War: EU vs. USA
Page 1 of 6 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
BearishSun




Posts: 4484

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:01    Post subject: War: EU vs. USA
I tought it might be an interesting discussions: Who would win?


I'd say EU since it would most likely become world war very soon, involving russia and china, both wanting to overthrow USA, not to mention there will be back-up from middle-eastern countries and increased terrorist attacks all over USA. They can't handle Katrina, not to mention public panic this would create. But then again, with their technologies, aircraft carriers and nukes, you never know, although germany really isn't all that far from technology viewpoint.
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23248
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:03    Post subject:
There is a good book about this by Larry Bond (Cauldron).


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:08    Post subject:
Technology > Manpower

That is why the US would win.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
TSR69
Banned



Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:12    Post subject:
I don't think this is a very useful discussion better we think how we can help the US to become much less dominant regarding global politics. The biggest threat to world peace is the US at this moment. Meanwhile i guess that European countries should start building up their armed forces and especially make sure that these forces have hightech equipment. History has always shown that if European countries cast away the things that divide them and work together we can beat the US fair and square.
Back to top
Pizda2




Posts: 3028

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:37    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
Technology > Manpower

That is why the US would win.



The best military weapons come from EU though. US has better intelligence/recon. That's why they are the strongest, war is all about intelligence.


Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:41    Post subject:
Pizda2 wrote:
The best military weapons come from EU though. US has better intelligence/recon. That's why they are the strongest, war is all about intelligence.

I disagree. The US is the pioneer in military research and development. Here in EU we just get the leftovers mostly Razz


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:44    Post subject:
Europe designs better small arms than the Americans.


Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:47    Post subject:
US designs bigger, more destructive, and more precise weapons than the Europeans. So there you go.

I don't see the debate, the US can just send over a bunch of missiles to destroys us, while they themselves have sophisticated technology to shoot down just about everything that flies in the sky. (I'm not saying we Europeans don't, but in a war their technology would be the end of us)


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 11:58    Post subject:
This is going to turn into a flame war, some people here are so arrogant and biased that they can't have a fun debate, they want their opinions to dominate thus ruining the thread and getting it closed.

But don't forget the US are trigger happy, they'll start war just about anywhere right away with out getting requried intel on the hostile areas, look at how many soldiers we lost in iraq, bush sent troops over almost right after we got hit on 9-11.


Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:03    Post subject:
You're classing everything as one Parallax. The UK designed the best sniper rifle. L96A1. You can't get much more precise than that.


Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:06    Post subject:
Jenni wrote:
You're classing everything as one Parallax. The UK designed the best sniper rifle. L96A1. You can't get much more precise than that.

If you didn't notice I am talking pre-emptive strikes. But I agree with you on the sniper rifle of course.

SpykeZ wrote:
This is going to turn into a flame war, some people here are so arrogant and biased that they can't have a fun debate, they want their opinions to dominate thus ruining the thread and getting it closed.

And SpykeZ, no reason to call me arrogant or biased because you don't agree with my opinion. I don't know what your idea of a fun debate on a potential serious issue is? Smile


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
Freakness
Banned



Posts: 3583

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:20    Post subject:
There wont be war US vs EU, because they are far too simmilar. There could be a war if EU would be overfloved by muslims in 100 years, but that war would be lost for EU, because those countries would be poor coz of muslim mentality.
Back to top
oxyeL




Posts: 7152

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:28    Post subject: Re: War: EU vs. USA
BearishSun wrote:
I tought it might be an interesting discussions: Who would win?


I'd say EU since it would most likely become world war very soon, involving russia and china, both wanting to overthrow USA, not to mention there will be back-up from middle-eastern countries and increased terrorist attacks all over USA. They can't handle Katrina, not to mention public panic this would create. But then again, with their technologies, aircraft carriers and nukes, you never know, although germany really isn't all that far from technology viewpoint.

The basic assumption of your post is wrong as the country that is most endangered by China is Russia.
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23248
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:51    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
US designs bigger, more destructive, and more precise weapons than the Europeans. So there you go.

I don't see the debate, the US can just send over a bunch of missiles to destroys us, while they themselves have sophisticated technology to shoot down just about everything that flies in the sky. (I'm not saying we Europeans don't, but in a war their technology would be the end of us)


...they buy much of their weapon technology from europe so I don't agree.


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:52    Post subject:
I think that in any case, we all lose. Smile

No matter which side will win. Everyone will be FTL!


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
BearishSun




Posts: 4484

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:56    Post subject: Re: War: EU vs. USA
mark322 wrote:
BearishSun wrote:
I tought it might be an interesting discussions: Who would win?


I'd say EU since it would most likely become world war very soon, involving russia and china, both wanting to overthrow USA, not to mention there will be back-up from middle-eastern countries and increased terrorist attacks all over USA. They can't handle Katrina, not to mention public panic this would create. But then again, with their technologies, aircraft carriers and nukes, you never know, although germany really isn't all that far from technology viewpoint.

The basic assumption of your post is wrong as the country that is most endangered by China is Russia.


It's my opinion that they would go against USA together with EU, they can kill eachother later. None of these two countries would support USA, so that leaves them on EU side. Starting their own war would be silly since russia can still nuke china to high heavens, since China has only like 20-30 long range missiles, and under 1000 nuclear warheads in total.

BTW thanks for the book suggestion Anthirs.
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23248
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 12:58    Post subject: Re: War: EU vs. USA
BearishSun wrote:
BTW thanks for the book suggestion Anthirs.


Np, Larry Bond was btw involved in Tom Clancy's Red Storm. Be sure to check L.Bonds Red Phoenix too - its about the korea war restarting (not that it ever ended).


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 13:17    Post subject:
No one wins, everyone loses, because it would lead to nuclear warfare.


I also think fisk should be unbanned.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 13:18    Post subject:
dominae wrote:
No one wins, everyone loses, because it would lead to nuclear warfare.

Nuclear Holocaust. Wink


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 13:19    Post subject:
That's the big surprise Smile


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 13:49    Post subject:
Nuclear warfare doesn't mean holocaust. They may have a limited exchange and stop.


Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 13:51    Post subject:
I just want to see some zombies Sad


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 14:04    Post subject:
Well, holocaust doesn't mean they will whipe out everything either. If you have a nuclear war at this point in history there will be a holocaust.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
KnightRider2006
Banned



Posts: 742
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 14:05    Post subject:
Jenni wrote:
Nuclear warfare doesn't mean holocaust. They may have a limited exchange and stop.


OMG you do believe the military party line. Laughing
Back to top
Klinge




Posts: 367

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 14:38    Post subject:
If a war would break out it would be the last one for a long time... In war there are no winners, never forget that.

The Problem is if one of the countries should get cornered they would use anything to their disposal and yes it won't matter to them if it's ABC weapons as long as it helps. If a large scale war would break out there wouldn't be much of humanity left over. Of course at least 60% of the survivors would hate the people from other countries because of what they "did" to them. Oh and btw. I think Germany would be one of the last countries to attack another, I think they have learned their lessons...


Back to top
compubrain3000




Posts: 4094
Location: Egypt
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 14:52    Post subject:
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 14:57    Post subject:
KnightRider2006 wrote:


OMG you do believe the military party line. Laughing


Party line, what party line. Theres no way anyone can know what will happen in a nuclear war, just like a conventional war. So how can the "military party" (what ever the hell that is) have a line on it.


Back to top
KnightRider2006
Banned



Posts: 742
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 15:05    Post subject:
The military part line has always been that owning as many nuclear weapons as the West has does not mean total nuclear holocaust.

A limited nuclear exchange with another super power is a total myth.

The military can justify ANYTHING (as long as they get to kill people and own a lot of cool weapons they are happy).
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 15:36    Post subject:
Freakness wrote:
There wont be war US vs EU, because they are far too simmilar. There could be a war if EU would be overfloved by muslims in 100 years, but that war would be lost for EU, because those countries would be poor coz of muslim mentality.


Laughing Because all the muslims are poor right? Give me a break.

Anyway back on topic:

If the EU get Russia on their side we should have a pretty clear winner Razz as it is now the US might win a potential war situation.


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
swingman




Posts: 3602

PostPosted: Tue, 9th Jan 2007 16:01    Post subject:
Apart from technology, one of the most important factors that determine who wins a war is the will/ability to sustain losses. America has shown repeatedly its resolve to send thousands of soldiers into the face of certain death to achieve questionable victories. Although in the last few decades they have become a little more conservative in terms of acceptable casualty figures they still have a stronger stomach when it comes to seeing body-bags.

Europe on the other hand (post World War II that is) seems to have lost its military will when comes to committing troops even to peace-keeping missions. I just don't see the europeans so willingly give up their wine, cheese and bratwurst Razz and face the horrors of war. And I'm not just talking military deaths. It's the civillian casualties which break the back of a nation in an all-out war. Russia is the only country which has shown the stoicism to face an enemy, suffer huge losses and throw everything in the fight to defend the country. But again that was the last Great War and in this scenario I don't think they will be so keen to choose ANY side. They would much prefer to sit on the sidelines and let the 'filthy capitalists' destroy each other.Very Happy

And most importantly, the US is ONE nation and that is not a weakness. They may have their internal divisions but in the face of a common enemy they form a united fist. Whereas the EU is a bunch of bureacrats with fancy jobs in Brussels and the whole Union part of the EU hasn't really filtered down to the common man. At the first sign of trouble the EU will tear itself to pieces from within.
Back to top
Page 1 of 6 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group