CryEngine 2 licensed to develop a MMVW(Virtual World)
Page 1 of 1
Vodka-Redbull




Posts: 5134
Location: The Evil Empire
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 13:48    Post subject: CryEngine 2 licensed to develop a MMVW(Virtual World)
SAN FRANCISCO – March 7, 2007

– Avatar Reality, Inc., a new development entity
dedicated to the advancement of online community building, today announced that they
will become the first company to license Crytek’s new game middleware,
CryENGINE™2, for use in creating their recently announced massively multiplayer
virtual world (MMVW). Set in Terraformed Mars, Avatar Reality’s MMVW will allow
players to live their fantasy lives by creating personalized characters, or avatars, in a
beautiful environment.

About Avatar Reality, Inc.

Founded in December of 2006, Avatar Reality, Inc. is developing a new massively
multiplayer virtual world (MMVW) featuring stunning graphics, realistic characters and
endless social bonding opportunities. The Honolulu-based company consists of multiple
well-known and award-winning game developers including Henk Rogers, founder of Blue
Planet Software, Blue Lava Wireless and The Tetris Company and Kazuyuki Hashimoto,
former vice president of technology at Electronic Arts (EA) and chief technical officer of
Square USA. Prominent members of Avatar Reality’s advisory board also include:
Minoru Arakawa, former president of Nintendo America and Alexey Pajitnov, creator of Tetris.

http://www.avatar-reality.com/
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 14:21    Post subject:
what exactly is a MMVW?

Glad to see the engine is goin public. Hopefully it'll get passed around like the source engine.


Back to top
Stormwolf




Posts: 23243
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 14:27    Post subject: Re: CryEngine 2 licensed to develop a MMVW(Virtual World)
Vodka-Redbull wrote:
SAN FRANCISCO – March 7, 2007

– Avatar Reality, Inc., a new development entity
dedicated to the advancement of online community building, today announced that they
will become the first company to license Crytek’s new game middleware,
CryENGINE™2, for use in creating their recently announced massively multiplayer
virtual world (MMVW).
Set in Terraformed Mars, Avatar Reality’s MMVW will allow
players to live their fantasy lives by creating personalized characters, or avatars, in a
beautiful environment.

About Avatar Reality, Inc.

Founded in December of 2006, Avatar Reality, Inc. is developing a new massively
multiplayer virtual world (MMVW) featuring stunning graphics, realistic characters and
endless social bonding opportunities. The Honolulu-based company consists of multiple
well-known and award-winning game developers including Henk Rogers, founder of Blue
Planet Software, Blue Lava Wireless and The Tetris Company and Kazuyuki Hashimoto,
former vice president of technology at Electronic Arts (EA) and chief technical officer of
Square USA. Prominent members of Avatar Reality’s advisory board also include:
Minoru Arakawa, former president of Nintendo America and Alexey Pajitnov, creator of Tetris.

http://www.avatar-reality.com/


Razz
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 14:30    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
what exactly is a MMVW?

Glad to see the engine is goin public. Hopefully it'll get passed around like the source engine.
Cry engine 1 was only used on Far Cry? Would be nice to see CE2 on new games.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 14:52    Post subject:
deelix wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
what exactly is a MMVW?

Glad to see the engine is goin public. Hopefully it'll get passed around like the source engine.
Cry engine 1 was only used on Far Cry? Would be nice to see CE2 on new games.


ya that's what I meant. I'm sure people didn't want to buy into the engine as Crytek was new back then. Now that they have the respect of alot of the gaming community I'm sure dev's who want an engine will know to get CE2...hopefully. I have my fingers crossed they do as good with it as they did with CE1, ran great on even slow systems.


Back to top
Mumblingidiot




Posts: 203

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 16:33    Post subject:
Another Second life..

Second life with pretty pretty graphics thou. The furry sex and other freaky perversions will look almost real. Can't wait!

People don't have anything better to do? Like, real life?
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 19:58    Post subject:
Mumblingidiot wrote:
Another Second life..

Second life with pretty pretty graphics thou. The furry sex and other freaky perversions will look almost real. Can't wait!

People don't have anything better to do? Like, real life?


It's probably to escape from reality and do things you normally can't in real life? Just as in other games you play, no consequences in real- life from fucking around in a game...
Back to top
liansk




Posts: 1460

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 20:01    Post subject:
its just a reagular mmo they added the "virtual life" bit to atract attention.


Back to top
KeyserSoeze




Posts: 800

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 21:23    Post subject:
Eh come back when some one have intvented that virtual reality thing they have in star trek, that might be worth wasting time on Cool
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 21:24    Post subject:
It's like sims online only w/ better tit graphics Very Happy


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 21:35    Post subject:
Perverts! I tell mommy now!
Back to top
TiHKAL




Posts: 2350
Location: The Pub
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 21:57    Post subject:
KeyserSoeze wrote:
Eh come back when some one have intvented that virtual reality thing they have in star trek, that might be worth wasting time on Cool


Holodeck FTW!!!


PC: i7-4790k @ 4.4, 32GB @ 2400, Nvidia 1080TI FE, 2 TB Crucial MX500 SSD
Nintendo Switch SX OS Pro / PS4 Pro 5.05 Hen/Mira / PS3 Modded / Wii Modded / 360 Pre-Wave4 mod
Back to top
KeyserSoeze




Posts: 800

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 22:40    Post subject:
yez ^^
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Mar 2007 23:05    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
ya that's what I meant. I'm sure people didn't want to buy into the engine as Crytek was new back then. Now that they have the respect of alot of the gaming community I'm sure dev's who want an engine will know to get CE2

It is because Cryengine/2 is not a middleware solution. Wink


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 00:37    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:

It is because Cryengine/2 is not a middleware solution. Wink


Im not an expert on this, but isn't cryengine 2 as a solution comparable to source or unreal 3 engine? They're not middleware afaik and sell pretty well.
Nevertheless I do hope crytek gets to sell many licences. certainly would lighten up competition on the market, UE3 is just too dominant, every 2nd fps gonna use it just like UE2...
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 09:53    Post subject:
No, it ain't. Cryengine is on the line with Doom3engine and Source, as much as they want to claim shit, they are not middleware solutions. They were made with one specific game in mind, and only that. But yes, it so happens that non-middleware solution engines get licensed now and then (Doom3engine for Q4, Prey and ETQW, Cryengine2 for this shit, etc) - but it is very far away from the scale that middleware engines sell on, like the Unreal-Engines.

I have no problem whatsoever that almost all of the gaming world has licensed UE3, I think it's a brilliant move - and it doesn't mean that games will look the same, on the contrary.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
poullou




Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 11:09    Post subject:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38102
This may help this discussion Smile


Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 19:01    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
No, it ain't. Cryengine is on the line with Doom3engine and Source, as much as they want to claim shit, they are not middleware solutions. They were made with one specific game in mind, and only that. But yes, it so happens that non-middleware solution engines get licensed now and then (Doom3engine for Q4, Prey and ETQW, Cryengine2 for this shit, etc) - but it is very far away from the scale that middleware engines sell on, like the Unreal-Engines.

I have no problem whatsoever that almost all of the gaming world has licensed UE3, I think it's a brilliant move - and it doesn't mean that games will look the same, on the contrary.


Your arguments make sense but you claim cryengine 2 was made only with 1 game in mind, which I don't tihnk is quite true. Maybe true for CE1, but CE2 was afaik especially developed to be sold to other teams. I remember them claiming in interviews that they wanted to establish cryengine 2 as a new competitor to game engines like unreal 3. The fact that crytek is now making extreme promotion for cryengine 2, they even opened a new developing studio just for working on cryengine2 based developing products (the engine is also being promoted for architectural modelling etc). They have a team working on PS3 versions of CE2 developing kits. Crysis is only going to come out on PC, they said that multiple times. EA has announced to use cryengine 2 for other EA games as well. Speaks a lot for them aiming CE2 as a middleware solution Smile
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 19:06    Post subject:
1) EA isnt going to be able to shit with that engine just as they can't with any engine.

2) In one of their interviews they said they planned on brining crysis to PS3 as well. Did they change that?


Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 9th Mar 2007 21:31    Post subject:
saddamhussein wrote:
Your arguments make sense but you claim cryengine 2 was made only with 1 game in mind, which I don't tihnk is quite true.

Hmm, maybe I should have rephrased myself; in-house/in-company.

Quote:
EA has announced to use cryengine 2 for other EA games as well

Not to be blunt, but where? Just because they bought up Crytek, doesn't mean they automatically own all the rights to Cryengine2. Wink


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Sat, 10th Mar 2007 11:43    Post subject:
Quote:

Not to be blunt, but where? Just because they bought up Crytek, doesn't mean they automatically own all the rights to Cryengine2.


http://www.mediafeet.com/2007/03/03/crysis-goes-in-house-at-eala/
Smile


Quote:
2) In one of their interviews they said they planned on brining crysis to PS3 as well. Did they change that?


They never said it would come out on PS3. The stated it multiple times, in fact they denied it from the very beginning saying crysis was exclusively just for PC. It's going to be handled like in Far Cry i guess, theres going to be spinoffs of crysis for the consoles. But crysis itself is PC exclusive.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sat, 10th Mar 2007 12:48    Post subject:
Shit man, I must have amnesia. I posted that myself in the C&C topic. Laughing

But I must agree with SpykeZ here, I am very sceptical about what EA can do with the engine.
SpykeZ wrote:
1) EA isnt going to be able to shit with that engine just as they can't with any engine.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
saddamhussein




Posts: 691
Location: not where I'm supposed to be
PostPosted: Sat, 10th Mar 2007 13:41    Post subject:
Well, they can give the engine to a good dev studio, theres no reason why they shouldn't be able to handle that engine Confused Of course EA sucks as a publisher, but that doesn't mean they got no good developing studios. If that cc renegade 2 thing is true I'm positive that a good studio will get the job...
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sat, 10th Mar 2007 17:14    Post subject:
saddamhussein wrote:
Well, they can give the engine to a good dev studio, theres no reason why they shouldn't be able to handle that engine Confused Of course EA sucks as a publisher, but that doesn't mean they got no good developing studios. If that cc renegade 2 thing is true I'm positive that a good studio will get the job...


im not trying to be the asshole of the thread but EA lucked out on C&C 3. I'd like to know the last decent game EA put out before cnc that doesn't include the BF series which was a 50/50 success rate. Fact is they suck on FPS more than anything. So im not entirely sure why anyone would hope Renegade 2 comes out with EA on it. It was successful the first time cause...thats right...EA wasn't as piece of shit as they are now. They got the funds to do great things, just not the devotion and brains to complete the task. This is all entirely my opinion so of course feel free to disagree. I do however give EA mad props on C&C3, I didn't think they had it in them to do it.


Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group