[PS3] Sony V BBC
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
twobells
Banned



Posts: 2878
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 14:54    Post subject: [PS3] Sony V BBC
Sony hits back at the BBC for an attack on Sony's support service and in particular the YROD.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/sony-tackles-bbc-over-ps3-failure-report


"Attention PS3 fans: author has both a 360 AND a PS3" tb was heard to say this morning.


Last edited by twobells on Thu, 24th Sep 2009 16:00; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:08    Post subject:
Sorry Sony, but if WATCHDOG are saying something - then it's the truth, and anything you say in defence is just a PR-spun bullshit concoction.

Watchdog is renowned for NOT taking shit from anyone, just printing the facts and dealing with cases properly.
Back to top
twobells
Banned



Posts: 2878
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:15    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Sorry Sony, but if WATCHDOG are saying something - then it's the truth, and anything you say in defence is just a PR-spun bullshit concoction.

Watchdog is renowned for NOT taking shit from anyone, just printing the facts and dealing with cases properly.


I had an amazing experience though with my PS3, admittedly it was under warranty but they sent out a bike courier the same day with a brand new unit; but you are correct in suggesting that Watchdog both takes no prisoners and carries out meticulous research.

tb
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:17    Post subject:
I have no opinions on the YLOD issue (I don't have a PS3, and none of the guys I know that DO have one have reported issues either) but I side with Watchdog on anything they print or show - because yeah, meticulous is exactly what they are.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:19    Post subject:
Watchdog served nobody with this report. Not only was it inaccurate, and banal to boot, but with their shoddy coverage they've only strengthened Sony's case and left those with broken PS3's out in the cold.

Not only that, but they effectively advertised and championed a third party repair service that charges similar fees to Sony but can't even guarantee what they do will fix the machine (indeed of those supposedly fix; many of them broken down later). They had the piece fronted by someone who works freelance for Microsoft and has written some hilariously biased stuff against the PS3.

All in all it justified the general opinion that Watchdog no longer serves the consumer but to generate ratings panders to sensationalist pap.


Last edited by Ispep on Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:22; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:20    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Sorry Sony, but if WATCHDOG are saying something - then it's the truth, and anything you say in defence is just a PR-spun bullshit concoction.

Watchdog is renowned for NOT taking shit from anyone, just printing the facts and dealing with cases properly.

I can't work out whether this is sarcasm or not. Living in the UK myself my immediate response is; "yes, this is sarcasm of the highest order Laughing"... surely you're not serious? Very Happy
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:25    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:

I can't work out whether this is sarcasm or not. Living in the UK myself my immediate response is; "yes, this is sarcasm of the highest order Laughing"... surely you're not serious? Very Happy


Sorry mate, I know you've got - and love - a PS3, but Sony are in the wrong is Watchdog say so. WD have always been at the forefront, exposing shoddy - and criminal - services in the UK.

I really don't care what anyone else says; but if Watchdog says something, then it's the truth and I'm FAR more likely to believe them than you, or Sony, or any one else.
Back to top
twobells
Banned



Posts: 2878
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:32    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:
Watchdog served nobody with this report. Not only was it inaccurate, and banal to boot, but with their shoddy coverage they've only strengthened Sony's case and left those with broken PS3's out in the cold.

Not only that, but they effectively advertised and championed a third party repair service that charges similar fees to Sony but can't even guarantee what they do will fix the machine (indeed of those supposedly fix; many of them broken down later). They had the piece fronted by someone who works freelance for Microsoft and has written some hilariously biased stuff against the PS3.

All in all it justified the general opinion that Watchdog no longer serves the consumer but to generate ratings panders to sensationalist pap.


I didn't see the package in question but traditionally Watchdog are very good at consumer protection, however having said that the BBC has been under close scrutiny in the last year or so for shoddy attention to detail as they farm out work (sub contract) which doesn't meet the BBC's strict professional standards.
Let me boot up IPlayer on the PS3 Wink and check it out.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:34    Post subject:
lol.

You're likely to believe anyone who says anything remotely negative against Sony more like. Seeing as you live in the UK and are an avid watcher and admirer of the program I suggest you go on iPlayer and watch it before commenting.

I think you'll change your mind.

Watchdog has changed since you last saw it Sabin.


Back to top
Munkeee




Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:37    Post subject:
Hell Nicky Campbell is a grade A wank but bringing anne robinson back shows what kind show this is , Throw in the rogue traders Montage in the middle and you generally have a laughing stock of a show , nearly as bad as the money saving expert THING that was on channel 5 with that martin cunting lewis


sabin1981 wrote:
but you know what Chinese whispers are like; some newbie will read your comment and suddenly run and spread it all over the internet that the new 2010 Banwave disables all your XBLA games when you're banned.

Ironic Statement #4756 from sabin


Last edited by Munkeee on Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:40; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 15:38    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:
lol.

You're likely to believe anyone who says anything remotely negative against Sony more like.


Whereas you can't stop singing their praises, despite shoddy firmware updates and massively overpriced hardware.

Who is in the wrong here? How about we just say "neither of us" and go on our merry way, huh?

Quote:

Seeing as you live in the UK and are an avid watcher and admirer of the program I suggest you go on iPlayer and watch it before commenting.

I think you'll change your mind.

Watchdog has changed since you last saw it Sabin.


I lived in the UK for 27 years, started moving to Norway less than two years ago, and I used to watch that program all the time.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 16:25    Post subject:
Quote:
Whereas you can't stop singing their praises, despite shoddy firmware updates and massively overpriced hardware.

Please. I have criticised many aspects of the PS3 and Sony in this very forum, firmware and high prices included. My posts are as objective as I can possibly be.

Quote:
I lived in the UK for 27 years, started moving to Norway less than two years ago, and I used to watch that program all the time.

Then you'd know what you were saying was complete garbage. I'm not attacking you, or defending Sony. I would have loved Watchdog to have covered this piece properly, with the facts, figures and substance to carry it - but they didn't. They alluded to a possible problem affecting a relatively infinitesimal number of people and that was it. Literally.

Trust me. Watch the piece. It's a joke, and in many respects it appears Watchdog know it's a joke - with a comedian fronting it, the acronym for the repair service, and the song segment which takes up something like 2 or 3 minutes (where they could have actually been saying stuff of substance). Your praise for Watchdog is extremely off kilter with reality.

So much so I'm inclined to believe you are taking the piss, that this is all just one big joke to confuse and scare me. I mean why else would you draw conclusions on a report you've not seen, from a program you've not watched recently - and from one whose standards have dropped considerably.


Back to top
me7




Posts: 3939

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 16:42    Post subject:
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 16:56    Post subject:
Although that is yet another article basing its numbers and reportage solely on an individual third party who profits from repairs to consoles out of warranty. The comparisons to RROD in terms of numbers are overegged for parity where there isn't any.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 17:05    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:
Although this is yet another article basing its numbers and reportage solely on a third party who profits from repairs to consoles out of warranty.


sigh.

So why is it fine to believe Sony's "reported failures" yet it's not right to believe MS? MS say they have less than 20% returns -- you call that bullshit and quote articles showing 55%++

Sony say they have less than one HALF of a percent to do with YLOD - we show articles showing considerably higher, and you call BS and try to justify it.


This is why I believe Watchdog over Sony. You're right, I haven't seen the report yet - but even by doing so, it's not going to make me suddenly run to Sony and offer free BJs.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 17:31    Post subject:
Quote:
So why is it fine to believe Sony's "reported failures" yet it's not right to believe MS? MS say they have less than 20% returns -- you call that bullshit and quote articles showing 55%++

I never said believe Sony, don't believe Microsoft, nor did I quote any article as you say. In fact I've no idea what you're blathering about here.

Quote:
Sony say they have less than one HALF of a percent to do with YLOD - we show articles showing considerably higher, and you call BS and try to justify it.

I'm not justifying anything, I'm calling into question the validity of lording over statistics from a single third party which profits from the circumstance. You can write a 100 page document on the matter but if your only source is a single third party... that profits from the circumstance... then yeah it's not exactly going to hold a lot of weight.

Quote:
This is why I believe Watchdog over Sony. You're right, I haven't seen the report yet - but even by doing so, it's not going to make me suddenly run to Sony and offer free BJs.

That explains a lot.


Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 17:40    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:

I never said believe Sony, don't believe Microsoft, nor did I quote any article as you say. In fact I've no idea what you're blathering about here.


Actually, I meant to say "everyone calls bullshit" but since I was talking to you at the time, I got my words mixed up - so I apologise for that. My point still stands; why is it ok for everyone to blast on MS and quote articles claiming "over 55% failure rate", which contradicts MS official claim of less than 20%, then at the same time fully believe Sony with their "Less than 1%" claim, and ignore external reports that it's closer to 40%?

Obvious selection is obvious, IMO.


Quote:

I'm not justifying anything, I'm calling into question the validity of lording over statistics from a single third party which profits from the circumstance. You can write a 100 page document on the matter but if your only source is a single third party... that profits from the circumstance... then yeah it's not exactly going to hold a lot of weight.


See above. Both Sony and MS profit from claiming lower return rates, yet it seems that only MS is the one being disbelieved. Whatever Sony say; everyone believes.

Sony says "less than 1% return" - I say bullshit; External figures show otherwise.
MS says "less than 20% return" - I say bullshit; External figures show otherwise.


Quote:

That explains a lot.


No, it doesn't. I don't believe a word Sony says (their actions have caused that) just as I don't believe a word Microsoft says (their actions have caused that) - but I do believe a trusted, proven, source like Watchdog.
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3939

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 19:35    Post subject:
Microsoft made one "mistake": they admitted that the RROD is real and raised warrenty to three years. While this policy is great for their customers it is bad for publicity. Sony used this to market their console as the reliable alternative to the X360 and they will do anything they can to supress information on the YLOD (including no extended warranty no matter how big the problem might be). This is the reason why will believe (almost) any other source over Sony.
Back to top
Bigperm




Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 19:36    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
If someone wants some background on YLOD: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-system-failure-article


That was a good article. Thanks for that.

Seems from the repair shops that both consoles have the same failure problems.

60/40 (360/PS3) ratio that come in for repair. But if you prorate(More 360 in the wild than PS3) that based on hardware sold; the PS3 has higher failures rates than the 360. Very interesting. Sony needs to increase the warranty to 3 years IMO.

Im thinking Sony has done a better job at covering up failures than MS. Maybe its time for me to sell my BC PS3 and get a standalone blu-ray player. Heck i just replaced two of my 360s that i got back from repair for new ones (ebayed the refurbished ones) so i can have 3 more years of warranty. Maybe this will be the new norm in consumer electronics. Hell i wish i would have sold my first 2 Ps1 and first Ps2 before they died.


Jenni wrote:
I drunk. I don't fucking care!
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2092

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 19:53    Post subject:
The Eurogamer article is as much a load of nonsense as the Watchdog report is.

For a start, if MS had not extended their warranty to 3 years then this shop would be seeing far more RROD's and E74 errors than they do now as most of the 360's out there are still within the warranty period and therefore go to MS for repair. If the warranty had not been extended then they would be seeing a lot more 360's than they do now. What would that do to the 60/40% ratio mentioned in the article? Rolling Eyes

Secondly, you simply cannot use the numbers from a small 3rd rarty repair shop to generate any sort of reliable comparison between the two consoles. The sample size is too small to be considered relevent.

And thirdly, out of all of the 360's that I have come into contact with in the real world have suffered from some sort of failure at some point, with the exception of only 1. That's 1 out of 10 or 11 that's still going. That's appalling reliability by anyones standards I'm sure.

Out of all of the PS3's that I know of which is a similar number, I only know of one failure. And that was my own PS3 which I was able to repair by replacing the laser.
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3939

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 20:00    Post subject:
RMFX wrote:
Secondly, you simply cannot use the numbers from a small 3rd rarty repair shop to generate any sort of reliable comparison between the two consoles. The sample size is too small to be considered relevent.

And thirdly, out of all of the 360's that I have come into contact with in the real world have suffered from some sort of failure at some point, with the exception of only 1. That's 1 out of 10 or 11 that's still going. That's appalling reliability by anyones standards I'm sure.


So a shop that repairs 20 consoles a day is too small to matter but the 11 consoles you know are enough?

Well, I know exactly 5 X360 consoles neither of which has sufferd from the RROD (honestly) so I could claim that the failure rate is 0% ...but I am not arrogant enough Razz
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 20:02    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
RMFX wrote:
Secondly, you simply cannot use the numbers from a small 3rd rarty repair shop to generate any sort of reliable comparison between the two consoles. The sample size is too small to be considered relevent.

And thirdly, out of all of the 360's that I have come into contact with in the real world have suffered from some sort of failure at some point, with the exception of only 1. That's 1 out of 10 or 11 that's still going. That's appalling reliability by anyones standards I'm sure.


So a shop that repairs 20 consoles a day is too small to matter but the 11 consoles you know are enough?

Well, I know exactly 5 X360 consoles neither of which has sufferd from the RROD (honestly) so I could claim that the failure rate is 0% ...but I am not arrogant enough Razz


ZING!!
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2092

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 20:17    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
RMFX wrote:
Secondly, you simply cannot use the numbers from a small 3rd rarty repair shop to generate any sort of reliable comparison between the two consoles. The sample size is too small to be considered relevent.

And thirdly, out of all of the 360's that I have come into contact with in the real world have suffered from some sort of failure at some point, with the exception of only 1. That's 1 out of 10 or 11 that's still going. That's appalling reliability by anyones standards I'm sure.


So a shop that repairs 20 consoles a day is too small to matter but the 11 consoles you know are enough?

Well, I know exactly 5 X360 consoles neither of which has sufferd from the RROD (honestly) so I could claim that the failure rate is 0% ...but I am not arrogant enough Razz


I'm not saying that my numbers are accurate. Infact, quite the opposite. I'm using my experiences to show that on such a small sample size the numbers certainly cannot be trusted and it looks like you agree with me because you've made a similar comment in your own post.

20 consoles a day, based on the warranty discrepancies between the 2 manufacturers is too small of a sample size.
Back to top
RMFX




Posts: 2092

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 20:18    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
me7 wrote:
RMFX wrote:
Secondly, you simply cannot use the numbers from a small 3rd rarty repair shop to generate any sort of reliable comparison between the two consoles. The sample size is too small to be considered relevent.

And thirdly, out of all of the 360's that I have come into contact with in the real world have suffered from some sort of failure at some point, with the exception of only 1. That's 1 out of 10 or 11 that's still going. That's appalling reliability by anyones standards I'm sure.


So a shop that repairs 20 consoles a day is too small to matter but the 11 consoles you know are enough?

Well, I know exactly 5 X360 consoles neither of which has sufferd from the RROD (honestly) so I could claim that the failure rate is 0% ...but I am not arrogant enough Razz


ZING!!


ZING??
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 20:45    Post subject:
*nods* Zing.
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3939

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 21:47    Post subject:
This repair-shop interview by digital foundry is still the biggest non-biased statistic I've seen so far. I'm never sure about MS numbers, but since they've been honest with the RROD issue I still take them seriously. Sony on the other hand does not like to admit weaknesses on their systems (remember the PS2 DVD-drive issue where buyers had to sue Sony in order to get repairs) and attacking a TV show just because they say that there is a YLOD and repair consoles seems like they have something to hide...
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 21:49    Post subject:
It seems like it because that's the way you want to spin it evidently.


Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 21:59    Post subject:
Ispep wrote:
It seems like it because that's the way you want to spin it evidently.


And it seems like you just want to spin it in the opposite way, by claiming that it's all bullshit Sad That's why I'm arguing back against you, not out of some misguided loyalty to MS (they killed my 360 with the hidden, low profile, killer; the E74) and certainly not out of misguided hatred of Sony (nothing misguided about it, my reasons for hating that goddamn company are self-evident - yet I still buy their hardware)

No.. I'm arguing back because you are absolutely steadfast AGAINST anyone saying the PS3 has hardware issues as well as the 360. Maybe nowhere near as widespread, but they are there - and denying it by denigrating anything or anyone that tries to bring this to light, is really just insulting, to be honest.
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 22:25    Post subject:
Where do you even come up with this shit? I never said anything like that at all. Go back and read this thread from beginning to end. You're arguing against me because you're incapable of rational discussion within a thread containing the words Sony and PS3. Simple as that. You've said as much yourself, and we all know this from threads gone by.


Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Sep 2009 22:29    Post subject:
No, I'm incapable of having a rational discussion involving SONY. I have nothing against the PS3 itself.
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group