i dont get how people say that they were told to question their faith and seek knowledge and be skeptic and THEN take their obvious failure for a great achievement. *shakes head*
Thanks, I'll pop this in when I need background noise in less attention intensive games.
I would have loved to have Hitchens on the team, he loved to rip pro-delusion guys to shreds, like he did in the Catholic debate, teaming up with Stephen Fry. If he was on, it would have been an instant watch, now it's just "maybe later".
Well, they brought some priest and some nutcase right-winger to counter them.
They are still making more sense than - for example - Dembsky did in his debate with Hitchens. And that guy is a champion of the ID movement in the US.
Well, they brought some priest and some nutcase right-winger to counter them.
They are still making more sense than - for example - Dembsky did in his debate with Hitchens. And that guy is a champion of the ID movement in the US.
I am not familiar with debate either, but from the priest opening statement, it seems he used the same theoretic and arguments most religious people use - apply their own personal good view of their believe and their belief in their institution and tuck their head in the sand (or purposefully ignore) regarding the bad that these institutions do.
What else is there for them to do? If all the rest is made up stuff with no rational justification, all they can fall back on is their personal touchy-feely view, and strawmaning the opposition. It's just a pleasure watching those two rip them a new one.
wow, 20mins before the end. Epic bitch-fight, where the koranazi gets her knickers in a twist, because she doesnt like that somebody is turning her no-true-scotsman argument the other way around
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
