| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 8th Dec 2004 11:30 Post subject: AMD 64 vs Intel |
|
 |
Sorry to bother again,
But what processor is best for gaming - AMD 64 or Intel's.
thanks.
Peace.
Interinactive wrote:
Achievement unlocked: More unoptimised than a Ubishit game
No worries. The Division is just around the corner. Devil Troll
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 8th Dec 2004 11:35 Post subject: |
|
|
right now id say theyre about even, but when 64bit windows and more games have the compatibility the 64 will obvioussly win. of course it depends on what speeds your using too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[mrt]
[Admin] Code Monkey
Posts: 1338
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
razor1394
VIP Member
Posts: 3571
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2004 20:42 Post subject: |
|
|
AMD 64 is almost made for gaming. Some of the lower speed 64 bit cpus beat the highest clocked P4's.
Last edited by razor1394 on Sun, 16th Jan 2005 11:16; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 9th Dec 2004 22:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Intel is going 64 bit in 2005 so just wait till then
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonazei
Posts: 26
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Jan 2005 03:07 Post subject: No way... |
|
|
Okay Intel is going 64 bit... but they are way behind... AMD has about 80% of the marked today... 1 year ago it was the other way around... I've heard that Dell maybe switching to AMD... But let's see what happens...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Jan 2005 14:56 Post subject: Re: No way... |
|
|
| jonazei wrote: | | Okay Intel is going 64 bit... but they are way behind... AMD has about 80% of the marked today... 1 year ago it was the other way around... I've heard that Dell maybe switching to AMD... But let's see what happens... |
I don't want to start the discussion, but what are you talking about? 80% of the overoll cpu market. You must be dreaming! Not even does AMD have 80% on the retail market:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/09/amd_vs_intel_retail/
Intel still dominates the more important business and notebook market:
| Quote: | | It's important to point out that the numbers refer to desktop sales. Intel dominates the notebook sector, which is taking an ever larger chunk of the overall PC market, keeping the chip giant well ahead of its arch-rival for the time being. Equally, Intel continues to outsell AMD by a very healthy margin in the non-retail segments, primarily because of its strength in the corporate and business sectors - and, of course, market leader Dell's current 'Intel only' policy. |
I know that's an older article, but intel still dominates notebooks and the non-retail markets, and these are the ones profit is made. And dell is only thinking about to offer opteron servers in addition to xeon's
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonazei
Posts: 26
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Tue, 18th Jan 2005 12:45 Post subject: Hey... |
|
|
Sorry dude... I forgot to specify... (In Denmark)...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonazei
Posts: 26
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Tue, 18th Jan 2005 12:49 Post subject: Doesn't change the fact... |
|
|
The AMD processors are great for playing... People will see a great differens in the new games on the marked... Because the AMD processor takes a lot more data through it's "brain", the maps etc. can be a lot bigger than it used to be...
I'm lovin' It...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
| Posted: Tue, 18th Jan 2005 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
*walks away*
Listen to MRT ..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Tue, 18th Jan 2005 18:47 Post subject: |
|
|
I could have sworn AMD 64 was *the* fastest for gaming, can't even compare them...
personally I can't stand AMD though, every system I've built using their chips has had fucking problems, from games freezing when I start them to crashes and so on.... then I build an intel and ta da everything worked perfectly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonazei
Posts: 26
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Tue, 18th Jan 2005 19:23 Post subject: Pist? |
|
|
Maybe you should consider to get help, when you connect your hardware...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Panoramix
Posts: 181
Location: Essen/NRW/Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonazei
Posts: 26
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed, 2nd Feb 2005 14:21 Post subject: Nice dude... |
|
|
That's just what i mean! Thought the clockfrez.'s not very high on the AMD processors, they still kick ass
I'm lovin' it...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 3rd Feb 2005 14:25 Post subject: |
|
|
jo last year i bought an AMD64-3000+ which runs fine @2200MHz with the original-cooler which equals to a 3300+. gaming is a nice thing on the AMD, but i do not like the performance when using cce or other cpu-intensive progs, the mousefeeling is very choppy, new opened tasks will need about 20sec. to show up etc... ie my olde dual-p3-1000 box is not that fast in encoding vidstuff but the system responds much smoother than the AMD-babe. the same i recognized on a P4 with HT, you r able to do some things while running a high-priored task.
maybe the L1+L2 Cache will affect performance that way, also i believe that intel-chipsets r the best ya can get, they offer the best ram-performance.
AMD is real nice but P4HT is a bit nicer, if ya want allroundperformance.
HD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
