can implent/add articles in Wiki and as such using it in essays/papers isnt always a good idea.


Daz99 wrote:
Will I get banned for posting a horse and a nakkid black man?

Godlikez* A Proud Muslim Through And Through.
FCC 4 LIYFE [FAT CAT CREW]
 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
PoorLeno




Posts: 999
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 21:18    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
If you reference wiki at the end of a project at my university they take off a massive amount of marks. Because anyone can put information up there and it isn't necessarily 100% accurate.

It's good for reading up on a subject, but when it comes to specifics I don't find it that useful.


Seems like you are studying some artsy-fartsy crap then. At my university - RIOT, they encourage the use, especially in the natural science department. Professors often reference wikipedia themselves as reading material.


Back to top
kumkss




Posts: 4834
Location: Chile
PostPosted: Thu, 25th May 2006 23:56    Post subject:
PoorLeno wrote:
AnimalMother wrote:
If you reference wiki at the end of a project at my university they take off a massive amount of marks. Because anyone can put information up there and it isn't necessarily 100% accurate.

It's good for reading up on a subject, but when it comes to specifics I don't find it that useful.


Seems like you are studying some artsy-fartsy crap then. At my university - RIOT, they encourage the use, especially in the natural science department. Professors often reference wikipedia themselves as reading material.


could be use as a reference. one in the many bibliography requiered. if you use only wiki, at my uni, your fucked up.
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Fri, 26th May 2006 05:50    Post subject:
I think everyone is on the same page -- you need to use primary sources when in university.

This was my holy grail while in school, and I imagine it would be the same for anyone studying life sciences ...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed

Say what you want to say about the USA's foreign policy ... but when it comes to providing research resources, they are unmatched in the world.


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Fri, 26th May 2006 12:44    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
I think everyone is on the same page -- you need to use primary sources when in university.

This was my holy grail while in school, and I imagine it would be the same for anyone studying life sciences ...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed

Say what you want to say about the USA's foreign policy ... but when it comes to providing research resources, they are unmatched in the world.


Thankyou, at least some people realise how it actually works at university. I frequently use PubMed aswell.

PoorLeno, you're talking shit. I've just finished my second year of molecular biology so I know what i'm talking about. In my university they actually encourage you to find your own primary sources, not just reference some publically editable encyclopedia. They're preparing you for a real publication/work environment, I don't know what they're doing at your uni.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
spankie
VIP Member



Posts: 2958
Location: Belgium
PostPosted: Fri, 26th May 2006 13:46    Post subject:
duh, PUBMED or Sciencedirect or >> wikipedia

but 1 uni is not another uni. Wink

There are always good and bad
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - The Bitching Session
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group