Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 5th Oct 2004 21:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
i don't think so. they stoped after MK4
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 5th Oct 2004 21:24 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weedo
Posts: 1506
Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue, 5th Oct 2004 22:06 Post subject: |
|
 |
There are some awesome fps on consoles. But no RTS or adventure games.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 6th Oct 2004 04:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
great fps's on consoles? halo, halo2 and that's it and both of them would be better on a pc. goldeneye was incredibly overrated.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
Posted: Wed, 6th Oct 2004 04:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
Goldeneye was a great game. Now Halo is an overrated game.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 6th Oct 2004 14:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
for sure man. goldeneye lives on, maybe not graphically but def. in multiplayer and storymode. halo was just good graphically the AI isnt as good as in goldeneye nor the story / scenarios.
Also command and conquer 1 on the PSX was pretty good for a console rts. i think its just the controller u use makes which a game better i.e RTS/RPG/FPS/3PS/adventure = keyboard racing games = steerin wheel flight games = joystick. beat em ups / sports games = controll pad. shooters i.e house of the dead/time crises = light gun
all in all a PC is the best platform because u can get all of the above for it   
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |