Gamers Bill Of Rights Decreed
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
NuclearShadow
Banned



Posts: 1948

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:08    Post subject: Gamers Bill Of Rights Decreed
Quote:
Galactic Civilizations creator and Impulse digital distributor Stardock unveiled a pc-centric "Gamers' Bill of Rights".

"It's a series of guidelines we're trying to introduce in an effort to get our industry to be a little more standardized in how we deal with our games", Stardock's Brad Wardell explained.

Stardock is a new studio that co-developed Sins Of A Solar Empire and is currently partnering with Gas Powered Games on the upcoming Demigod.

The Gamers' Bill of Rights reads as follows:

1) Gamers shall have the right to return games that don’t work with their computers for a full refund.
2) Gamers shall have the right to demand that games be released in a finished state.
3) Gamers shall have the right to expect meaningful updates after a game’s release.
4) Gamers shall have the right to demand that download managers and updaters not force themselves to run or be forced to load in order to play a game.
5) Gamers shall have the right to expect that the minimum requirements for a game will mean that the game will play adequately on that computer.
6) Gamers shall have the right to expect that games won’t install hidden drivers or other potentially harmful software without their consent.
7) Gamers shall have the right to re-download the latest versions of the games they own at any time.
Cool Gamers shall have the right to not be treated as potential criminals by developers or publishers.
9) Gamers shall have the right to demand that a single-player game not force them to be connected to the Internet every time they wish to play.
10) Gamers shall have the right that games which are installed to the hard drive shall not require a CD/DVD to remain in the drive to play.

Wardell is working on setting up an ESRB-type agency that would certify games adherence to the Gamers' Bill of Rights and he hopes that gamers won't buy games that doesn't carry the Gamers' Bill of Rights logo. The agency will be independent and won't be controlled by Stardock.

http://www.megagames.com/news/html/pc/thegamersbillofrightsdecreed.shtml

Now if only gamers would stand up and force developers to obey these rights.
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10797
Location: UK
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:13    Post subject:
oh yes. i like that idea


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
Back to top
MannyK




Posts: 1405
Location: Brazil
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:17    Post subject:
too bad it's not going to happen Sad
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:25    Post subject:
guess #4 is about crap STeam and GameTap , and #9 also about those two plus those games that use the TAGES internet activation and Securom (even #6 talks about Securom it installs drivers with $ in front of them making them invisible)
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:27    Post subject:
Some of those are not realistic at all, and if passed piracy would massively increase, that's the last thing PC gaming needs. Number 2 and 3 almost contradict each other, how is it a right to expect updates to a bug free game? This only applies to MMORPG's in my opinion.

As a consumer the most powerful right you have is the use of discretion when it comes to spending your money. If you don't appreciate a product, don't buy it.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10797
Location: UK
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:42    Post subject:
@ AnimalMother

#2 just basically says games should not be rushed

how would piracy massively increase?


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:48    Post subject:
I think piracy would decrease rather than increase.
Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:49    Post subject:
"7) Gamers shall have the right to re-download the latest versions of the games they own at any time."

Good fuckin luck. The only company I can think of that does this is Blizzard, and they only started doing it 1 month ago.
Back to top
FireMaster




Posts: 13370
Location: I do not belong
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 02:52    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Some of those are not realistic at all, and if passed piracy would massively increase, that's the last thing PC gaming needs. Number 2 and 3 almost contradict each other, how is it a right to expect updates to a bug free game? This only applies to MMORPG's in my opinion.

As a consumer the most powerful right you have is the use of discretion when it comes to spending your money. If you don't appreciate a product, don't buy it.


you can't expect a perfect game but they're saying that atleast when you release a patch it should really fix the problem in the game and not just fix one and pop another etc...

but yeah these days 70% of games aren't completely finished when they're out

I think in all fairness we can say that if a person has played through a game and loved the experience he's gonna want more and he is gonna buy the game eventually when he can afford it to get more games like that ( the witcher *worships* )
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 03:24    Post subject:
i love stardock Very Happy
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 03:28    Post subject:
-=Cartoon=- wrote:
i love stardock Very Happy


yah, well then why don't you go marry it! I bet it's possible since you live in paradise! Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Sad Crying or Very sad Luckiest asshole alive!!


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 03:28    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
I think piracy would decrease rather than increase.


Yeah in an ideal world. But people are bastards and most would just take advantage of the increased ease of piracy.

Back when copy protection was in it's infancy, the proportional amount of piracy was absurd. This is of course taking account of the fact that back then point-to-point file sharing and limited popularity mean that a direct comparison of numbers is meaningless.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3341
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:10    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Some of those are not realistic at all, and if passed piracy would massively increase, that's the last thing PC gaming needs. Number 2 and 3 almost contradict each other, how is it a right to expect updates to a bug free game? This only applies to MMORPG's in my opinion.

As a consumer the most powerful right you have is the use of discretion when it comes to spending your money. If you don't appreciate a product, don't buy it.


Im with ya, some of the suggestions are down right stupid, like we would be a kinda of race, the gamer race. And have the "right" to get a the game in a"finished state" , are you kidding me. Why not put in a demand there you want the right to sun just because you travel to a sunny country.

And #10, what kinda world do you live in, we would be back to "Don't copy that floppy".

How would #1 work, would I like come to you're house to see that it is not working, and just hope you just didn't install the game and went back to the store.

"meaningful updates" whats that? Maybe Horse armor was not the best thing in the world but those that like it, do you want to take it away from them.

#4 Steam? The reason they do this is because it's best for the costumer, before steam a update for CS got out but everyone was not knowing about it and this crated frustration. What steam dose is helping ppl keep up to date with minimal effort.

#5 there is to much to take in account here to make this work, software you have installed may slow you're computer down. OR there might be something wrong with you're hardware. OR a driver issue.

#6 "without their consent" Think it is stated in the EULA, and with securom there is a big box of text first time you start the game that u need secrum installed to play the game and you have to agree for it to install.

#7 So you wanna force every game developer to sett up server so you can download you're game at any time?

#8 Why do I have to be scanned at the air port, what did I do wrong?

#9 Steama gain? you can run it in off line mode.

It may look beautifully in theory but in real life it's down right retarded.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:20    Post subject:
Why is it stupid to want a fucking finished game? Are you actually defending devs who release bugridden crapfests?
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:21    Post subject:
I agree with Karmeck. I think that this all sounds really rosy on paper, but for the majority of the industry, these suggestions simply wouldn't work out very well. It does seem to work alright for Stardock, and that's great, more power to 'em, but it's silly for anyone to think that these rules would work for every single developer/publisher.

Naish wrote:
Good fuckin luck. The only company I can think of that does this is Blizzard, and they only started doing it 1 month ago.

Uh, what about Steam?


Correcting people since 2007 even if they're not wrong.
Back to top
Xenthalon




Posts: 1722
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:26    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Number 2 and 3 almost contradict each other, how is it a right to expect updates to a bug free game? This only applies to MMORPG's in my opinion.


2 probably means the game should be playable, small balancing fixes are always very possible. Take for instance Gothic 3, you couldn't even get to all the endings in the unpatched game because of too many bugs, #2 tries to prevent such things from happening, while #3 ensures bugfixes if there are any found.
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3341
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:30    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
Why is it stupid to want a fucking finished game? Are you actually defending devs who release bugridden crapfests?


It's a relative so you cant demand it as a fact. You cant demand that a game is bug free. It just don't work in the real world. And to be honest I rater see a game come out buggy then not coming out at all.
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:30    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
Why is it stupid to want a fucking finished game?

Well, the question here is what exactly does "finished" mean?
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:31    Post subject:
Cedge wrote:
djaoni wrote:
Why is it stupid to want a fucking finished game?

Well, the question here is what exactly does "finished" mean?


Not an unoptimized PS2 port with 600 bugs?

And what's this talk about the real world, do you think Stardock releases games in their own fantasy world or something?
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3341
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:39    Post subject:
That is of cause what every one wants. But that is not how the world works.

"And what's this talk about the real world"

This would work in a fantasy world were every one bought their games, but in this the "real" world that is not how things work.


Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:50    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
Not an unoptimized PS2 port with 600 bugs?

That statement only applies to PS2 ports, which, in case you weren't aware, the vast majority of PC games are not.
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:51    Post subject:
lol at "#4 Steam? The reason they do this is because it's best for the costumer" YEAH RIGHT it doesn't even have costumer support
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:51    Post subject:
But the thing is you can pirate like every game right now, I just don't see what changes.

And what is it that wouldn't "work in the real world"? That devs play the game before releasing?
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 17:56    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
That devs play the game before releasing?

Or commitment to support the game post-release.
Back to top
javlar




Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 18:44    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
"7) Gamers shall have the right to re-download the latest versions of the games they own at any time."

Good fuckin luck. The only company I can think of that does this is Blizzard, and they only started doing it 1 month ago.


Mythic started doing that in 2004... Blizzard was never first with anything, just learn that and don't post until then Razz



Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10797
Location: UK
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 20:20    Post subject:
Quote:
1) Gamers shall have the right to return games that don’t work with their computers for a full refund.
2) Gamers shall have the right to demand that games be released in a finished state.
3) Gamers shall have the right to expect meaningful updates after a game’s release.
4) Gamers shall have the right to demand that download managers and updaters not force themselves to run or be forced to load in order to play a game.
5) Gamers shall have the right to expect that the minimum requirements for a game will mean that the game will play adequately on that computer.
6) Gamers shall have the right to expect that games won’t install hidden drivers or other potentially harmful software without their consent.
7) Gamers shall have the right to re-download the latest versions of the games they own at any time.
Cool Gamers shall have the right to not be treated as potential criminals by developers or publishers.
9) Gamers shall have the right to demand that a single-player game not force them to be connected to the Internet every time they wish to play.
10) Gamers shall have the right that games which are installed to the hard drive shall not require a CD/DVD to remain in the drive to play.


for the ppl with no imagination Rolling Eyes heres what these things could mean.

1) game is activated online and to return u must use a revoke tool
2) as i said before this could just mean its not rushed
3) as it says
4) not too sure what this means..?
5) no bullshit with the requirements
6) big clear signs if a game is to install any 'hidden' software
7) if u buy a game online, u can download it as many times as u want, when u want.
Cool not going to try and think of a scenario this would apply to but im sure if u give it some thought u can.
9) u do not need to be connected to the net to play a single player game
10) why do we still need the disk on the drive? mass effect doesnt

this took me five minutes to think of. stop being so bias


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 20:45    Post subject:
Except in your interpretation #1 and #9 potentially contradict themselves. Biased idealists are almost useless.


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10797
Location: UK
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 21:02    Post subject:
AnimalMother wrote:
Except in your interpretation #1 and #9 potentially contradict themselves. Biased idealists are almost useless.


yeah maybe they do contradict but im sure the original 1 - 10 are not finalised and there would be changes and certain games that are exempt.

i think the way that its headed would be a good idea tho.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 21:21    Post subject:
Newty182 wrote:
yeah maybe they do contradict but im sure the original 1 - 10 are not finalised and there would be changes and certain games that are exempt.

Exempt from what? The fantasy wishlist that a single small publisher wishes the rest of the industry would follow?

It doesn't really matter, dude, since it's not like these are universal rules the entire industry has agreed to or anything.
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3341
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Sep 2008 21:28    Post subject:
Reading from the link in the first post they want it like a brand that a game can earn. Like a "Editors choice".


Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group