The future of PC gaming by Cevat Yerli
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Breezer_




Posts: 10763
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:27    Post subject: The future of PC gaming by Cevat Yerli
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:29    Post subject:
jesus christ im getting REALYL sick of these articles. Every 2 days someone releases an article about how PC gaming is going downhill, then someone like blizzard who's making millions off their MMO is saying PC gaming is where it's at, then crysis comes out and says pc sucks, then valve comes back and is all like w00tpc then some console fag site is all wtfpcbbq


Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:38    Post subject:
soon as i saw that crytek douches name, i knew it wasnt anything that needed to be read or considered or even fucking acknowledged..


Back to top
Divvy




Posts: 1445

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:40    Post subject:
Gabe's stool is more solid than these recurring presumptions.
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:43    Post subject:
Exactly, who gives a shit who they think.

State of PC games is same as a year ago, that was same as a year before that, which was same like year before that, and that goes on and on up to Nov 22, 2005, the day X360 was released.

I don't care about their business or how much money they make/lose. They will still pump out console ports after they are finished with milking console sales and their stupid DLC. With multi platform engines it's easy as ever to make cheap console port to make bit more cash off their games.


Last edited by tolanri on Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:45; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10763
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:43    Post subject:
Cevat the fucking console boy Yerli. Unbeliavable, i bet when Crysis 2 gets released, PC options are CONTROLLER/Keyboard-mouse. Graphics options Gamma/resolution + 30 fps lock.
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10763
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:45    Post subject:
Lets say like Blizzard, they made with some fucking "item" mount ingame for world of warcraft in their store, more than Crytek makes with their games Very Happy. Not really but almost.
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 02:50    Post subject:
Breezer_ wrote:
Lets say like Blizzard, they made with some fucking "item" mount ingame for world of warcraft in their store, more than Crytek makes with their games Very Happy. Not really but almost.


Which is unbelievable, hilarious and sad all at the same time. No matter how bad game is, a stupid virtual item should not make more money than a game lot of people worked hard (or not) on for several months/years.

On top of that it just show how it's easy to make quick cash with virtual items on facebuch or similar shit, which will be exploited by companies in near future.
Back to top
HunterHare




Posts: 742

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 03:16    Post subject:
so its like this,

"my game aint selling enough so PC gaming is dead"

alright


Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.8 // 4GB DDR3 // GTX 285
Back to top
tonizito




Posts: 51264
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 03:29    Post subject:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
RRX2




Posts: 276

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 03:30    Post subject:
More like this: "mimimi developers didn't want to license my engine, so PC Gaming is deaaaadd... mimimi"


DaggerXL: A The Elder Scrolls Chapter II: Daggerfall Engine Remake

http://daggerxl.wordpress.com
Back to top
tonizito




Posts: 51264
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 03:36    Post subject:
Cevat wrote:
mimimi developers didn't want to license my engine, so PC Gaming is deaaaadd... mimimi



Laughing


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
Theescapist




Posts: 4107
Location: Manchester U.K
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 04:23    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
jesus christ im getting REALYL sick of these articles. Every 2 days someone releases an article about how PC gaming is going downhill, then someone like blizzard who's making millions off their MMO is saying PC gaming is where it's at, then crysis comes out and says pc sucks, then valve comes back and is all like w00tpc then some console fag site is all wtfpcbbq


Got to agree here...


Ryzen 5 3600 cpu@3.60 Mhz.
hyper x 32 gb ddr 4 memory.
Msi Carbon gaming pro ac motherboard.
Evga 600 psu.
Msi Armour rx 8 gb 5700 Graphic card.
Ps4 Standard 500gb.
Lg 4k 42 inch tv.
Oculus Quest 2.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 04:45    Post subject:
tonizito wrote:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


Ya, he's proved himself just fine actually. Just about everything they put out when they were Irrational Games has been fucking GOLD.

System Shock 2, with assistance from Looking Glass.
Deep Cover, with assistance from Looking Glass (unreleased)
The Lost (cancelled after being co-developed with FXLabs Studios)
Freedom Force
Tribes: Vengeance
Freedom Force vs. the Third Reich
SWAT 4
SWAT 4: The Stetchkov Syndicate
BioShock (give or take some opinions, the story line and world were amazing, gameplay a bit meh)


Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 05:20    Post subject:
Breezer_ wrote:
Cevat the fucking console boy Yerli. Unbeliavable, i bet when Crysis 2 gets released, PC options are CONTROLLER/Keyboard-mouse. Graphics options Gamma/resolution + 30 fps lock.


And you'll be wrong.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 05:21    Post subject:
tolanri wrote:
State of PC games is same as a year ago, that was same as a year before that, which was same like year before that, and that goes on and on up to Nov 22, 2005, the day X360 was released.


This couldn't be further from the truth.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 06:03    Post subject:
tonizito wrote:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


Ok.

Warren Spector agrees with Yerli somewhat: http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/164608/warren-spectors-new-game-is-well-its-a-secret/

Quote:
[PC gaming] clearly it's in trouble. Well...maybe we need to be a little more nuanced than that -- I don't think the Blizzard guys are seeing any problems in the PC market! From the perspective of developers making single-player games, in whatever genre, the PC probably isn't the place anymore. Personally, I feel some regret because I have such a long history with the PC, and I love its open-endedness. In my heart, there's still a little PC in me.

But the reality is, games aren't just an art form, they're a business. If the consoles are where the audience is, then that's where you have to go. It's not good, it's not bad, it just...is.


Ken Levine's first 3 options for what PC gaming will be in the future do not include AAA/singleplayer games: http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64679

Quote:
What's the future of the PC? Social games? MMOs? Freemium?


Gabe Newell, this is only few days old, thinks Steam is great because of its social features that were added to TF2, that are like microtransactions: http://www.battlestrats.com/home/_/general-news/valve-first-user-created-content-store-is-a-success-r494

Quote:
"At a time when content creators are struggling with changing markets and evolving technologies, the Steam community is sending a clear message with these checks," said Gabe Newell, President of Valve. "Platforms that enable this kind of peer-to-peer exchange of virtual goods and services are going to be enthusiastically received. They create an inherently greater efficiency in connecting creators and consumers."


John Carmack, one month old interview, thinks that action games should target the consoles first: http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/8_questions_john_carmack

Quote:
We expect to be successful in the PC market, but the consoles are still the dominant targets for an action game.


John Romero was revealed few days ago that has returned to developing PC games, though this time he's developing Facebook games for a company that has a 150 million(!) userbase: http://www.bit-tech.net/news/gaming/2010/10/21/john-romero-working-on-facebook-game/1

Quote:
John Romero, the man who helped conceptualise and create Doom, Quake and Wolfenstein - not to mention Commander Keen and Dangerous Dave - is now apparently working on a new Facebook game.

While it's easy to snort dismissively at Romero's move to social games that nobody cares about, the numbers tell a different story - LOLapps boasts 150 million monthly active users across all its games. It's last major title, Critter Island, has attracted 1.2 million player in just a few months and, according to VentureBeat, is 'social gaming companies that no one has heard about'


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 06:16    Post subject:
Quote:
since consumers in the future won't be willing any longer to spend $50 or more for a AAA PC Game


stopped reading
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 09:49    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
tonizito wrote:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


Ya, he's proved himself just fine actually. Just about everything they put out when they were Irrational Games has been fucking GOLD.

System Shock 2, with assistance from Looking Glass.
Deep Cover, with assistance from Looking Glass (unreleased)
The Lost (cancelled after being co-developed with FXLabs Studios)
Freedom Force
Tribes: Vengeance
Freedom Force vs. the Third Reich
SWAT 4
SWAT 4: The Stetchkov Syndicate
BioShock (give or take some opinions, the story line and world were amazing, gameplay a bit meh)

Cevat [o rly?] Yerli has creates System Shock 2, Freedom Force, SWAT, BioShock? Confused
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 09:58    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
tonizito wrote:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


Ya, he's proved himself just fine actually. Just about everything they put out when they were Irrational Games has been fucking GOLD.

System Shock 2, with assistance from Looking Glass.
Deep Cover, with assistance from Looking Glass (unreleased)
The Lost (cancelled after being co-developed with FXLabs Studios)
Freedom Force
Tribes: Vengeance
Freedom Force vs. the Third Reich
SWAT 4
SWAT 4: The Stetchkov Syndicate
BioShock (give or take some opinions, the story line and world were amazing, gameplay a bit meh)

Cevat [o rly?] Yerli has creates System Shock 2, Freedom Force, SWAT, BioShock? Confused



durp read that wrong lol!


Back to top
tonizito




Posts: 51264
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 10:22    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
tonizito wrote:
I think it's interesting to hear Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Gabe Newell, John Carmack or even John Romero on their thoughts about the future of PC gaming, because they have more than proved themselves as PC developers.

This whinny fuck? Not so much.


Ok.

Warren Spector agrees with Yerli somewhat: http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/164608/warren-spectors-new-game-is-well-its-a-secret/

Quote:
[PC gaming] clearly it's in trouble. Well...maybe we need to be a little more nuanced than that -- I don't think the Blizzard guys are seeing any problems in the PC market! From the perspective of developers making single-player games, in whatever genre, the PC probably isn't the place anymore. Personally, I feel some regret because I have such a long history with the PC, and I love its open-endedness. In my heart, there's still a little PC in me.

But the reality is, games aren't just an art form, they're a business. If the consoles are where the audience is, then that's where you have to go. It's not good, it's not bad, it just...is.


Ken Levine's first 3 options for what PC gaming will be in the future do not include AAA/singleplayer games: http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64679

Quote:
What's the future of the PC? Social games? MMOs? Freemium?


Gabe Newell, this is only few days old, thinks Steam is great because of its social features that were added to TF2, that are like microtransactions: http://www.battlestrats.com/home/_/general-news/valve-first-user-created-content-store-is-a-success-r494

Quote:
"At a time when content creators are struggling with changing markets and evolving technologies, the Steam community is sending a clear message with these checks," said Gabe Newell, President of Valve. "Platforms that enable this kind of peer-to-peer exchange of virtual goods and services are going to be enthusiastically received. They create an inherently greater efficiency in connecting creators and consumers."


John Carmack, one month old interview, thinks that action games should target the consoles first: http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/8_questions_john_carmack

Quote:
We expect to be successful in the PC market, but the consoles are still the dominant targets for an action game.


John Romero was revealed few days ago that has returned to developing PC games, though this time he's developing Facebook games for a company that has a 150 million(!) userbase: http://www.bit-tech.net/news/gaming/2010/10/21/john-romero-working-on-facebook-game/1

Quote:
John Romero, the man who helped conceptualise and create Doom, Quake and Wolfenstein - not to mention Commander Keen and Dangerous Dave - is now apparently working on a new Facebook game.

While it's easy to snort dismissively at Romero's move to social games that nobody cares about, the numbers tell a different story - LOLapps boasts 150 million monthly active users across all its games. It's last major title, Critter Island, has attracted 1.2 million player in just a few months and, according to VentureBeat, is 'social gaming companies that no one has heard about'
NOOOOOOOOOOOO! Crying or Very sad
SpykeZ wrote:
durp read that wrong lol!
I blame tainted nuts. Check your nut source bro.


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 11:18    Post subject:
Sorry, my bad. I took SpykeZ' nuts, so he may be suffering from withdrawal Sad
Back to top
recapture




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 12:08    Post subject:
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9436
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 12:18    Post subject:
What to discuss here? The PC gaming is as it is because developers are not intrested in it anymore. It's easier for people to buy laptop for teh internetz/facebook and console to play games. PC as a computer in tower chassis is dying. Not to mention that it's less practical to connect it to the HD TV set Wink

Another thing is that most people are dumb as fuck. Playing a game on PC rig with mid range hardware in it bought in best buy can be frustrating. Low performence, setting shit up and ugly graphics in the end.
So the console with it's put and play solution is great for them. No more problems with diffrent configuration. No more frustration, now you can just sit your ass on the sofa and enjoy the game.

What I mean is that: standard PC's as we know it are dissapearing from the market being replaced by laptops. Parents are more willing to buy console for their children because it's cheaper option for longer period of time. They don't have to change the graphic card every year (of course right now is not so relevant as most games run great on older specs) and mess with drivers and ingame configuration.
This children's friends buy console, they want to play with them they should buy a console too, and so on.
More people will buy it, so in conclusion will buy more games for it.

The future of PC gaming will and is shfiting towards f2p mmo's with microtransactions and browser games.


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
Divvy




Posts: 1445

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 12:52    Post subject:
If you can enjoy the game with sub-HD resolutions and other technical shortcomings. I'm used to better things and it takes a lot of adjusting to switch over to the 360.

My 8yo niece won't touch the PS3 but is all over the PC whenever her parents allow. She tells me the games are too boring. I asked her why they're boring and she just said the typical 8yo "they just are", but I followed that up with "are they too simple, too repetitive?" and she goes "yeah". Her favorites on the PC are Sims 3, World of Warcraft and Minecraft. I'm somehow proud of her, LOL.

Obviously console games are selling more, but I'm far from ready to write eulogies for PC gaming.
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9436
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 13:15    Post subject:
90% of my friends bought xbox 360 and now it's their main gaming platform, 2 are playing WoW and only one is actually playing games on PC.
No to mention that most of those included in 90% are saying that console is uberplatform for playing games ("You should try playing FPS on console it's so much better than on PC" to quote one of them).

And when asked why they prefer playing on it the answer is: "When I return from work I just turn it on, sit comfortably on a couch and just play".
Back to top
recapture




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 13:30    Post subject:
Quote:

And when asked why they prefer playing on it the answer is: "When I return from work I just turn it on, sit comfortably on a couch and just play".


Laughing derpz
Back to top
bringiton




Posts: 3673

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 13:31    Post subject:
Actually I prefer playing on the PC, especially FPS.
But my PC is too old by now, most games don't run good anymore or at least look like crap. So I just get them for the 360, they might not look really great, but at least better on my PC. I just don't have the time anymore to upgrade my PC every year or so.
So yeah, basically I got lazy, but in the end all I want is to play some games after work, and that is easiest with consoles...


“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”
- Albert Camus
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14780

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 14:28    Post subject:
recapture wrote:
i think he's a jew.
Back to top
Dazz99




Posts: 7299

PostPosted: Fri, 29th Oct 2010 14:53    Post subject:
tolanri wrote:
Breezer_ wrote:
Lets say like Blizzard, they made with some fucking "item" mount ingame for world of warcraft in their store, more than Crytek makes with their games Very Happy. Not really but almost.


Which is unbelievable, hilarious and sad all at the same time. No matter how bad game is, a stupid virtual item should not make more money than a game lot of people worked hard (or not) on for several months/years.
spending several years on a game like crysis, putting in all that hard work and sweat only for it to turn out to be one of the most generic and bland shooters ever created.. i'd say they deserve the low sales

crytek suck balls, crysis is a terrible game (if you can even call it that, i'd call it a tech demo) and whilst i agree it's rather stupid for an ingame item to sell more than a game I must point out that WoW is played by over 12 million people and barely has any ingame items for sale hence why the first was so insanely popular

blizzard are known for quality, valve are also known for quality & both of them believe in pc gaming. both of them are also extremely successful at pulling in money also despite not branching out to consoles often, explain? no need it's pretty fucking obvious

leave the shitty toned down generic games for the consoles, keep the quality releases like starcraft on the PC


cockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcockcock
Back to top
Page 1 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group