Microsoft Flight
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 02:17    Post subject: Microsoft Flight
No thread?

5 new screenshots: http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/
You need Silverlight to see them.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 02:24    Post subject:
Here they are, without silverlight Smile
 Spoiler:
 


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
akwar




Posts: 341

PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 07:39    Post subject:
Add REX,GEX and a few other goodies to FSX and it virtually looks the same.Considering flight is going to be Windows Live game I see a lot of hard core simulation fans sticking with FSX over this.A good deal of FS9 and FSX users fly on Vatsim or offline.They are not going to want to be connected to live just to play.I also wonder if Flight is going to allow freeware modding like all the former FS titles did.With the age of DLC crap,I doubt it.It has great potential but there are a lot of negative factors.If that's the case I am perfectly fine in sticking with FSX.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 08:15    Post subject:
i could imagine something like this would be cool in 3D...


Back to top
outtanames




Posts: 1591

PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 09:45    Post subject:
It's not derp enough. lol wut
Back to top
pikachupi




Posts: 4180

PostPosted: Sat, 28th May 2011 10:15    Post subject:
i prefer to fly above liberty city, at list there is ai life under and things happening and buildings don't look like boring 3d grey boxes.
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 05:02    Post subject:
pikachupi wrote:
i prefer to fly above liberty city, at list there is ai life under and things happening and buildings don't look like boring 3d grey boxes.


go for it then. Some of us would rather at least have *some* similarity to how a real aircraft behaves.
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 08:14    Post subject:
akwar wrote:
Add REX,GEX and a few other goodies to FSX and it virtually looks the same.Considering flight is going to be Windows Live game I see a lot of hard core simulation fans sticking with FSX over this.A good deal of FS9 and FSX users fly on Vatsim or offline.They are not going to want to be connected to live just to play.I also wonder if Flight is going to allow freeware modding like all the former FS titles did.With the age of DLC crap,I doubt it.It has great potential but there are a lot of negative factors.If that's the case I am perfectly fine in sticking with FSX.



Windows Live can't be any worse than that Gamespy horseshit. The gamespy FSX lobby is f'n horrible. And next to useless. It'd be nice to have a proper server browser that doesn't A) boot you out of the lobby randomly and B) with sorting and/or filtering that actually works.

As for the rest, hard to say. There has been next to zero information actually released. A few screenshots and some useless quick video clips. It would be nice if they'd release some more f'n info about the thing. I've tried email but, of course, they don't answer it - only receive it. We'll see I guess
Back to top
pikachupi




Posts: 4180

PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 11:19    Post subject:
dodger2020 wrote:
pikachupi wrote:
i prefer to fly above liberty city, at list there is ai life under and things happening and buildings don't look like boring 3d grey boxes.


go for it then. Some of us would rather at least have *some* similarity to how a real aircraft behaves.


don't get me wrong, i used to be and i am still big fun of realistic flight sims but i hate to see 2011 sim with graphic worst than 2004.

looking glass studios did great job back in the late 90's with flight unlimited titles, but unfortunately they didn't sorvive the market:( also DID for combat sims like the legendary super ef 2000.

thats my pov.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 12:34    Post subject:
If they wanted to have extremely realistic looking graphics, it would be more down to space issues than rendering capacity. IIRC x-planes did this. It had amazingly detailed landscapes, but it came at the cost of having the sim on several DVDs.

Hell, a sufficiently moded FSX takes up half of an average HDD.

Not to mention that really good graphical updates are payware that I'm quite confident Microsoft gets a nice cut out of. It's better for everyone if they stick to the basics. We won't have to spend a day swapping discs just to install the program and we can buy/pirate packs we want for ourselves.
Back to top
pikachupi




Posts: 4180

PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 15:36    Post subject:
thats why i was talking about gta 4, it's small map with alot of details and it is fun to fly around the city even with no meaning.
i prefer small but realistic map on full glob with low textures, but again, this is me.

p.s, never tested the x-plane, but now i am going to tray:)


what a days Smile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AawQvD8L_h4


Last edited by pikachupi on Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 04:35; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 22:07    Post subject:
lol @ people comparing GTA4 etc..

Flight sim = ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 22:47    Post subject:
Too bad FSX is fucked up on my GTS450 (if I put random scenery above medium the whole screen gets glitched). I might have been flying my jet from SanFran to NYC if not for that damn bug. And FSX was one of the main reasons why I bought it...should have researched it before...
Back to top
Tungsten




Posts: 2020

PostPosted: Sun, 29th May 2011 22:56    Post subject:
yes, fsx was a complete gfx,resource hog... ran shitty on even the nest computers at the time.
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Mon, 30th May 2011 03:36    Post subject:
Tungsten wrote:
yes, fsx was a complete gfx,resource hog... ran shitty on even the nest computers at the time.


It can STILL bring a modern system to it's knees if everything is cranked. I'm hoping that this new one will be much better optimized. I wonder if they'll show anything at E3. At least give some real info.

As for the guys that just want pretty graphics and compare this to GTA4.... Take On Helicopters will probably be what you're looking for. Smaller areas, higher detail. And about as "sim" as the aircraft in ARMA are. Smile
Back to top
pikachupi




Posts: 4180

PostPosted: Mon, 30th May 2011 08:32    Post subject:
@dodger2020

looking forward to this one (take on heli:)
Back to top
human_steel




Posts: 33269

PostPosted: Mon, 30th May 2011 12:11    Post subject:
Can't wait for this one.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 03:15    Post subject:
Trailer!



TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 03:25    Post subject:
Looks good, especially the realism of the effects.

At 1:03-1:05 look at the front most mountains. The textures look awful (like the water texture too) and the terrain detail is horrible too. Imagine that in another time of day setting Sad


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65078
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 03:41    Post subject:
Great atmosphere, the lighting has been improved a lot if compared to FSX, more natural and realistic (the cockpit view is quite impressive). A new PC will be required for this beauty though Razz
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 07:47    Post subject:
ixigia wrote:
Great atmosphere, the lighting has been improved a lot if compared to FSX, more natural and realistic (the cockpit view is quite impressive). A new PC will be required for this beauty though Razz


PumpAction picks apart the textures. They didn't bother me. But I hope the fonts they're using for the radios in this "webisode" are just placeholders Very Happy

I wonder with all the flying around Hawaii if that's where the default airport will be in this version.
Back to top
human_steel




Posts: 33269

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 12:07    Post subject:
Great trailer. The atmosphere is amazing. Any targeted release date?
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 12:10    Post subject:
None for the moment.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
briangw




Posts: 1752
Location: Warren, MN
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 14:53    Post subject:
Where there any community made Combat Flight Sim addons for the previous FS games after the last MS-made CFS was released?
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 02:07    Post subject:
briangw wrote:
Where there any community made Combat Flight Sim addons for the previous FS games after the last MS-made CFS was released?


Not really. There were combat aircraft designed of course. Some even had releasable external loads. But no combat that I'm aware of. And even if there was it'd be a fucked up kludge like half the addons for FSX
Back to top
H4wkeye




Posts: 4699
Location: CTU
PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 03:45    Post subject:
Will there be any commerical airplanes, like Airbus A320, Boeing 777, 737, etc. or just these fucking Cessnas >.<
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 04:32    Post subject:
H4wkeye wrote:
Will there be any commerical airplanes, like Airbus A320, Boeing 777, 737, etc. or just these fucking Cessnas >.<


Uhh, I imagine it will be like every other version of flight simulator and have a mix of aircraft and then you'll be able to add pretty much anything.

Who knows though. There hasn't really been any details released
Back to top
accel




Posts: 19

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 06:55    Post subject:
Visually it looks pretty much like FS9/FSX, with a bit of tweaking here and there. The dawn/dusk lighting is still poor,it's much better done in X-Plane and even in FlightGear(which is freeware and looks crap but the lighting Smile )
I hope the graphics wasn't their main concern though and they improved aircraft physics, weather simulation and added something like proper engine/systems damage. Or am I dreaming?
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 20:43    Post subject:
accel wrote:
Visually it looks pretty much like FS9/FSX, with a bit of tweaking here and there. The dawn/dusk lighting is still poor,it's much better done in X-Plane and even in FlightGear(which is freeware and looks crap but the lighting Smile )
I hope the graphics wasn't their main concern though and they improved aircraft physics, weather simulation and added something like proper engine/systems damage. Or am I dreaming?


Dreaming? Probably. We'll see though.

All I want out of it is proper helicopter simulation. And ATC that can properly handle IFR procedures.

Now THAT'S wishful thinking Smile
Back to top
Leftos




Posts: 1159
Location: Patras, Greece
PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Jun 2011 21:58    Post subject:
Why are we discussing this game so soon? I mean, even if it gets released tomorrow, it'll be 3-4 years before we can properly enjoy it, after having enough money to spend on upgrades.


[ i5 2500K (@4.2GHz) / GIGABYTE Z77MX-D3H / 8GB Corsair XMS / GIGABYTE GTX460 1GB OC / 640+750 GB WD Caviar Black ]
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group