Page 1 of 3 |
morxxx
Posts: 264
Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 20:53 Post subject: Quake 4 - u will get horney ? |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vurt
Posts: 13549
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 20:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well I guess it cant be any worse than doom3 (which sucked ass).
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:00 Post subject: |
|
 |
Doom isn't bad - Doom 3 is crap though.
Im a cockfag
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:06 Post subject: |
|
 |
wtf do you need to play this ? AMD ATHLON 2000000GHZ with 20GB of DDR ram ? and about 100gb free space ? not to mention ATI Radeon X900000000000000000000000000000000.
Windows XP SP2
Asus A7N8X Deluxe 2.0
Athlon XP2500 @ 2.4GHz (overclocked)
1GB Corsair XMS DDR400 (overclocked)
Radeon 9700 Pro (overclocked)
2x60GB Maxtor 7200/8MB
TDK CD/RW 52x32x52
TDK DVD Burner 8X/8X
10MBit Cable
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
I thought there was a preview in PCGamer as well... Is this true and if it is where can I find scans of it?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morxxx
Posts: 264
Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
i only found them until now ..
bi0 ?!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:11 Post subject: |
|
 |
same dark indoor environments like doom3...same graphics...except robots instead of monsters? Looks like shit to me.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
SkylineGTR wrote: | wtf do you need to play this ? AMD ATHLON 2000000GHZ with 20GB of DDR ram ? and about 100gb free space ? not to mention ATI Radeon X900000000000000000000000000000000. |
Dude, did u need that to run Doom 3?
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
Actually no, I was just fuckin around, but the way Doom 3 played, this game I doubt will be any better, I did get decent 60's fps and all in Doom 3, but its nothing to be excited over.
Windows XP SP2
Asus A7N8X Deluxe 2.0
Athlon XP2500 @ 2.4GHz (overclocked)
1GB Corsair XMS DDR400 (overclocked)
Radeon 9700 Pro (overclocked)
2x60GB Maxtor 7200/8MB
TDK CD/RW 52x32x52
TDK DVD Burner 8X/8X
10MBit Cable
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
default wrote: | same dark indoor environments like doom3...same graphics...except robots instead of monsters? Looks like shit to me. |
If you look at the last scan, you'll see a fairly large outdoor area.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter
Posts: 7449
Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|MaguS|
Posts: 319
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
Looks like a mod for Doom 3..
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyprien
Posts: 115
Location: In The Eye Of The World.
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 21:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
I didnt like the way the weapons looked.. =/
defiantly not the art versions...
There's nothing to winning, really. That is, if you happen to be blessed with a keen eye, an agile mind, and no scruples whatsoever.
- Alfred Hitchcock
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 22:00 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yea i agree with skyline for once, raven is taking the easy way out and just takign doom3 and changing the story. Plus some people with good systems came to a crawl in doom 3, now your gonna take large outdoor enviorments and add like 4x more craetures on screen? Sure..... nothing to look at here, keep moving.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 22:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
|MaguS| wrote: | Looks like a mod for Doom 3.. |
I was thinking exactly the same, since doom3 sucked ass i am not expecting anything from quake4. Looks like the same crap, dark corridors over and over again with even more crappy level design, the only thing missing is this annoying flashlight. That would be fun if you have to switch between weapons and flashlight during deathmatch, lol
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 22:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
looks to much like doom3 indeed
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 22:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
bleh looks just like doom 3. its just gonna be doom 3 + different models + different story. I hate the dark shadowy look on those games. Makes it hard as fuck to enjoy em always squinting at the monitor. yea yea turn up the brightness. but then the game looks like shit. Sorry but these days these kind of sci fi run and gun shooters just arent good anymore. Realistic combat simulation is where i think the best games in the FPS genre are at. Brothers in arms, MOH:PA etc etc these games are entertaining cinematic. Creeping down dark fucking corridors killing the same 2 models that charge at you for 10 + hours = 2 hours of fun 8+ hours of thinking ok something cool is bound to happen soon.
Maybe HL2 will inject something good into the sci fi FPS genre. And HALO 2 may turn out to be kickass on PC. But as for quake for, an old game on am unimpresive engine..(ooh the shadows...oooh the textures fuck that i want an engine that lets me be interactive, that imerses me in the world...afterall that's the whole point to playing a game, to be immersed in it)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 23:01 Post subject: |
|
 |
dvsone wrote: | i want an engine that lets me be interactive, that imerses me in the world...afterall that's the whole point to playing a game, to be immersed in it) |
how do you know that q4 wont let you be interactive?
just because its the d3 engine it doesnt have to be exactly like d3.
i can bet a million bucks (well not really 1million but you get the point) that the doom3 engine is way more than what we have seen in doom3.
if developers want interaction, then they will for sure be able to make that with the engine, without a doubt.
obviously id didnt go for that in doom3 for some reasons (they problary just wanted a plain and simple non stop action game), but im sure the engine can do that if the devs want it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 23:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
heretic looks like doom1 a bit. Hexen too, But look where raven took them! I liked heretic even more than the original doom 1 and 2 it was so damn good. I would not judge this game too quickly. 2 cents dropped off! Peace,
fear the led zeppelin that was!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheDamned
Posts: 508
Location: Montréal,QC, Canada
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 23:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
I hope its not like doom 3 ... crap.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 23:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
pallebrun wrote: |
obviously id didnt go for that in doom3 for some reasons (they problary just wanted a plain and simple non stop action game), but im sure the engine can do that if the devs want it. |
Not so sure about that. They didn't develop the engine just for d3 but to sell the engine to other developers (i am sure id makes more money out of licensing the engine than selling d3 in the long run).
So d3 is a marketing tool for their new engine, and i am sure they will try to show off the engine as good as possible and implement all features like interactivity with the environment.
Keep in mind that d3 officials said in interviews before the release that it will be THE most interactive game ever, wich we all know by now is a lie and nothing more than marketing gossip. I think the engine still has to prove that advanced interactivity is possible with it, and who knows how much work other developers have to put in the engine to achive interactivity.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 13th Sep 2004 23:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
pallebrun wrote: | dvsone wrote: | i want an engine that lets me be interactive, that imerses me in the world...afterall that's the whole point to playing a game, to be immersed in it) |
how do you know that q4 wont let you be interactive?
just because its the d3 engine it doesnt have to be exactly like d3.
i can bet a million bucks (well not really 1million but you get the point) that the doom3 engine is way more than what we have seen in doom3.
if developers want interaction, then they will for sure be able to make that with the engine, without a doubt.
obviously id didnt go for that in doom3 for some reasons (they problary just wanted a plain and simple non stop action game), but im sure the engine can do that if the devs want it. |
i'm not saying it wont be, but i'll bet its run and gun ad nauseum
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Embiz0n
Posts: 36
Location: Your mom`s panties
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 14th Sep 2004 00:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well, I couldnt resist ........................ CRAPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Windows XP SP2
Asus A7N8X Deluxe 2.0
Athlon XP2500 @ 2.4GHz (overclocked)
1GB Corsair XMS DDR400 (overclocked)
Radeon 9700 Pro (overclocked)
2x60GB Maxtor 7200/8MB
TDK CD/RW 52x32x52
TDK DVD Burner 8X/8X
10MBit Cable
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 14th Sep 2004 01:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
Quake 4 = doom 3 with a texture pack?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 14th Sep 2004 01:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
Raven really lost the plot with Elite Force 2, and this looks to cap it's arse, in the 'Oh Christ another game that looks just like Doom 3' stakes.
Seems a bit lazy.
Also what is Qauke as a concept, apart from being a death match multiplayer game. At least Unreal and Tournament contrive some sort of consistant world and style.
Don't really get what's going on with it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 14th Sep 2004 01:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
the first quake was nice, as i seem to remmember. too much weed over the years i guess.
anyhow, it all went downhill from there. i really hated quake2 and 3.
i just hope it wont be doom3 mod or someshit. all game dark and shit, boring gameplay with repetitive EVERY SINGLE THING.....
good day. i think.
the guy Yo'momma "act" like she don't know.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 3 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |