| Page 1 of 10 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 10:53 Post subject: Sacred 3 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 11:15 Post subject: Re: Sacred 3 |
|
|
| blackdochia wrote: | http://www.strategyinformer.com/news/19594/dead-island-riptide-sacred-3-and-sacred-citadel-debuting-at-pax-prime
Well, there are three titles in the announcement, but we are really interested in Sacred 3, right?! |
Bloody right we are!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 11:42 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BLaM!
VIP Member
Posts: 13818
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 11:55 Post subject: |
|
|
great news ! 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VonMisk
Posts: 9435
Location: Hatredland
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 12:50 Post subject: |
|
|
I hope it will be better than the borefest the second one was.
sar·casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 13:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Still like the first one more than the second (i mean where are my favorites; the battlemage, the archer, the vampiress and the dark elf)....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 15:55 Post subject: |
|
|
Amazing! I was just thinking about Sacred 1 and 2 yesterday! I never completed either game but they were both fascinating in their own ways.
1 and 2 are still amazing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 16:59 Post subject: |
|
|
The thing that really REALLY pissed me off in Sacred 2 was the whatever you call it, path finding? Anyway, whatever the chuff it is called it was damn annoying not being able to take shortcuts or climb over anything higher than a grasshoppers knee.
Having to travel for miles just to get round a tree or rock etc.
But overall its a great game, but as mentioned a bit boring and samey at times.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 17:09 Post subject: |
|
|
What they need to do with 3 is make it smaller, but more focused. That's why I never finished any of the Sacred games. I liked them both pretty much the same, but it was just too much. They're too much like Bethesda's games. Developers need to listen to Swen from Larian.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65005
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun, 26th Aug 2012 18:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Nice, let's hope they manage to fix the few problems that the original had, making everything even more entertaining (possibly without any nextgen features, but I'm quite confident that it will be old-school). 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:38 Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/29/sacred-3-hack-and-slash-co-op-whether-you-like-it-or-not
Forced co-op, whether with human allies or AI characters. I can deal with the PS3 being the lead platform, the shift from clicky-clicky-clicky to bash-bash-bash, Sacred was always an aRPG at heart and it was obvious which control method was intended for Sacred 2 -- so I can deal with that, I have no qualms, but force co-op?? No thanks, count me out 
| Quote: |
Sacred was always better in co-op, so Sacred 3 leaves it on at all times. Even if you're not connected to three online pals, you'll have a trio of A.I. allies rolling with you as you fight off large groups of bad guys. And no, before you ask, you do not have to be connected to the Internet at all times to play.
|
The fuck it was.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65005
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:46 Post subject: |
|
|
The hell? It couldn't sound worse.. 
forced co-op
PlayStation 3 is its lead platform
this is an RPG engineered to appeal to a console audience
combat is more action-oriented
We never asked for this. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:47 Post subject: |
|
|
I was actually looking forward to the game.. It's gonna be another fucking Dung3on Si3g3. Regardless of how mediocre or acceptably average the game is, it's not gonna be a Sacred game.
| Quote: | | Sacred 3 looks to do what its predecessors couldn't: put itself on par with the modern standard of its genre. |
And what the fuck is that about?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:49 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | Ah well, remember guys; You can't spell IGNORANT without IGN  |
You can't spell ignorant without RANT either  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 20:58 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 21:29 Post subject: |
|
|
So it's going to be like "Dungeon Siege" 3? If so, they can fuck themselves. I don't want that. If it's just the default style of the game and it has the great amount of options like 2, it might be ok. I'd like to see it in motion to get an idea of how the game is going to be played, but this seems like it might be yet another raped franchise. Also, isn't this made by some other developer, so it wasn't a good idea to have faith in this from the start?! And before I forget, that first screenshot looks absolutely horrible.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 21:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Have more faith in Sacred Citadel than the third one now
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
barash
Posts: 832
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BLaM!
VIP Member
Posts: 13818
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Aug 2012 22:36 Post subject: |
|
|
oh well..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34736
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 31st Aug 2012 19:45 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
| Posted: Sun, 2nd Sep 2012 22:14 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 2nd Sep 2012 22:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| DarkRohirrim wrote: | | So it's going to be like "Dungeon Siege" 3? If so, they can fuck themselves. I don't want that. If it's just the default style of the game and it has the great amount of options like 2, it might be ok. I'd like to see it in motion to get an idea of how the game is going to be played, but this seems like it might be yet another raped franchise. Also, isn't this made by some other developer, so it wasn't a good idea to have faith in this from the start?! And before I forget, that first screenshot looks absolutely horrible. |
I couldn't get into dungon siege 3 at all. The horrible controls on PC really put me off.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 2nd Sep 2012 23:54 Post subject: |
|
|
sigh. I hated that piece of crap - DS3- which had nothing to do with dungeon siege 1 & 2.. and now that..
2 of my favorite series are now dead .. QQ
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Mon, 3rd Sep 2012 07:45 Post subject: |
|
|
sacred 1 was medium-good at best. Sacred 2 was mediocre. Third one was destined to be garbage.
Last edited by Sin317 on Wed, 21st Nov 2012 12:39; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 11:06 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24555
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 13:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| blackdochia wrote: | http://gamebanshee.com/games/sacred-3.html?tab=images
Some new screenies |
Looks like a Diablo 3-clone to me. I get strong D3-vibes. I guess the developer/publisher thought Blizzard would make another mega-hit with D3 and decided to copy the concept and work on their own D3-game but using a name they already owned.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 13:38 Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, looks more like Diablo 3 than Sacred.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 13:56 Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't liked any of the Sacred games so far, though the first one had real potential. The second was huge and hollow - and their combo system is a complete mess. Their items are dull - and combat is clumsy.
Hmm...
I'll check it out, though.
As for looking like D3? Well, on those screenshots - sure. But then again, it's the same genre. I think D3 looks great (the gameplay is the problem) - so I don't mind.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 10 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
