NO way that is in game graphics. this looks too incredible.
its just a cg cutscene
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
NO way that is in game graphics. this looks too incredible.
its just a cg cutscene
nop did you see the ingame cutscenes for all them ND games?
it looks CG and feels CG but it's in game for the most part
when they control everything it looks nice. but after that... GAY.
same with MGS... it looks damn nice in cutscenes and then you play it and you see.... YOU SEEEE!!!
never liked any of the UCs. will prolly buy ps4 in 2015/16 after all the big hitters come. right now... only one game was on sonys floor and ill prolly buy a vita for manny.
NO way that is in game graphics. this looks too incredible.
its just a cg cutscene
nop did you see the ingame cutscenes for all them ND games?
it looks CG and feels CG but it's in game for the most part
when they control everything it looks nice. but after that... GAY.
same with MGS... it looks damn nice in cutscenes and then you play it and you see.... YOU SEEEE!!!
never liked any of the UCs. will prolly buy ps4 in 2015/16 after all the big hitters come. right now... only one game was on sonys floor and ill prolly buy a vita for manny.
All cutscenes have been pre-rendered in ND games. Even the TLOU remake has them prerendered :
Quote:
"Our cinematics are now running at 1080p and 60fps, and that involved rendering them all from scratch. It's interesting that now [instead of a technical bottleneck], the bottleneck is "Can we fit all this on the disc?"
It's "in-engine" "captured" "rendered" etc, never mentioned anything about real time, because it's not.
Yes it will look good, but nowhere near this quality.
I will get PS4 just for this game, absolutely loved Uncharted 2&3. Naughty Dog can do absolutely amazing things with PS3, cant wait to see how it really looks.
NO way that is in game graphics. this looks too incredible.
its just a cg cutscene
nop did you see the ingame cutscenes for all them ND games?
it looks CG and feels CG but it's in game for the most part
when they control everything it looks nice. but after that... GAY.
same with MGS... it looks damn nice in cutscenes and then you play it and you see.... YOU SEEEE!!!
never liked any of the UCs. will prolly buy ps4 in 2015/16 after all the big hitters come. right now... only one game was on sonys floor and ill prolly buy a vita for manny.
well most (if not all) cutscenes in uc2 and 3 are prerendered... and plenty of people judge game graphics by them because they dont know those are recorded.
it will surely look great but not cg
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
I started Uncharted 1 and enjoyed parts of it, but I got stuck and frustrated and CBA to continue past about half way.
I'd like to "catch up" ahead of this being released. Am I safe / sensible in just jumping into Uncharted 2, or would it really be silly to skip the second half of Uncharted 1?
FYI, I loved Tomb Raider so I know this genre will be enjoyable...
Yeah You are good. UC1 is crap shooter really.
UC2 too... but it had its moments and characters (too much shooting tho)
my fav one was uc3 but I am a weird one here. most people say its worst one
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Yeah You are good. UC1 is crap shooter really.
UC2 too... but it had its moments and characters (too much shooting tho)
my fav one was uc3 but I am a weird one here. most people say its worst one
def weird, especially calling uc2 crap, my jaw was open the whole time playing it, still the best graphics on ps3 imo, and shooting was smooth and fun, also very fun to beat on the higher difficulties
For me it felt like It tried to do the same thing as gears of war + platformer set pieces.
Shooting, shooting, shooting. Over 1k killed enemies in first game, 1k enemies in second game and 500 in third game. Those are statistics. 3rd game was most "exploration" based of three and that's why I liked it the most.
UC games are totally shooters. Corridor after corridor of shooting. Constantly. It was very tiresome to me. Thankfully characters and settings were very entertaining... in not a bit too much. Nate felt like trying too hard.
And as for being a shooter, I hated the feel of shooting iteslf. The difficulty was also terribly balanced in second part of 1st and second game. They ramped up enemies hp and damage like crazy.
Gow at least was honest about being a shooter and did it excellen + had better story and characters. Same with Binary Domain.
But again. I played all 3 UC games only couple of months ago. Years after I've finished gow trilogy couple of times and Binary Domain 3 times (for example)
Proboably just got tired of the schema becaues I've also barely finished kz2 and could not bare kz3 even tho it was done way better
edit: imo imo imo
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
For me it felt like It tried to do the same thing as gears of war + platformer set pieces.
Shooting, shooting, shooting. Over 1k killed enemies in first game, 1k enemies in second game and 500 in third game. Those are statistics. 3rd game was most "exploration" based of three and that's why I liked it the most.
UC games are totally shooters. Corridor after corridor of shooting. Constantly. It was very tiresome to me. Thankfully characters and settings were very entertaining... in not a bit too much. Nate felt like trying too hard.
And as for being a shooter, I hated the feel of shooting iteslf. The difficulty was also terribly balanced in second part of 1st and second game. They ramped up enemies hp and damage like crazy.
Gow at least was honest about being a shooter and did it excellen + had better story and characters. Same with Binary Domain.
But again. I played all 3 UC games only couple of months ago. Years after I've finished gow trilogy couple of times and Binary Domain 3 times (for example)
Proboably just got tired of the schema becaues I've also barely finished kz2 and could not bare kz3 even tho it was done way better
I agree that Gears is a much better 'cover based third person shooter' than UC (especially Gears 2 and 3), but on the story side...
FUCK
NO!
The story/characters/VO/presentation is where UC shines, there is no way in hell Gears is even half as good on ANY of those aspects!
Crocker youz crazy!
BD is probably somewhere in between, gameplay was great, story was great, it looked great (especially the way robots/metal plating break), VO was fine and some characters were well made. Hmm... I'd say fuck both Gears and UC, give me another BD!
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
did you see the ingame cutscenes for all them ND games?
