| Page 7 of 51 |
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 22:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arN3x
Posts: 182
Location: Lithuania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 22:27 Post subject: |
|
|
@ aeonfast: rename with .exe at the end.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 22:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Why is the fixed benchmark alot harder, dont know how to say it good.
At the first benchmark i have 65 frames average, evertyhing maxed out. At the second benchmark i have 34 frames average. Why is the second one lower?
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 22:53 Post subject: |
|
|
who cares about the pc version?
the console version is out since march, and the game itself is nothing special.
for me the worst resi in the series..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arN3x
Posts: 182
Location: Lithuania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 22:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| aeonfast wrote: | Why is the fixed benchmark alot harder, dont know how to say it good.
At the first benchmark i have 65 frames average, evertyhing maxed out. At the second benchmark i have 34 frames average. Why is the second one lower? |
Fixed benchmark has a ton of zombies to stress the computer, gameplay benchmark shows what FPS you actually get when playing. I though it's pretty obvious.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| streetunder wrote: | who cares about the pc version?
the console version is out since march, and the game itself is nothing special.
for me the worst resi in the series.. |
Well in my opinion is the second best (only because RE4 was a blast!).
Really nice game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:08 Post subject: |
|
|
I think Coop wil be awesome. All those zombie's around you, terrafying. I like !
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:15 Post subject: |
|
|
BTW I remember people were mocking at me when I was saying how good actually Capcom ported SF4, saying it was a simple game with nothing to display, and there was nothing to be impressed about on medium rigs...
Now that Capcom has ported RE5 and it runs beautifully on medium rigs (8800 GT + C2D) what are people gonna say ? That RE5 is displaying simple scenes ? Hopefully now people notice that Capcom knows how to program.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:21 Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that the last couple ports Capcom did were quite good, but all the hatred is understandable, since RE4 and manily DMC3 were total shitty ports.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| anti-flag wrote: | | since RE4 and manily DMC3 were total shitty ports. |
I think neither were done by Capcom, but outsourced to third-party developers. These are first-party ports.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65073
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:42 Post subject: |
|
|
benchmark runs good got 67fps average on c2d6600 vista64 dx10 8800gt 1280x1024.. def gonna buy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 16th Jul 2009 23:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| skinlab100 wrote: | | benchmark runs good got 67fps average on c2d6600 vista64 dx10 8800gt 1280x1024.. def gonna buy. |
LOL you got the same framerate as mine, but i have C2D E6750 and a GTX275..probably a limit?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:08 Post subject: |
|
|
So this is not a bad port of console versions I hope.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 00:50 Post subject: |
|
|
update get 68fps , anti and motion blur are turned off.... using 185.85 drivers.. this is on variable benchmark
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slizza
Posts: 2345
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 01:00 Post subject: |
|
|
76fps average in both tests dx10 max settings, VISTA X64 - 1440 x 900
Another good job porting by Capcom.
Corsair 750D :: 750W DPS-G:: Asus x370 PRO :: R7 1800X ::16gb DDR4 :: GTX 1070::525gb SSD::Coolermaster 240MM AIO::
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashok0
Posts: 1733
Location: Ohio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 02:19 Post subject: |
|
|
well after DMC4 i would be surprised if this run like shit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 03:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | | well after DMC4 i would be surprised if this run like shit |
Aye DMC 4 ran fast like nuts on DX 10.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 06:36 Post subject: |
|
|
To anyone lucky enough to have an nVidia 3D Vision setup, there is a special 3D version of the benchmark out on nZone:
http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_re5_downloads.html
Correcting people since 2007 even if they're not wrong.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 07:03 Post subject: |
|
|
niiiice!
got average 64 fps on c2d6750, gtx275 (well, maybe i need to upgrade my processor at last =) )
DX9, 1680x1050, AA 8XCQ (what a hell these letters means?)
forceware 186.xx (i forgot)
Last edited by KainXVIII on Fri, 17th Jul 2009 07:40; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 08:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm I've found info on one of PL gameing websites, that 5th part will have "enchanced keyboard and mouse" steering.... right...i bet it will suck, and playing w/o pad will be sensless..
@metatron83 - I am not too much console gamer, but I haven't found game that runs as smooth as on console for years. PC editions runs faster in terms of max fps, but it is not that kind of smoothnes which makes u sick.
harballaz wrote:
Hey dont be so hard the little console eunuchs, they need time to aim their lil vibratin thumbstick.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34968
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 17th Jul 2009 08:21 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get that effect even with the first scenes going up to 150 FPS, perhaps it's something else?
(For the X2 CPU's AMD has a dual-core "optimizer" program, fixes some issues similar to what you've described.)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 7 of 51 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
The framerate is stable at 24 while in scenes 1 and 2 it was always over 60...
