I haven't played either of them. Which one should I play...?
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
Dat poll It looks like I'm downloading the wrong game then Thanks guys.
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
Dat poll It looks like I'm downloading the wrong game then Thanks guys.
Get both, W_D is still a very good game and the graphics "mods" released since launch have done a good job at restoring some of the fuckery Ubisoft did to it, bringing back a lot of the E3-style visuals. It's a fun game with a decent hacking mechanic and worth playing.
They're pretty close to each other, I'd say it's mostly up to personal preference which is better. They both have flaws. I enjoyed WD more as I preferred its setting, and the open world just felt better in WD, but if I remember correctly SD story was better.
SD has a smaller download size (~half of WD's) and combined with the results of the poll it wins for now.
It goes without saying I will try both of them at some point, but I'll go with SD first.
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
It's the story and setting in SD that sold it for me... glorious stuff. I actually connected and felt for the characters in SD, they were done far more expertly and believable than in WD, where I didn't really care for any of them :\ Aiden was an unlikeable dick and I don't even remember the names of anyone else, heh, whereas in SD.. I still feel raw over some of those characters.
Last edited by sabin1981 on Tue, 28th Apr 2015 15:15; edited 1 time in total
See, I actually had *zero* trouble with the driving in SD. I know a lot of people felt they were too arcadey and that the driving was terrible, but I had a blast with it.. so I'm kind of biased in that regard
Watch dogs for me. Sleeping dogs was ok, but its very plastic in everything outside the story missions, while watchdogs has a nice open world, a good driving model, and very enjoyable combat and side missions.
Watch dogs for me. Sleeping dogs was ok, but its very plastic in everything outside the story missions, while watchdogs has a nice open world, a good driving model, and very enjoyable combat and side missions.
*takes notes*
boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Watch dogs for me. Sleeping dogs was ok, but its very plastic in everything outside the story missions, while watchdogs has a nice open world, a good driving model, and very enjoyable combat and side missions.
*takes notes*
Yeah, I always felt left out for not being part of the universally praised, sleeping dogs hump collective, but I just can't lie about it, it was just an average game with a crappy driving model and an empty open world for me.
Yeah, I always felt left out for not being part of the universally praised, sleeping dogs hump collective, but I just can't lie about it, it was just an average game with a crappy driving model and an empty open world for me.
Be that as it may, but every flaw SD has, W_D has too...amplified by 1000
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
It looks like I'm downloading the wrong game then 
Thanks guys. 
)
