Drive Terrain FWD/RWD/AWD/4WD ?
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next

FWD/RWD/AWD/4WD ?
FWD
23%
 23%  [ 4 ]
RWD
47%
 47%  [ 8 ]
AWD
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
4WD
29%
 29%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 17

Hierofan
Banned



Posts: 3807
Location: Internets
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 14:14    Post subject: Drive Terrain FWD/RWD/AWD/4WD ?
So , which do you prefer and currently drive??
i drive fwd , but rwd is alot more fun


Back to top
Kamikaze666




Posts: 3550

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 14:42    Post subject:
my real life car is fwd like most other cars, but I would prefer a rwd for some drifting fun.

real drivers choose rwd!


Quote:
PC awesome button = Uninstall!
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 15:44    Post subject:
If I lived in a mountain id go for 4WD or AWD, but since I don't...

...RWD. Just sad japanese RWD cars are so expensive. If it wasn't that damn expensive to own a car id get a 3 series as winter car.

I might get a Laurel tho, lol Very Happy
Back to top
cnZ
Banned



Posts: 3091

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 16:11    Post subject:
rwd obviously as i prefer bigger engines.

though interesting read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_layout


yes
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 16:37    Post subject:
Back to top
Bigperm




Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 17:15    Post subject:
4WD because i live in Calgary. F150 and 911 C4


Jenni wrote:
I drunk. I don't fucking care!
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 17:43    Post subject:
Who the hell picked 4WD over AWD? I hope they know the difference.

Anyway I'd go with FWD for a commute for fuel economy and ease of driving + acceptable bad weather traction.

RWD for a pure sports car as it's the best platform for going fast around corners.

AWD if offered in that same sports car because you get tons of grip at the expense of weight due to the extra differential/transfer case/etc.

4WD i'm not very fond of. How many cars besides pick ups come with full time 4WD now days?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 18:03    Post subject:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
Who the hell picked 4WD over AWD?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-wheel_drive
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 18:45    Post subject:
Why did you link me to a wikipedia page?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 18:53    Post subject:
There is a nice section that explains somewhat what the differences are. Also a list of newer cars that use a 4WD system. Smile
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 19:33    Post subject:
Well I can't speak for the others, but (driving a Land Rover Discovery) it looks like I did vote in the wrong section going by that wiki page. It's pretty confusing with terms like 4x4, 4WD and AWD, especially when one AWD system can be completely different to another...

...but whatever, it has 4 driven wheels and they all get muddy.


Back to top
Mchart




Posts: 7314

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 19:50    Post subject:
This poll doesn't take into account that many cars that claim to be AWD/4x4 aren't real AWD/4x4 all the time.

Take for instance the system used by Honda in their 'AWD' autos. The system only engages on a limited basis, and it isn't connected to the rear wheels by a real driveshaft.

Honestly, RWD with a good LSD is the best way to go. You get just as good traction in the winter with such a setup when compared to a FWD system (And most FWD's out there don't have a LSD, so they may indeed perform worse then a RWD system)
Back to top
Hierofan
Banned



Posts: 3807
Location: Internets
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 21:19    Post subject:
Mchart wrote:
This poll doesn't take into account that many cars that claim to be AWD/4x4 aren't real AWD/4x4 all the time.

it is optional isnt it ?
you use the awd when you actually need it , during winter , rough roads , you have to insane to have it on all the time , it'll just guzzle up fuel .
oh .. don't know about newer audis but the 90s era had permanent quattro .


Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:12    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
deelix wrote:
If I lived in a mountain id go for 4WD

http://www.carseverything.com/259/2010-lamborghini-murcielago-performance-specs.html
http://www.carseverything.com/259/2010-lamborghini-gallardo-performance-specs.html
Wonder how much damage I would make on my first tour up the hill

Think id go for a Subaru Forester or a Land Cruiser. But I feel the Land Cruiser would mostly be overkill... its not like im driving in the middle east, lol.


Also I would not like to have an Gallardo just because Akon got one
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:20    Post subject:
Akon's cool, I like his music. Very Happy He also knows his cars, it seems. Razz

Murchielago SV - Mmmm I'm drooling here!
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:31    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Akon's cool, I like his music. Very Happy He also knows his cars, it seems. Razz

Murchielago SV - Mmmm I'm drooling here!
Would be cool to test one, but owning a supercar is far from cool :/
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:42    Post subject:
Why, because you can't afford it? Razz At any rate, a Gallardo is not a supercar, it is a cool, humped up Audi TT. Smile
Back to top
Ispep
VIP Member



Posts: 4117

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:43    Post subject:
Apart from the fact the Lamborghini is prone to spontaneously setting on fire. They had loads of pictures on Top Gear and video footage of a fire crew trying to put out the blaze on BBC News.


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:47    Post subject:
Yeah, seen the pics in the last show. No idea what's up with that. It's only the Gallardo model, and I think it only applies to the older models, but still...
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:48    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Why, because you can't afford it? Razz At any rate, a Gallardo is not a supercar, it is a cool, humped up Audi TT. Smile
yeah, and its damn unnecessary unless you live close to the autobahn or Nรผrburgring or something. Not only the car itself. Insurance, tyres. And the fact that they are far from practical. In other words you just can't have one if you live in a big city. Parallel parking without any/next to no view behind you, not all of them got power steering either.

But sure... if you like to look at a cool car in your garage, some people might think its worth it. But lambos are meant to be driven tho, not like those old classics you drive once year.

But well there are driver friendly cars like the NSX, but its pretty rare and out of production... so its far from cheap.

And yeah I know Lambo is German now Very Happy But id still say its a supercar. Thought it had the same engine as an R8 or something tho :/ Not sure about it.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:55    Post subject:
Oh I agree with you on that, for people like us, owning such a car is silly. But someone who earns that much money, he doesn't care about that stuff. If you had unlimited cash to throw, you would drive anything you want. Like some people have 35 cars in their lots. Do they drive them all the time? Of course not, they just enjoy having them and drive them occasionally.

And I didn't say Lamborghinis are not super cars, I said the Gallardo model is not. The Murciellago is, and in fact a very good one.

You compare a Lamborghini to a Honda? Laughing
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:03    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:

You compare a Lamborghini to a Honda? Laughing
I sure do Very Happy

NSX and Supra <3

Fucking japanese manufacturers are fucking "green" and boring atm...
Only nissan and mitsubishi that make proper fast cars. No not subaru anymore... the new Impreza is a hot hatch ffs :S

Well maybe Lexus too, but its like Mercs and BMWs, overpriced imo.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:05    Post subject:
Japanese cars Smile
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:08    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Japanese cars Smile
They invented drifting... far fom zZzZz Wink



But yeah, most toyotas are zzzz, same with most hondas too. New ones are not _that_ dull tho. Avensis, new accord, Mazda 6 etc.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:10    Post subject:
Drifting Laughing
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:12    Post subject:
Shocked

btw, I think we ruined the thread Very Happy Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:14    Post subject:
Well not much to discuss about layouts anyway lol.

I like this car: Toyota iQ



Not sure if I can fit in there, but damn, you can park this gem anywhere you want lol.
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:39    Post subject:
Intelligent? Well... it has 4 seats, but they either got to be people without legs or kids Seen a car review. Id rather go for a Auris, same engine... ofc a little heavier but 4 doors and more space ftw

Btw, I think you only can get it in white. Starting to see them on the roads here, and all iv seen are white :/
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 02:09    Post subject:
Lol, fuck 4 seats, if I was to get this, I'd use it as a single-seat cart-like car! Laughing

About the color, yeah, white is pretty bad for any car actually (my sig comes into play here), but there surely is a way to paint it aftermarket. Smile
Back to top
Hierofan
Banned



Posts: 3807
Location: Internets
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 07:25    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Well not much to discuss about layouts anyway lol.

I like this car: Toyota iQ



Not sure if I can fit in there, but damn, you can park this gem anywhere you want lol.

well , i'd rather buy an Aygo which is cheaper , IQ is la 15 grand with some extras and Aygo is about 10 .
easy to park ? i saw a damn C1 , Polo and Aygo with parking sensors , i mean shit , how fucking dumb must you be to need parking sensors on a car as big as that ??
another dumb idea is taking driving lessons and learning to park on a car with parking sensors , when that driver will try using a car without i'm almost sure she or he will fuck up.




Last edited by Hierofan on Fri, 17th Jul 2009 10:58; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group