What a BS excuse. (Reason for no The Force Unleashed on PC)
Page 1 of 5 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
AKofC




Posts: 4359

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 06:57    Post subject: What a BS excuse. (Reason for no The Force Unleashed on PC)
http://www.nzgamer.com/ps3/news/2563/exclusive-the-force-unleashed-information.html

Bullshit.

It's called scaling down and optimization. As a Jedi Knight and subsequently, Jedi Academy fan, this is just annoying.

This is only slightly less insulting than them porting the PS2 version.

Edit: http://kotaku.com/389776/force-unleashed-not-coming-to-pc-and-this-is-the-best-excuse-lucasarts-could-come-up-with

grinhurt @ 4000 dollar PC
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 07:37    Post subject:
well thats a new one... no pc version because the home pc's are inferior and so weak compared to the mighty consoles... right Very Happy

pc games have always had scalable options, with the ability to remove 'more intensive' features, and its never been an issue before. people either accept that their 10 year old pcs cant run the latest fancy shiny stuff, or they upgrade.


Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34545
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 07:57    Post subject:
Not to mention that "Force Unleashed" is coming out to DS/Wii platforms which are also quite weak compared to the PS3/X360
(They could always port those versions but that might cause a lot of problems similar to the Ironman PS2 port.)

It's easier with PS3 and X360 development though, porting it between both those consoles require some work but all console units are the same (Aside from HD space and other minor details.) whereas there's a ton of PC variations.

Still it wouldn't be that hard to port the X360 version to PC even though the requirements might be a bit higher for those wanting to play with details set to maximum and at a high resolution. (Which would affect sales which is probably a big reason for this together with a higher piracy number on PC, albeit console games are also heavily pirated but from what I know it's not anywhere near the same extent as PC piracy.)

EDIT: Still not all console titles are ported to PC, that's just how it works. Smile
(Would be nice to see more titles converted but quickly done ports aren't good either.)
Back to top
javlar




Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 08:21    Post subject:
While i feel bad about the console trend and that more and more of the traditional PC developers are taking the "easy" way out i dont really care any more. Console gaming is much more than it was ten years ago, the difference is so minimal compared to the PC so if they wanna stop making action and sportsgames for the PC you wont see me complaining, I prefer to play them on my console anyways.



Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
Back to top
vurt




Posts: 13468
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 08:24    Post subject:
They could've fixed this, eg. at the begining of the PC version the user selects 1-3 how powerful his PC is, 3=xbox360 or better machine, 2=PS2, 1 DS and they scale accordingly and gives each PC user a good experience just like on the different consoles. But i guess it'd be too much work.

Kind of glad i bought a xbox360, seems like its getting more and more common that games arent getting a PC release.. But i'll never pay for any of the games for the 360, it's not like i want to support this.
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 17923
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 10:42    Post subject:
Just tell them to fuck off then go buy the xbox360 and mod it, they really seem to enjoy sticking it up the ass of pc gamers lately but our day will come again some day, than they will be sorry, greedy motherfuckers.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 11:10    Post subject:
Whatever, I'll be warezing this on 360 to show them what I think on the subject.
Back to top
Xenthalon




Posts: 1722
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 11:23    Post subject:
Quote:
...in addition, Suey described the decision not to include sound in the game. "If we included sound, someone who didn't have a home theater would miss out on so many of the amazing elements," said Suey, " and if we toned it down, then someone who spent $10,000 isn't going to feel like he's getting something for value."

This reporter declined to mention that there are some people who are color blind while others have acute vision, for worry that the visuals were the next to go..


haha, that's a great comment from the second link.

Meh, I am going to pirate it for 360 then, wanted to buy it for PC because Jedi Academy was so awesome. But not this way Lucas Arts, not this way.
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 19:16    Post subject:
i dont want to belong to those console "people"...

i ll warez this game over 9000 times to make their pirating charts more interesting D:
maybe then those people will come back to the pc platform... or they stop making games altogether Razz


kogel mogel
Back to top
Naish




Posts: 797

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 19:20    Post subject:
From a business standpoint, they're being smart. So you can really just cry the fuck some more.

This platform is dead, and that's coming from a hardware enthusiast. Get a console and shut up.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 19:29    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
From a business standpoint, they're being smart. So you can really just cry the fuck some more.

This platform is dead, and that's coming from a hardware enthusiast. Get a console and shut up.


No.
Back to top
Frant1c




Posts: 311
Location: Not here.
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 19:46    Post subject:
Meh, sure its sad but I'll just have to pirate it to the 360 instead. And no I wouldnt buy one myself, but I'll just borrow my brothers.
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11335

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 20:08    Post subject:
Fuck em. First Star Wars game I won't buy Sad

Yes, I even have Mysteries of the Sith Sad


Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly
Back to top
NuclearShadow
Banned



Posts: 1948

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 20:17    Post subject:
Naish wrote:
From a business standpoint, they're being smart. So you can really just cry the fuck some more.

This platform is dead, and that's coming from a hardware enthusiast. Get a console and shut up.


I believe your half right. It most likely was a smart move that the game isn't coming to PC. My gut feelings tell me this game is going to be horrible and we all know PC gamers just don't accept horrible games. While on consoles they sell in the millions. Why should they waste money porting it to PC when it most likely won't sell.

As for this platform being dead your out of your fucking mind. Notice the trend that the consoles have been following? Ever since the Xbox consoles are becoming more and more like PC's. Its really more like a these consoles are our PC's half retarded cousin who trys to be like the PC. But the closer they get the more $ it takes to make them and more the consumer spends making PC hardware look more and more affordable and more capable then the consoles. This copycat behavior is working right now but it will bite them in the ass later on.
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 20:56    Post subject:
whats more dangerous than nerdrage? starwarsnerdrage.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 21:16    Post subject:
whats more dangerous than starwarsnerdrage? lotrnerdrage
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 21:33    Post subject:
nah starwars been around alot longer amongst the nerds, lotr only gained real nerd mainstream when the films came out.
Back to top
ShadowX




Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 21:38    Post subject:
Ow dear no PC , ow wait I got recently a XFlop 360 so I wont shed a tear on this Razz
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10797
Location: UK
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 21:59    Post subject:
looks crap anyway. f**k the k*nts


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
Back to top
Raap




Posts: 956

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:11    Post subject:
Doesn't the Xbox360 only have like 3 cores?
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:14    Post subject:
sli card. and a cpu. guess 3 yes then?
Back to top
yoyoxp




Posts: 567
Location: Dublin
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:15    Post subject:
Raap wrote:
Doesn't the Xbox360 only have like 3 cores?

Yep 3 Cell processor, hear the ps3 only uses 3 cells aswell out of the 7 in games and stuff Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes , not 100% sure about this

Nick
Back to top
Raap




Posts: 956

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:21    Post subject:
Bah, it's a ridiculous excuse then. The q6660 should be more than powerful enough, and by the time this silly game actually comes out quad core will probably be the norm, or at least close to it. Give another 6 months or so for the game to be converted to PC and it shouldn't be a problem at all.

Then again, it's happened many times before that developers have said a game wouldn't be out for the PC. Didn't they say that even about Mass Effect?
Back to top
sh0wst0pp3r




Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:32    Post subject:
That's "excuse" is pretty lame. They could just said they're not making PC version because it won't sell due to being sub-par, thus most people who download it won't really cash in. It's like PC-only Crysis, super-overhyped, an ok game in the long run, but expectation were so high, most people were dissapointed and end up not buying it. That's how PC market works now, you either go for quality (quality multiplayer!) or you won't sell, nobody eats shit around here, sorry. Look at Call of Duty 4, sells on all platforms, lots of people play it on all platforms, most people who liked it, bought it for multiplayer that is fun to play, everyone wins simply because the game is well made.
Back to top
Mr_Baggins




Posts: 1426

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:46    Post subject:
Oh, whatever, I'll play it on my x360 then. Don't give a shit whether it is on PC or not.


11th "Thou shalt not flash"
Back to top
shadow_D




Posts: 718

PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:52    Post subject:
The "excuse" might be lame. But what does it matter in reality? If they released it, they would get bashed for it being a lame console-port. It's the way it goes, no release on PC and people complain about that. If they release it people complain about it being a watered down console-port.
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 22:55    Post subject:
basically pc gamers are whiny bitches its your own fault.
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 23:38    Post subject:
i own a xbox360

And its utter shit compared to the PC

nuff said.

I dont see shit all "next gen" bout the 360 or PS3

Its simply laze/incapable devs... PC games have been scalable forever
Back to top
yoyoxp




Posts: 567
Location: Dublin
PostPosted: Sun, 18th May 2008 23:45    Post subject:
-=Cartoon=- wrote:
i own a xbox360

And its utter shit compared to the PC

nuff said.

I dont see shit all "next gen" bout the 360 or PS3

Its simply laze/incapable devs... PC games have been scalable forever

Same here, Lol @ xbox 360 not being able to play GTAIV >30FPS most times, also hear the PS3 GTAIV runs even slower Laughing Laughing , 21FPS at times lmao!

Nick
Back to top
avirox




Posts: 510

PostPosted: Mon, 19th May 2008 00:25    Post subject:
what resolution does the average console run games at? I hear gta4 on the xbox360 is like 720p which is 1280x720 right?


fear the led zeppelin that was!
Back to top
Page 1 of 5 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group