| Page 1 of 22 |
|
|
 Posted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 16:50 Post subject: Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2 |
|
 |
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas 2
- Official web page: LINK
- Publisher: UBIsoft
- Developer: UBIsoft Montreal
- Genre: FPS
- Release date: US: March 2008
- Story/Description:
| Quote: |
Another milking of one of the best franchises done by the idiots over at UBI. Another ruined game dumbed down for people who can't handle the slightest bit of strategy WOOOHOOOO
|
- Multiplayer: Yes
- System requirements:
| Quote: |
Well since the first one ran like crap, expect this one to require quad core, GTX x 4 and 8 gigs of memory, and hope it doesn't stutter.
|
- News article/s: Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 Announced IGN
- Preview: N/A
- Review: N/A
- Screenshots: N/A
- Trailer: N/A
Last edited by SpykeZ on Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 17:09; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73194
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 17:07 Post subject: |
|
|
There's a screenshot there, so you could use that. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 17:08 Post subject: |
|
|
wow....didn't even think of that lol, too early 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73194
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2007 17:10 Post subject: |
|
|
 About the requirements, I just hope they use a newer version of the UE3... It will then have the generic performance most games have (great on a 8800GTX ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 20:52 Post subject: |
|
|
well.. first one sucked on PC so I guess this won't be any better.
It was great fun on the xbox 360 though, so I'm looking forward to this game on the 360, but not on PC.
coop ftw!
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 21:01 Post subject: |
|
|
SUCKED ON PC!!!!! No way, I really enjoyed it!. Oh well I guess I am one of those that never really feel confortable with a game controller playing FPS.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23283
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 21:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Im with CaptainCox on this one, works excellent on my 7800 card.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 22:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Great Game. A lot of action, it runs good on my 7600GT, 1GB, C2D 6300. Sometimes the framerate drops but it's not a big deal.
I hope Vegas 2 will be like the first one.
CCIE
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 22:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| Surray wrote: | | well the game itself wasn't bad on pc, it was the same as it was on the 360, but it just ran like shit on my 7900 gtx so maybe that's why I never bothered with it on the PC. |
Ran poorly on 7900GTX? LOL. When the game came out, I was still using a 6800GT, and it ran fine. I finished the game and had loads of fun. It was a little choppy at certain points due to my poor vid card, but no big deal. I now have an 8800GT, so may give it another run! Totally forgot how much fun it was. Can't wait for the 2nd one.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Feb 2008 22:48 Post subject: |
|
|
If you looked at the recent video's, they have a new rank system. The points you get in singleplayer are the same in multiplayer which is awesome.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Feb 2008 01:14 Post subject: |
|
|
I really can't wait to play this online - hopefully itll be available on Steam
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Feb 2008 07:28 Post subject: |
|
|
only thing that bothered me about the orginal was that it tend to corrupt the savegame, and you didn't have the oppertunity to save on different slots. Which meant you had to start from the begining if it corrupted the savegame halfthru the game....
Played it thru co-op on the PS3 version though and had a blast.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jar0
Posts: 376
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Feb 2008 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
No, Assasin's Creed has been delayed to march 28th.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Feb 2008 22:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| Jar0 wrote: | | No, Assasin's Creed has been delayed to march 28th. |
21st + 7 days = 28th.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73194
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Feb 2008 22:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| djaoni wrote: | | Jar0 wrote: | | No, Assasin's Creed has been delayed to march 28th. |
21st + 7 days = 28th. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 03:32 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73194
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 12:06 Post subject: |
|
|
GRAW 1/2 PC were actually decent, and had nothing to do with the console crap (which is also decent lol, but has nothing to do with GR). The first wasn't liked that much because it had very high end requirements for its time, and the second had very hard and too accurate (borderline cheating) AI, but from gameplay standpoint, they were great.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 12:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| Panzer86 wrote: | but Ghost recon advanced warrior or what it was called was pure console garbage fps.
And i like console games but please, fps should stay on the PC, Coop fps can be fun on the console but thats it. |
The PC version was developed by a different developer, it was also a very different game.
some textures and models were used in both games, but other than that it was a different game.
the missions were different, the interface was different, the console version was actually third person while the PC version was first person.
It was overall a lot more action oriented on the xbox360.
GRAW 1 and 2 did feel pretty unfinished, but they definitely weren't console garbage.
Just decent PC games.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 15:24 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know what was the deal with GRAW on PC. People complained that they didn't want any action based consoltype of GR, and one that was more like the original GR. Grin did exactly that and then they got shit because they made it a totally different version of the Xbox360 version. However, it wasn't optimized very well...but if I recall right the original GR wasn't either when it was released back in the days.
I do think both the consol versions of GRAW and PC version where good in their own ways.
I loved Rainbow Six Vegas, except that thing about it corrupting my savegames....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 15:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| shadow_D wrote: | I don't know what was the deal with GRAW on PC. People complained that they didn't want any action based consoltype of GR, and one that was more like the original GR. Grin did exactly that and then they got shit because they made it a totally different version of the Xbox360 version. However, it wasn't optimized very well...but if I recall right the original GR wasn't either when it was released back in the days.
I do think both the consol versions of GRAW and PC version where good in their own ways.
I loved Rainbow Six Vegas, except that thing about it corrupting my savegames.... |
It was nothing like the old GR's is why so many people were so pissed off.
and I do believe the GR series was the only game(s) around people forgave the shitty AI willingly. Oh this has shitty AI? Who cares..it's Ghost fucking Recon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 16:46 Post subject: |
|
|
| SpykeZ wrote: | | shadow_D wrote: | I don't know what was the deal with GRAW on PC. People complained that they didn't want any action based consoltype of GR, and one that was more like the original GR. Grin did exactly that and then they got shit because they made it a totally different version of the Xbox360 version. However, it wasn't optimized very well...but if I recall right the original GR wasn't either when it was released back in the days.
I do think both the consol versions of GRAW and PC version where good in their own ways.
I loved Rainbow Six Vegas, except that thing about it corrupting my savegames.... |
It was nothing like the old GR's is why so many people were so pissed off.
and I do believe the GR series was the only game(s) around people forgave the shitty AI willingly. Oh this has shitty AI? Who cares..it's Ghost fucking Recon |
Hmm, well I saw it pretty much as the old one. You get a team, get to choose weapons, dropped in a zone. Use the map to order around your teammates and you could also give them order on the fly. The only difference I saw was the setting, GRAW was set in mexico, while GR had a more middle europen based missions, aslo GR had a more open terrrain while GRAW had urbansetting. It also had the same stiff movements and same crappy AI (as you pointed out).
I'm not flaming you here, but what was in the old GR that you didn't have in the new one? Give me a perspective 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2008 16:48 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 22 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
