| Page 191 of 302 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 00:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
I tried that widescreen thingy, and on my system it looks the other way round, enabling the widescreen fixer just made the image stretched out. To be sure I uninstalled it and ran the game again and it looked all back in aspect ratio again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 00:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Why nobody is asking about real Multiplayer Crack? Forums are dead, all the hungry gamers playing Co-Op now. We got the console, but still can't play MP. We need to keep spaming post like:
| Quote: | | "Did teknogods say they will do competitive multiplayer?" |
or | Quote: | | "so guys teknogods working at MP or no? or only spec op will be cracks? sry 4 my english" |
or | Quote: | | "ye, freezes my too, but keep up the good work !!! i love this...fuck those bastards !!!" |
We need to keep the rush, or everybody will calm down and we never gonna see the working MP FIX.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
somehow i hope you get banned
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guyver
Posts: 2221
Location: Bunga-Bun... err Italy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 02:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Cmon what's keeping the LAN fix ? (How long did it take back in the day for the CoD5 lan fixes to show up ? (don't care about online mp, i bought the game legit so can play that already, i just want lan on 7 pc's without buying it x7)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 03:33 Post subject: |
|
|
So much talk from IW that IWnet is going to make games more balanced, and yet it is total bs.
I mean cmon, it doesnt even balance the teams. How fun is it to get your ass kicked when you play 4 vs 7, and that happened many times where we were down on people by at least 2. All you do want is to quit but you'll be punished by not receiving earned xp.
And why doesnt it shuffle people after each game. I stayed in one lobby and every single time same people went on the same teams. and it so happened to be that the team I was on were low leveled people, and we were absolutely destroyed by the other team every single time. I thought it was supposed to pair you up with people about your own level, but no such luck. Every game there are people that are just starting, and then there are those crazy people with level 60 and beyond.
But I actually like that it doesnt matter what level you are, and it pairs you up with people of different level. What I do mind is that it doesnt balance the teams when somebody quits. Is it really that complicated just to shift one person from one team to another. Fuck, it could even be the suckiest person on their team, its just I wont have to worry about him shooting at me.
Game is great, but seriously fuck iwNET.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 03:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | | But I actually like that it doesnt matter what level you are, and it pairs you up with people of different level. What I do mind is that it doesnt balance the teams when somebody quits. Is it really that complicated just to shift one person from one team to another. |
Both CoD4 and CoD5 had that feature, auto-balancing teams when needed. o.O
And those two games didn't use the wonders of IWNet.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 03:49 Post subject: |
|
|
$
seeing as it is from 3 days ago and judging by the reactions, it doesn't looks like it did improved anything, did it ? ^^
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wahad
Posts: 406
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 03:49 Post subject: |
|
|
improved my ass... i was playing all night and nothing, again unbalanced teams... 4:8 games and high skilled/ranked vs low... wtf... either its boring as hell coz u'r killing all thats moving around, or u just cant survive 3 second top....
Desktop: Athlon BE7750+ @ 3.01, 2gb, 4850 512mb gddr3, 120gb+500gb WD
Toshiba Satellite L500-126 - T6500 - 4GB of ram - 4650 1gb gddr3 - 320GB HDD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 03:52 Post subject: |
|
|
LOL @ iw
anyway, it seems a MP crack is around.
connects to steam, u can play for 1 min or so then it disconnects.
"a fix is on the way".
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wahad
Posts: 406
Location: Lebanon
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 04:06 Post subject: |
|
|
it doesnt move me... its just a question of time when i will get bored with this... knifing other players isnt long term fun
Desktop: Athlon BE7750+ @ 3.01, 2gb, 4850 512mb gddr3, 120gb+500gb WD
Toshiba Satellite L500-126 - T6500 - 4GB of ram - 4650 1gb gddr3 - 320GB HDD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wahad
Posts: 406
Location: Lebanon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 04:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | | Some servers balance teams not just by player count, but also skill. |
COD5 does. With mixed success, but sometimes it can get it perfect.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tarek
Posts: 169
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 08:03 Post subject: |
|
|
IWnet is soooo goooood.
19:00 in the evening, saturday.. 18k players on IWnet MW2 in europe(sweden)... common!
 Spoiler: | |
Only way to find a game is to go to Mosh pit. Other modes = cant find players.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
proddan
Posts: 1066
Location: Gulf of Aden
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 08:46 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 08:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tarek wrote: | IWnet is soooo goooood.
19:00 in the evening, saturday.. 18k players on IWnet MW2 in europe(sweden)... common!
| Spoiler: | |
Only way to find a game is to go to Mosh pit. Other modes = cant find players. |
In game player number is incorrect. Here are real stats http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
I'm always able to find games in seconds, even at odd hours. Is your NAT Status: Open ? That's important, if it's strict might explain why you have hard time finding games.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tarek
Posts: 169
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| Glottis wrote: |
In game player number is incorrect. Here are real stats http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
I'm always able to find games in seconds, even at odd hours. Is your NAT Status: Open ? That's important, if it's strict might explain why you have hard time finding games. |
Ye mate, Nat is open. first 3 days of MW2 i could find games everywhere in seconds. Now? only on Mosh pit. Dont know what happened, but its a big diffrence for me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:10 Post subject: |
|
|
LOL!
Best part -> All IW ranked 
Hahahaha... sorry to sound like a little kid but IWnet got pretty much pwnd here :/ A big fu to the face of all serious gamers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tarek wrote: | | Glottis wrote: |
In game player number is incorrect. Here are real stats http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
I'm always able to find games in seconds, even at odd hours. Is your NAT Status: Open ? That's important, if it's strict might explain why you have hard time finding games. |
Ye mate, Nat is open. first 3 days of MW2 i could find games everywhere in seconds. Now? only on Mosh pit. Dont know what happened, but its a big diffrence for me. |
After the update they changed IWnet behavior a bit, it now takes about 5-20 seconds to find a game, but that's because matchmaking does better test of your and other players connections. I haven't had a single laggy game since update, and before update I had a few laggy games.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18934
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:27 Post subject: |
|
|
http://kotaku.com/5405217/activision-exec-expect-additional-paid-online-modes
| Quote: | | We have great experience also on Call of Duty with the success we had on Xbox Live and PlayStation Network. A lot of that knowledge is getting actually built into the Battle.Net platform and the design of that. I think it's been mutually beneficial, and you should expect us to test and ultimately launch additional online monetization models of some of some of our biggest franchises like Call of Duty. |
In before Glottis comes and praises it as the best feature ever.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
proddan
Posts: 1066
Location: Gulf of Aden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon25 wrote: | | In before Glottis comes and praises it as the best feature ever. |
Dunno about best feature ever, but if people want to pay for optional bling type components and that funds further development we all benefit from then yes, it is a good thing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 09:55 Post subject: |
|
|
How do we all benefit from it? If this shit succeeds, and it will with the amount of Xbots ready to pay up, half the game will be locked for cash the next time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 10:11 Post subject: |
|
|
@proddan
Works IW own3d hard on this one
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
proddan
Posts: 1066
Location: Gulf of Aden
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 10:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 10:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | | How do we all benefit from it? If this shit succeeds, and it will with the amount of Xbots ready to pay up, half the game will be locked for cash the next time. |
Micro transactions have been around for years and the gaming world as we know it hasn't yet ended.
It's not really any different here despite the drama.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce2007
Banned
Posts: 300
Location: playstation home.
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th Nov 2009 10:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| Yondaime wrote: | | NForce2007 wrote: | @ Glottis
is the PC version worth getting ? any server problems or graphics limitations ? can you set res at 1920x1080 ? i'm not sure which version to go for the PC or Ps3. thanks |
It's worth getting if you're fine with being limited to a matchmaking system where you can't search for specific maps to play with, where you can't set up your own server with specific settings/map rotations, where you can't even play all maps in every mode (for example, you can only play 5-6 maps in FFA even though on consoles you can play FFA on any map in split screen, and it works perfectly fine), where you can't see any ping (you see bars like on consoles), where you sometimes have to be frozen in the middle of a round thanks to the host nerd raging and the migration starting which sometimes fails and thus ruins the whole match.
Then yes, if you're okey with all that, then yes it's worth getting. Between the PS3 and the PC version, the PC version is obviously better, it has mouse and keyboard support... That is always better than a gamepad. |
great response thanks. 
btw what about hackers aka cheaters any on the pc version yet ?
"Support Talented Developers" "ATI Rules" "Proud Owner of PS3"
Q6600 @ 3.5Ghz | 8GB DDR2 1070 | Gigabyte EP45 DS3 | Sapphire HD 4870 | WD 640 HDD | X-Fi Gamer | Corsair TX850 | CM690 +7x120mm Fans| 360 Wireless JPad | LG M227WD (16:9).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 191 of 302 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
