| Page 1 of 3 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 19:12 Post subject: |
|
|
they can both turn at the same time since they dont have to make the turn so squareish. One of them can just give way with hand signs or a headlight blink. this applies to all cases I think.
i5-3570k @4.4gHz, MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4g OC'd, MSI z77a-g45, Corsair Vengeance 8gb 1600mHz, Corsair TX650 PSU, Crucial M4 128gb, WD 1.5 TB HDD, Seagate 1TB HDD, LG 27MB85R-B 1440p
RSI name: ctulu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 19:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| kazemaky wrote: | | they can both turn at the same time since they dont have to make the turn so squareish. One of them can just give way with hand signs or a headlight blink. this applies to all cases I think. |
This.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
As kazemaky said, both at same time. Just "cut" the corner.
If one of them has to wait, let car 2 (stop sign) wait. Stop means you only drive if it's clear. "Give Way" gives you a tiny bit more power.
I hate you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 20:15 Post subject: |
|
|
car 1 has right of way if car two has a stop sign as well as giveway.. 
you stop to a halt ( stop ) first and giveway,
giveway only sign you approach to almost a stop if no traffic seen and carry on if clear.
If that is not the case your post is not accurate in its description of sign info.
p.s you are car two and fucked up?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 22:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| kazemaky wrote: | | they can both turn at the same time since they dont have to make the turn so squareish. One of them can just give way with hand signs or a headlight blink. this applies to all cases I think. |
This, unless they are lightcycles from Tron.
| chiv wrote: | | don't quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 23:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| kazemaky wrote: | | they can both turn at the same time since they dont have to make the turn so squareish. One of them can just give way with hand signs or a headlight blink. this applies to all cases I think. |
This. Happens all the time here as we got so many intersections like that in our little town.
Don't need for extra signals or anything, it's common sense that you can both turn at the same time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 1st Dec 2013 23:58 Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I know, whoever reaches the intersection and comes to a stop first has the right of way, whether it's crossing over the intersection or turning across traffic (ie, in this example; left) If you both reach at the same time, such as in the example, the driver on the LEFT has right of way (or right if you're in a left-hand-drive country)
~edit~
This is Canada but should still apply to US;
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/driver/handbook/section2.4.3.shtml
| Quote: | At an intersection without signs or lights, you must yield the right-of-way to a vehicle approaching the intersection before you, and if you arrive at the same time, the vehicle approaching from the right has the right-of-way (Diagram 2-1 .
an uncontrolled intersection
Diagram 2-18
At an intersection with stop signs at all corners, you must yield the right-of-way to the first vehicle to come to a complete stop. If two vehicles stop at the same time, the vehicle on the left must yield to the vehicle on the right (Diagram 2-19). |
Last edited by sabin1981 on Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 00:03; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morphineus
VIP Member
Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 00:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | As far as I know, whoever reaches the intersection and comes to a stop first has the right of way, whether it's crossing over the intersection or turning across traffic (ie, in this example; left) If you both reach at the same time, such as in the example, the driver on the LEFT has right of way (or right if you're in a left-hand-drive country)
|
This is the only right answer 
*Edit* Same in Belgium (and willing to bet in most countries) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 10:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | As far as I know, whoever reaches the intersection and comes to a stop first has the right of way, whether it's crossing over the intersection or turning across traffic (ie, in this example; left) If you both reach at the same time, such as in the example, the driver on the LEFT has right of way (or right if you're in a left-hand-drive country)
~edit~
This is Canada but should still apply to US;
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/driver/handbook/section2.4.3.shtml
| Quote: | At an intersection without signs or lights, you must yield the right-of-way to a vehicle approaching the intersection before you, and if you arrive at the same time, the vehicle approaching from the right has the right-of-way (Diagram 2-1.
an uncontrolled intersection
Diagram 2-18
At an intersection with stop signs at all corners, you must yield the right-of-way to the first vehicle to come to a complete stop. If two vehicles stop at the same time, the vehicle on the left must yield to the vehicle on the right (Diagram 2-19). |
|
Aren't there special rules for "STOP" signs? At least we have them in Germany. A stop sign means all wheels have to come to a stop, then you are allowed to drive on. While the give way sign just means, you have to give way, but don't have to stop the car.
But anyway:
If you have this case while doing your drivers licence, just give the other car a sign to drive first, even if you are there in the first place and/or both cars could drive at the same time. This won't give you any trouble.
After this theory shit you have to follow, people just drive at the same time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 10:46 Post subject: |
|
|
You gesture using hand signals to give right of way of no other signs and rules can be used to determine it. That's what I was taught at least.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24636
Location: Your Mom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RatKing
Posts: 1212
Location: Nondescript cave in the land of the polar bears, Finland
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 12:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| BearishSun wrote: | | You gesture using hand signals |
The specific international standard, only one finger required. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24636
Location: Your Mom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 12:33 Post subject: |
|
|
The cars don't have to cross paths, and in the real world it would seem obvious.
Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 11422
Location: Florida, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 18:42 Post subject: |
|
|
From what I recall, in theory, when you execute a turn on the crossroads you need to stay in your lane (or an assumed continuation of it), cutting corners would assume straying into the opposing or parallel lane, which you shouldn't do.
It's still not quite like pictured - it's more of an arc, but you would still cross paths when driving that way.
No one drives like that in reality, but as a theoretical problem on rules of the road it's valid.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 20:29 Post subject: |
|
|
also it depends on the width and the exact build of the road if the cars can turn simultaneously. Obviously cant do it with no room.
i5-3570k @4.4gHz, MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4g OC'd, MSI z77a-g45, Corsair Vengeance 8gb 1600mHz, Corsair TX650 PSU, Crucial M4 128gb, WD 1.5 TB HDD, Seagate 1TB HDD, LG 27MB85R-B 1440p
RSI name: ctulu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dkkev
OptimusPrime
Posts: 437
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 08:42 Post subject: |
|
|
lol only a western european would actually give a fuck who goes first, if this was in russia or anywhere else in the world this wouldn't be a problem at all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 09:50 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 11:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: |
Wouldn't the blue car pass first, then yellow, then green?
|
No.
| Quote: | | Yellow can't go first, because when he's turning the right side of the car would be in the blue car's way. |
It doesn't matter here. The driver who has no car on his right side is going first.
yellow - green - blue is correct.
Last edited by LittleBigProblem on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 11:07; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 11:06 Post subject: |
|
|
How is it correct? When I leave my fiancees house I'm at the exact same situation, I would be the green car and I would be turning left.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 11:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Unless I'm missing something there is no way yellow goes first. When you turn left you have to wait until a car that goes straight passes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
