| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 11th Sep 2009 11:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Multi-displays are bleh. Those screen edges don't just disappear you know. I would like to see that 7680 x 3200 resolution on a 40/50 inch display. But the reason that AMD didn't show it themselves is probably because it didn't look as great as it sounds on a single monitor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Sep 2009 11:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, surround display is pretty much useless. Does anyone remember the Matrox Parhelia ? Lol.
Gfx is all about gaming performance fellas, that's where the market is !
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Sep 2009 12:01 Post subject: |
|
|
And why is this important for the regular customer?
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_SiN_
Megatron
Posts: 12108
Location: Cybertron
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Sep 2009 20:00 Post subject: |
|
|
most games i play on one monitor
for most games it is unnecessary
but i can't imagine playing dirt or il2 or flying arma helicopters without my triple monitor setup
3x the view IS important for gameplay like that
unless nvidia follows this, it'll probably be the deciding factor for my next card
much like nvidia was with better drivers and better multi-display support for my current one
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slizza
Posts: 2345
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Sep 2009 20:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Why make abother thread?
Just kidding i guess you never seen i posted this yesterday.
Corsair 750D :: 750W DPS-G:: Asus x370 PRO :: R7 1800X ::16gb DDR4 :: GTX 1070::525gb SSD::Coolermaster 240MM AIO::
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 17th Sep 2009 23:40 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 17th Sep 2009 23:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Eh, as "borderless" as they are, you'll still see the borders, so still shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Sep 2009 00:16 Post subject: |
|
|
And to think a lot of people here moan about the small black bars in some games.
Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, Zotac RTX 3060 Ti, Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms GTG IPS FreeSync KVM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Sep 2009 00:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the two are unrelated in my opinion. "Black bars" on top and bottom can hardly be compared to having BLACK BARS ( ) running in the middle of your picture. Even with these "borderless", you still see the edge, and to me that's distracting.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Sep 2009 00:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Newty182 wrote: | | And to think a lot of people here moan about the small black bars in some games. |
I think I've proved, time and time again, that those "small" black bars aren't as small as the WS fagjobs point out >_> 16:9 games on a 16:10 monitor? Fine, perfectly acceptable - minuscule - borders. 16:9/16:10 games on a 4:3/5:3 monitor? Fucking HORRIFIC and end up causing 35-45% of the screen to become black void.
Meh.
I'm still with Leo on this; until there are physically NO boundaries, borders, cuts, lines or any seams in any way - then spanned-monitor gaming will always be ridiculous.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
