Page 1 of 4 |
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 20:09 Post subject: [HARDWARE] 360 is at its MAX |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 20:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
Considering EA's PS3 games, it's very easy to see what he means; PS3 games (by EA) still have long way to go until they reach the quality of the 360 games (by EA). 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 20:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Mortibus wrote: | yeah coz Assassins Creed, Gta 4, Ghostbusters and others with performance and graphical issues all been developed and published by ea |
I didn't mention other publishers and developers, as my intention wasn't to start a flame war. It is a known fact EA's 360 ports for the PS3 are less then optimal at best.
BTW, no need to fanboi up with smileys.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 20:40 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 20:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
"I think Microsoft is on a roll right now. They're doing really well. If I was Sony, I would have a headache, to be honest."
Well said...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 21:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
I feel a console war thread building up here...
ruuuun!
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 22:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
and ???
what
everybody knows that, comparing those to PC
xbox 360 its like a fine tuned low end 3 core AMD with a high end integrated mobile lappy ATI gfx and shared 512 ram = plays well, has nice textures but sucks at large maps
ps3 its like high end 8 core Intel (well its only 6 cores the others are locked) with low end bottlenecking Gf 7900 with its own 256ram "which can output resolutions from 480i/576i SD that are later upscaled to 720p/1080p" and separated ram 256 for other processes = plays well, had shitty textures (low ram) but it owns xbox360 by having big maps
xbox360 = having better textures and high resolutions in games but at the costs of lag (example : 1-2 sec before you see the physics effects your game fezzes for this 1 sec... seen on loot of games [new starwars, Ninja Blade, gears etc.. ]) and sometimes missing effects
ps3 = you have 480i/576i SD thats upscaled to 720p/1080p , and low resolution textures that look horrible BUT you have all the bell and whistles with no lag (physics effects are instant no waiting time)
But yeah this is EA and they didn't talked ABOUT THE HARDWARE no dofus they have talked about the market share ... So by "I think that we've maxed out the 360 but we haven't maxed out the PS3" they meant 360 has shitload of games when PS3 has none...
they are so many genres on XBox360 you can pick and choose what game you like, on PS3 you play all you can find... make enough hype about something and PS3 whores will buy anything = PROFIT$$$$
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 19th Jun 2009 22:56 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 01:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ok 1 guys says the xbox is on its max and a other guy says its not , personaly I dont give a crap i love my box but i also love my ps3 both have dif games i want .
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 01:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 02:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 16:02; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 02:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
just buy both consoles you cheap ass mofos then you get too play ALL games.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
grimmmy
Posts: 1014
Location: London
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 02:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
maxed out or not, the 360 will sell more atm due to its price and the fact that games are virtually identical to their PS3 counterparts. In many cases we're seeing the xbox still looking or running better.
Sony will be its own downfall at this rate. They need to take advantage of the market and get PS3's out on the streets. They're constantly being outsold by the wii and 360 and ultimately it probably comes down to price.
The PS3 as a media center is no longer applicable. You can buy a better BR player and an xbox for the price of a 80Gig PS3.
Now with the whole activision thing (remember they own infinity ward, demonware, neversoft, red octane, etc etc) its trouble for Sony. The last thing they need is less games on their system, exclusive or not.
Intel Core i7-4790K 4.00GHz - 32GB Kingston HyperX - Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 7 - EVGA GTX 980 TI SC 6GB - Asus ROG Swift PG278Q
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kalato
Posts: 1492
Location: Finland and UK
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 02:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
I got both consoles and I use the PS3 more for multimedia advantages.
I like bum.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cohen
Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 05:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
So can they improve on gameplay now instead? Or is that also TO THE MAX?
Fucking ten+ year old games are better then we get nowadays.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Gun
Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 05:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
Nailbiter wrote: | So can they improve on gameplay now instead? Or is that also TO THE MAX?
Fucking ten+ year old games are better then we get nowadays. |
Have to agree here. Though I found Demon Souls to be an exception.
1 stripe purple belt in JiuJitsu (good grief this takes FOREVER hahah)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 06:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
Nailbiter wrote: | So can they improve on gameplay now instead? Or is that also TO THE MAX?
Fucking ten+ year old games are better then we get nowadays. |
well, at least they are trying to bring in new features with the natal peripheral. with a big emphasis on trying - i'd be surprised if it turns out to be anything more than a shitty little gimmick for some kiddie stuff or the oxymoron called fitness games.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 06:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
kalato wrote: | I got both consoles and I use the PS3 more for multimedia advantages. |
The PS3 should ONLY be used for multimedia. Not gaming. Period.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 06:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
bushwacka wrote: | i'd be surprised if it turns out to be anything more than a shitty little gimmick for some kiddie stuff. |
Which is what the PS3 really is. Sony is the greatest when it comes to tricking their gullible consumers.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 12:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 16:02; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cohen
Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 13:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
Why all the ps3 hate?
Its a fucking powerful system, it can handle graphics better than the 360. Its more expensive because it has a blu ray player built in. The good games are coming, just wait for next year.
troll detected by SiN
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 13:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
wgem wrote: | Why all the ps3 hate?
Its a fucking powerful system, it can handle graphics better than the 360. Its more expensive because it has a blu ray player built in. The good games are coming, just wait for next year. |
Proof please.
Watercooled 5950X | AORUS Master X570 | Asus RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC | 64Gb RAM | 1Tb 970 Evo Plus + 2Tb 660p | etc etc
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 20th Jun 2009 14:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
wgem wrote: | Why all the ps3 hate?
Its a fucking powerful system, it can handle graphics better than the 360. Its more expensive because it has a blu ray player built in. The good games are coming, just wait for next year. |
Technically the Xbox GPU is slightly better while the PS3 CPU is better. As for the Xbox being maxed out, it's been released in 2005, so it's completely logical. Sure the PS3 has room for improvement, but that's to catch up with the Xbox. Maybe it's because the Playstation has always been hard to code for, but some PS3 games run worse or look worse than the Xbox counterpart.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |