Page 1 of 1 |
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 13:22 Post subject: [XBOX360] RUMOR: Next Xbox to be “Forward-Compatible” |
|
 |
Kind of interesting..
http://xboxevolved.e-mpire.com/article/3rd_generation_Xbox/4902.html
Quote: |
Imagine playing Gears of War 3 on your Xbox 360 it looks and plays good right? Well imagine that the year after it comes out you go out to buy the next Xbox and it looks even better, it plays even better. Features in the new controller are utilized with the game, the graphics do not only look sharper, but the draw distance is better, the speed is better, framerate, and there are even new features, perhaps even levels via DLC for the game on the third-generation Xbox. GoW3 is of course an example of what this could mean, past the forward-compatibility information, Xbox Evolved has not been given any other information about the next generation of Xbox.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 17:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
they cannot even make their console backward compatible.
So i consider this pure BS, until they prove me wrong.
and i know they wont be able to do it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bigperm
Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
Honestly it easier than making it backwards compatible. Its exactly the same a PC games. Games will have low, medium and high detail settings like PC, only it will be automatic based on the console gen you have. Quite easy to implement IMHO and a great idea.
Jenni wrote: | I drunk. I don't fucking care! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
what a fucking stupid idea why even make a new console if all games will work on the old one no one will buy it. microsoft may be idiots when it comes to consoles but they are not that stupid
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
Because people want to have all the great gfx, smooth fps, new controller, etc.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Support81
Banned
Posts: 332
Location: At home
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 18:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
So..... Are we talking about consoles or computers here? ?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 15th Oct 2008 19:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeah right... Because every single game developer will know exactly what hardware the next console generation will have 3 or 4 years in the future, so they can adjust the shaders and everything right now. Fucking BS.
This was the same argument with many PC games, especially Crysis was supposed to look better when the hardware gets available. Now looking at it it was all a joke.
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”
- Albert Camus
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Horrordee
Soderator
Posts: 8858
Location: England
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 22nd Oct 2008 12:01 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 22nd Oct 2008 13:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
I absolutely loathe this idea
We'll end up with lazier programmers not squeezing as much juice from the hardware
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 22nd Oct 2008 14:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
will end up with a new console every 6 month
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 22nd Oct 2008 19:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
this is BULL S. you know why its like saying that a game that has now lets say pixelshader 2 will in the future have pixelshader 4 .... i don't say its not possible BUT if this is the new way MS should change the patches size to 1gig and a HDD must Tag
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |