| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 21:44 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 21:47 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 22:36 Post subject: |
|
|
nah don't think so but they tried to analyze the techniques reloaded was using to make this executable run stable (what wasn't at least the case with the original pe).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 22:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| SuggarRay wrote: | | nah don't think so but they tried to analyze the techniques reloaded was using to make this executable run stable (what wasn't at least the case with the original pe). |
The "instability" was obviously in the securom code, some of which rld/battery got rid of. I'm sure they didn't actively do anything to make it more stable, lolz wtf ...
"perhaps a member of ubisoft is from reloaded"
lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 22:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| VGAdeadcafe wrote: | | SuggarRay wrote: | | nah don't think so but they tried to analyze the techniques reloaded was using to make this executable run stable (what wasn't at least the case with the original pe). |
The "instability" was obviously in the securom code, some of which rld/battery got rid of. I'm sure they didn't actively do anything to make it more stable, lolz wtf ...
"perhaps a member of ubisoft is from reloaded"
lol |
now what's your opinion about this case whiz?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 23:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 23:36 Post subject: |
|
|
http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1991064316/m/1381029176?r=8971050276#8971050276
| Quote: | We’re looking into this further as this was not the UK Support team that posted this, however if it is an executable that does not need the disc I doubt it has come from an external source. There’d be very little point doing so when we already own the original unprotected executable.
As soon as we find out more about this we’ll let you know. |
but i bet the "guy" who uploaded it took the rld one
but mabe someone hacked their site and put it up by his own:0 conspiracy theories ftw
yes
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Jul 2008 23:51 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 19th Jul 2008 00:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| VGAdeadcafe wrote: | | SuggarRay wrote: | | nah don't think so but they tried to analyze the techniques reloaded was using to make this executable run stable (what wasn't at least the case with the original pe). |
The "instability" was obviously in the securom code, some of which rld/battery got rid of. I'm sure they didn't actively do anything to make it more stable, lolz wtf ...
"perhaps a member of ubisoft is from reloaded"
lol |
researching is usually a good idea... the game was protected with safedisc......
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leftos
Posts: 1159
Location: Patras, Greece
|
| Posted: Sat, 19th Jul 2008 01:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Wait. Did they lose the original, unprotected exe or something? You know, the one that comes post-development and pre-copyprotection.
[ i5 2500K (@4.2GHz) / GIGABYTE Z77MX-D3H / 8GB Corsair XMS / GIGABYTE GTX460 1GB OC / 640+750 GB WD Caviar Black ]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SuTuRa
Posts: 2445
Location: NFOHump
|
| Posted: Sat, 19th Jul 2008 07:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| Leftos wrote: | | Wait. Did they lose the original, unprotected exe or something? You know, the one that comes post-development and pre-copyprotection. |
Well said... It´s kinda strange really...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 19th Jul 2008 07:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| evlncrn8 wrote: | | VGAdeadcafe wrote: | | SuggarRay wrote: | | nah don't think so but they tried to analyze the techniques reloaded was using to make this executable run stable (what wasn't at least the case with the original pe). |
The "instability" was obviously in the securom code, some of which rld/battery got rid of. I'm sure they didn't actively do anything to make it more stable, lolz wtf ...
"perhaps a member of ubisoft is from reloaded"
lol |
researching is usually a good idea... the game was protected with safedisc...... |
OK, I meant the instability was probably in the protection, not the game code. I doubt the cracker patched the game. Geee, replace the word securom with safedisc !
@ Leftos :
Maybe there was miscommunication between the development team and the publisher or their "game support" section
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
javlar
Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 17:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Serious case of We did it for the lulz.
Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 19:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Stupid topic. You cant steal something is already yours. Cracked or not - that exe file is their intelect. property, they have all rights
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 20th Jul 2008 22:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| KrutojPoc wrote: | | Stupid topic. You cant steal something is already yours. Cracked or not - that exe file is their intelect. property, they have all rights |
Completely agree.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 00:36 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 00:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| KrutojPoc wrote: | | Stupid topic. You cant steal something is already yours. Cracked or not - that exe file is their intelect. property, they have all rights |
We didn't say it was illegal, we say it was immoral and LAME !!!!!
Oh, and funny !!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 00:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Stupid topic. You cant steal something is already yours. Cracked or not - that exe file is their intelect. property, they have all rights |
well, that's arguable, but that's not the point, and you're stupid if you can't see that
they so vehemently enforce the copy protection and ban anyone even discussing it on the boards, denying the protection's involvement in any trouble a user might have, and then release this cracked file as a 'fix', clearly catching them with their hypocritical pants down on all that
it's just a fortunate bonus that they did this by 'stealing' it from the very enemies they oppose, thus validating the entire crack movement
then again, this could also be said for all the rereleased abandonware games that carry a cracked .exe, but not with equal irony
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 00:55 Post subject: |
|
|
also for splinter cell double agent UBI haved released the crack into the dvd. someone remember this?
they are unpredictables. splinter cell caos theory was been uncracked for about an year and then for some of their last games they haved released cracks lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 02:07 Post subject: |
|
|
You honestly think UBI gives 2 shits about this? EA is NOTHING compared to Ubisoft.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaLexy
Posts: 3027
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon, 21st Jul 2008 10:46 Post subject: |
|
|
You mean UBI is nothing compared to EA !? EA is for sure the shittiest Developer and Publisher in the whole wide world, they bring buggy Games and patches after months where nobody is playin anymore. You wanna a list ? Here: NfS series, C&C3 TW/KW, Battlefield, LotR, and, and ....
About the File from Ubisoft, its a weak move and funny to look but as some allready said, its there piece of shit so they can do what they want 
In my Eyes the grps are not so hated as suspected 
My SysProfile ッ
I ΓУPΞ LIҜΞ Д БФSS, УФЦЯ ДЯGЦMΞИΓ I$ IИVДLłD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
