Vista ANd direct x 10. Is it True?
Page 1 of 1
inlovem




Posts: 19

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Sep 2006 22:42    Post subject: Vista ANd direct x 10. Is it True?
I heart that some effect on vista the going to use direct x 10. So also i heart that our graphics cards they won’t support direct x 10 because the hardware it won’t be compatible . is that true? I have spent a lots of money on my pc i hope . Sad By the way i put vista on my computers and the work fine.
Back to top
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist



Posts: 8374

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Sep 2006 23:33    Post subject:
Firstly, no need for the red, large, bold text.. seriously, it makes it harder to read and wont make anyone want to answer you post anymore.. *removes it for your own sake..*..

As far as I am aware vista is DX9 compatible but with it will come an update to DX making it version 10. No cards at this time support DX10 (that I am aware off).. and it will mean the need to upgrade.. However DX10 can be emulated on DX9 cards, so all is not lost.. it simply means a performance drop!

Im sure someone will correct whatever I have wrote that is not accurate.
Back to top
Pizda2




Posts: 3028

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Sep 2006 23:41    Post subject:
I was thinking of buying a GF 7950GX2 but I've been reading up on DX10 and It's due out q1 2007 right? So it would be a waist to give out 600 euros on a card that doesn't have DX10 support when it's going to be out soon.

Has ATI or Nvidia given any news about DX10 cards coming out soon?


Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Sep 2006 00:15    Post subject:
Pizda2 wrote:
Has ATI or Nvidia given any news about DX10 cards coming out soon?

nope , they wait for a stable Vista


Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Wed, 27th Sep 2006 17:02    Post subject:
Hfric wrote:
Pizda2 wrote:
Has ATI or Nvidia given any news about DX10 cards coming out soon?

nope , they wait for a stable Vista

lol like there is stable Xp Laughing
Back to top
inlovem




Posts: 19

PostPosted: Wed, 27th Sep 2006 22:19    Post subject:
sorry about my text , i wont do that again, so do you have to wait for vista in 2007?
Back to top
inlovem




Posts: 19

PostPosted: Thu, 28th Sep 2006 19:55    Post subject:
I have read that the new grafic card for ATI 1950 XTX the hardware is based on Dr x 10. also is DDR 4 !!! Is that ok for vista or should be wait?
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Thu, 28th Sep 2006 20:40    Post subject:
inlovem wrote:
I have read that the new grafic card for ATI 1950 XTX the hardware is based on Dr x 10. also is DDR 4 !!! Is that ok for vista or should be wait?

wait


Back to top
Muppet
Banned



Posts: 141

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Sep 2006 10:02    Post subject: Re: Vista ANd direct x 10. Is it True?
inlovem wrote:
( By the way i put vista on my computers and the work fine.


It will, DirectX is backward compatible. It will still work, it's just the card won't support the new functionality of DX10 - this won't stop you running anything when DX10 is installed, until the first games come up that use DX10 specific functionality as an mandatory part of the graphics, at which point you'll need a new card if you want to run them. IIRC, Crysis will be the first one that requires a DX10 compatible card.
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Wed, 4th Oct 2006 14:37    Post subject:
[sYn] wrote:
Firstly, no need for the red, large, bold text.. seriously, it makes it harder to read and wont make anyone want to answer you post anymore.. *removes it for your own sake..*..

As far as I am aware vista is DX9 compatible but with it will come an update to DX making it version 10. No cards at this time support DX10 (that I am aware off).. and it will mean the need to upgrade.. However DX10 can be emulated on DX9 cards, so all is not lost.. it simply means a performance drop!

Im sure someone will correct whatever I have wrote that is not accurate.

You won't notice a performance drop in vista (using aero) and a dx9 card, aero doesn't use any dx10 specific functions if vista doesn't detect a dx10 capable card and it'll render just fine on either (of course the newer dx10 capable cards will be faster than what we have today more pipelines and mhz etc.. thats beside the point when rendering aero though)
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Mon, 9th Oct 2006 20:46    Post subject:
ELIZ wrote:
Hfric wrote:
Pizda2 wrote:
Has ATI or Nvidia given any news about DX10 cards coming out soon?

nope , they wait for a stable Vista

lol like there is stable Xp Laughing

Umm, yeah, there is... Maybe you've forgotten what running Windows used to be like?


Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Tue, 10th Oct 2006 23:52    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:
ELIZ wrote:
Hfric wrote:

nope , they wait for a stable Vista

lol like there is stable Xp Laughing

Umm, yeah, there is... Maybe you've forgotten what running Windows used to be like?

u mean '98,omg that was nightmare Crying or Very sad
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Wed, 11th Oct 2006 16:37    Post subject:
ELIZ wrote:
Hfric wrote:
Pizda2 wrote:
Has ATI or Nvidia given any news about DX10 cards coming out soon?

nope , they wait for a stable Vista

lol like there is stable Xp Laughing


Vs. What?

Linux? One distro didn't let me even get to the install screen because I had USB2 devices (a fucking mouse) plugged in. Many take way too long to boot. They have terrible third party support. etc. etc.

With that said, what the hell is the big deal with all the ANTI MS shit. Grow up. Different people with different needs will be better suited for different OSs. I find it utterly ridiculous how single-minded people get when talking about operating systems, it's a fking joke.


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
bogo24dk




Posts: 3043

PostPosted: Sat, 14th Oct 2006 10:22    Post subject:
ELIZ wrote:
Ispep wrote:
ELIZ wrote:

lol like there is stable Xp Laughing

Umm, yeah, there is... Maybe you've forgotten what running Windows used to be like?

u mean '98,omg that was nightmare Crying or Very sad



98 wasn't a nightmare if you came from 95. I will say the most unstable systems ever made by Microsoft war 95 and ME.


Back to top
whoKnows
VIP Member



Posts: 2972

PostPosted: Sat, 14th Oct 2006 10:51    Post subject:
Nah, the most unstable and buggy version ever was Windows NT 3.5. It was really crap and prematurely released, hence the quick update to 3.51 a few months later.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Operating Systems
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group