| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 26th Oct 2008 03:22 Post subject: [NR] Underworld 3: Rise of the Lycans (January 2009) |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Oct 2008 03:23 Post subject: |
|
|
so it's a prequel to the first part?
in any case quality movies about vamps are welcome
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Oct 2008 06:50 Post subject: |
|
|
i thought the first one was ok - mostly due to beckinsale in leather
but the second one was just baaaaaaaaaaad - even the sex scene didn't save it
that stupidity then grew to be die hard 4 with the same director
maybe this one is better, now that we have a new director giving it a shot
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Oct 2008 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
i actually liked 2nd part more
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 00:01 Post subject: |
|
|
really?
they just dumped all the mythology stuff i liked on the first one and made it into a collection of the most ridiculous action pieces imaginable
unless if you actually watched it for the silly action bits
somehow all the characters turned into paper aswell and the dark and moody music score which i loved on the original also turned into generic uninteresting mush
not to say the first one was anything really special
but some of that modernized vampire mythology, and what the blade tv series was turning into toward it's end before being cancelled is something i'd really like to see more of
but all we get are silly splatter films or action-piece rollercoasters like underworld2 or disguised teen dramas like true blood or buffy
that's what i fell in love with in vampire masquerade: bloodlines - the consistent mythology with minimal silly business
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 00:11 Post subject: |
|
|
maybe u taking movies way too srsly
first was hardly an unimaginable masterpiece, infact it was an average action-vamp flick with dodgy sfx compared to 5 yo Blade
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cohen
Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 03:16 Post subject: |
|
|
first one was really good. I went through a stage where I was watching it at least once a week. I really loved the story and atmosphere. The acting was pretty good for the genre of film too.
troll detected by SiN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 03:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Bill Nighy saved nr 1.
2 was shite, and nr 3 will definitely be shite.
Rhona Mitra is so fucking hot, though.
8 out of 10 dentists prefer zipfero to competing brands(fraich3 and Mutantius)!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 08:55 Post subject: |
|
|
hot ? for me she's fucking ugly. masculine , ugly ass face. hot body ugly face.
bring Kate back for Underworld 4 ! 
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 09:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Liked 1st one, 2nd not so much. But all in all I don't have anything against vampire movies, so I'm probably gonna watch it ...
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson | chiv wrote: | | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 19:25 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
