| Page 10 of 214 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 12:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
| dezztroy wrote: |
You do realize that Crysis (or atleast Warhead) is extremely well optimized. |
Crysis is very good game, no doubt.
But optimised? Absolutely no. In time when game coming out, Crysis was probably one of most unoptimised games EVER. Warhead made situation better, but far from perfect.
On other side, id Software always have powerfull, but in same time brilliantly optimised engines.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 12:11 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 13:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 13:35 Post subject: |
|
|
8X AA is insane anyway, never had the need to use more than 4X
it's only for enthusiastic fat fucks with OCD cases
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 14:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| FireMaster wrote: | 8X AA is insane anyway, never had the need to use more than 4X
it's only for enthusiastic fat fucks with OCD cases |
Thats pretty accurate lol,, I mean most cards tend to run with higher samples with low AA anyhow, Im on 4X AA edge detect for all my games.. The filter ups the sampling alot, but there is no real need for more than 4x these days unless you really do have a shitty monitor.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 15:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| swebarb wrote: | | Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so.. |
doesn't mean it's not optimized, the engine can was made to scale passed what tech was out at that moment not to mention no other engine has yet to look as good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 15:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Looking at the screens there is something mhee... feels like a 2d background blended on the 3d. maybe thats the way the engine deals with further away objects, anyway hope it looks better in motion an wont affect field of vision
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 15:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| SpykeZ wrote: | | swebarb wrote: | | Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so.. |
doesn't mean it's not optimized, the engine can was made to scale passed what tech was out at that moment not to mention no other engine has yet to look as good. |
How many years have passed and there's still no hardware out there that can run it properly. Let's face it the game was as good as a graphics experiment goes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 16:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| Predator_Soul wrote: | | SpykeZ wrote: | | swebarb wrote: | | Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so.. |
doesn't mean it's not optimized, the engine can was made to scale passed what tech was out at that moment not to mention no other engine has yet to look as good. |
How many years have passed and there's still no hardware out there that can run it properly. Let's face it the game was as good as a graphics experiment goes. |
what is your definityon of properly?i remmember i played the first Crysis at..1240X1024 with high and it runned smooth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 16:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 16:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| Predator_Soul wrote: | | SpykeZ wrote: | | swebarb wrote: | | Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so.. |
doesn't mean it's not optimized, the engine can was made to scale passed what tech was out at that moment not to mention no other engine has yet to look as good. |
How many years have passed and there's still no hardware out there that can run it properly. Let's face it the game was as good as a graphics experiment goes. |
came out at the end of 2007, so maybe about a year and a half maybe? almost 2
how many card gens have their been, I think at that time the 8800GT was right up there with the 8800 Ultra (leo will correct me)
what came next? the piddly 9 series that was bullshit? can't even cound that shit, now the new 200GTX models. So really, nothing's happened much
Im all for believe it was a tech demo but still, there isn't an engine out there that can outdo it's pixel party
and if you say the UE3....ill pulverize you with a frozen trout! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 16:54 Post subject: |
|
|
what was wrong with the 9xxx series ?
i run 2 9600GT (MSI OCed version 512mb) in SLi and i can play all my games on 1680x1050 in highest with 2-4x AA with good fps ...
and they cost like nothing lol (like 100$ each)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 17:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | what was wrong with the 9xxx series ?
i run 2 9600GT (MSI OCed version 512mb) in SLi and i can play all my games on 1680x1050 in highest with 2-4x AA with good fps ...
and they cost like nothing lol (like 100$ each) |
they were a bullshit release that didn't offer anything better. The 8800 GT was almost top of the line with the 8 series, and normally when you go to a new generation, your cards are supposed to be by all means a heck of a lot better, the 9800 Gt should have seen quite the performance gain over the 8800 GT, but instead, it's exactly the same card, they just based the whole 9 series off the chip the 8800GT was made out of, all they should have done was just remake the 8 series but that would have been a very bad marketing move.
9 series was completely useless in terms of a new gen of cards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:14 Post subject: |
|
|
SpykeZ speaks the truth about Crysis. Just cause there's not really hardware today to hande it at the absolute max, doesn't mean it's not optimized.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | SpykeZ speaks the truth about Crysis. Just cause there's not really hardware today to hande it at the absolute max, doesn't mean it's not optimized. |
op·ti·mize
tr.v. op·ti·mized, op·ti·miz·ing, op·ti·miz·es
1. To make as perfect or effective as possible.
2. Computer Science To increase the computing speed and efficiency of (a program), as by rewriting instructions.
3. To make the most of.
(Source: www.thefreedictionary.com)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:30 Post subject: |
|
|
What the fuck you want? I know what optimize means.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | What the fuck you want? I know what optimize means. |
No, you don't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Then please, enlighten me as to where I made it obvious that I don't know what it means.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 18:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | Then please, enlighten me as to where I made it obvious that I don't know what it means. |
When you wrote this one:
"Just cause there's not really hardware today to hande it at the absolute max, doesn't mean it's not optimized."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 20:31 Post subject: |
|
|
lol, by you guy's definition of optimization, GTA4 was also great optimized 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 20:39 Post subject: |
|
|
Following that logic, it appears every game is optimized no matter how graphically intensive and bad-coded it is. Yep, it will be optimized/run for/by the future hardware with no care but not for/by the current one. That's why such logic is wrong. Optimization is only done in mind for the nowadays machines available. Future is just future...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 20:52 Post subject: |
|
|
NONONON
This also wrong
| Quote: | | Can u run it maxed for example 8X AA on 1600x res and up and get over 40fps ? i dont think so.. |
You cant expect to max AA, AF, AO in every game and call it unoptimized if it doesnt run anymore.. some settings are indeed intended for the future.
So you see.. the truth will always be somewhere in the middle^^
ASUS TUF B550M-PLUS | RYZEN 5600x | RTX 3060TI | 16GB DDR4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 21:11 Post subject: |
|
|
so why dont i pay for the game in the future ?? NOO they want my money now of course .
this future bullshit is bullshit.there are no settings for the future.there's only bad coding.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 21:25 Post subject: |
|
|
If Crysis is so shitty coded, then why could I play is just fine on a 5 year old computer that barely handled HL2 on high?
Can anyone here mention a single game that looks better than Crysis ( And I don't mean personal opinions, but technically looks better )?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 21:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | If Crysis is so shitty coded, then why could I play is just fine on a 5 year old computer that barely handled HL2 on high? |
I lol'd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 10 of 214 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
tbh.
