| Page 1 of 4 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:17 Post subject: IDSotware new shitty engine announced [pics inside] |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:24 Post subject: |
|
|
 Looks very shitty... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Woot more plastic looking crap
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm more interested in performance these days.
Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Uhhh, I wouldn't really call it "shit." Looks pretty good to me.
Or, are you just one of those people who sucks CryEngine's dick and instantly thinks that all other engines are shit?
Correcting people since 2007 even if they're not wrong.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 22:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| Cedge wrote: | | Or, are you just one of those people who sucks CryEngine's dick and instantly thinks that all other engines are shit? |
Yes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Teramos
Posts: 336
Location: Outer Limits
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:09 Post subject: |
|
|
i cant believe that you judge the engine on some blurry screens... looks like youre a really addicted fanboy to crysis. i can only say that carmack knows how to make a good shooter.. btw the engine looks quit nice, whats your problem?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:11 Post subject: |
|
|
farcry was a very boring game, just looked nice. i fear the same for crysis
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | Glottis wrote: | | Woot more plastic looking crap |
 Spoiler: | |
|
lulz
blurry screenies or not, it looks just like doom3, well, actually more like quake4, coz d3 was all black. plastic looking characters is just a no no!
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Teramos wrote: | | i cant believe that you judge the engine on some blurry screens... looks like youre a really addicted fanboy to crysis. i can only say that carmack knows how to make a good shooter.. btw the engine looks quit nice, whats your problem? |
Carmack doesnt make shooters, he just codes the engine and tools and leaves the art side and game itself to artists. He doesnt even controls it. And IDSoftware's mentality got old, admit it. They are stuck in Quake 2 times.
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | farcry was a very boring game, just looked nice. i fear the same for crysis |
I would not say so. FC is not one of those boring games. Doom3 was. FC has lots of AI related surprises.
And Crysis game, I dont think it will be boring, because right now you can do more stuff in the game itself, there is more freedom and they actualy learned from their and others mistakes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:33 Post subject: |
|
|
From what I can see the environment looks good but the character model there is poor - doesn't sit well from what I can see in the shot. Obviously it's rare that static screenshots will do a game justice so we'll just have to wait it out until there is some high resolution screens and video capture.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23245
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | farcry was a very boring game, just looked nice. i fear the same for crysis |
I kind of enjoyed Farcry. Apart from the nice graphics I thought it had a nice feeling over it with entertaining places to fight at. The carrier part was nice but abit hard on the deck - but the rest was enjoyable. Only thing I think was abit boring was the ending..I had expected abit more from it.
Edit: oh, and as freakness said - it had some nice AI too.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:48 Post subject: |
|
|
My god you guys would argue black is white. Theres no getting away from it that engine looks amazing. Anyone that says it looks shit needs their head looked at.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| Jenni wrote: | | Anyone that says it looks shit needs their head looked at. |
did you forget you were in the nforce forums?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:50 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Ãœber-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks good if you ask me. I think maybe the engine is about the environment more than the models.
Also, if you read the fucking article instead of looking at pics.
""What we've got here is the entire world with unique textures, 20GB of textures covering this track. They can go in and look at the world and, say, change the color of the mountaintop, or carve their name into the rock. They can change as much as they want on surfaces with no impact on the game."
Last edited by Phluxed on Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 11th Jun 2007 23:57 Post subject: |
|
|
... and it probably looks 100x times better in motion with all the lighting etc.
"Only one country can destroy NATO in 40 minutes - it's Russia"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | ... and it probably looks 100x times better in motion with all the lighting etc. |
Yes, worth bearing that in mind. Take the following for example;
This image is pretty cool. Cinematic even. Imagine if they could make that a dynamic, bustling environment (it evokes a Star Wars pod racing environment to me). How cool would that be then? Static shots don't tell the whole story.
Still, ID make ugly character models. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kosmiq
Posts: 2304
Location: Somewhere
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:19 Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO most ID engines after the Q3 engine really look plastic, stiff and all wrong. I enjoy source more because it has more details in the world, look more realistic and I'm sure as hell will enjoy Crysis graphics...
Behold his GLORY! Bow for the technical master!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:25 Post subject: |
|
|
it looks good, but when it will be released, i think in 2009-2010 it will look like shit
CPU : Intel i7 6900K | GC : Inno3D GTX 1080 FE | RAM : 128 GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200 | Case : Cooler Master COSMOS II | Mobo : Asus X99-DELUXE II | Cooler : Corsair H115i | PSU : Corsair HX1000i | Optical Drive : Asus BW-16D1HT | System Drive : Samsung 950 PRO M.2 PCIe 512Gb | HDD's : 7x ~ 28 Tb | OS : Win 10 Pro x64 | Monitor : Dell U2713HM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:32 Post subject: |
|
|
20gb of textures, what hardware can handle that!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
is that an indian with a foam finger?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jun 2007 00:45 Post subject: |
|
|
$20 says, no matter all your whining, you're all still gonna play the goddamn game.
Not only that but it's like 5 goddamn _cam_ pics at a mac event demo!!! i mean wtf!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
