NFOHump.com :: View topic

Page 5 of 235

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 233, 234, 235 Next

swebarb

Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 13:41 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

I hope they learned a mistake releasing a game that actually a decent computer can manage, and not have to wait 2 years Social Club - http://socialclub.rockstargames.com/member/swebarb

Xtrem3X

Posts: 194

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 17:03 Post subject:

swebarb wrote:

I hope they learned a mistake releasing a game that actually a decent computer can manage, and not have to wait 2 years Sad

All decent computers could run Crysis at launch.
The problem was that some people had computers that were 5 years old, or new PCs with cheap low spec graphic cards & expected it to work. Then complained when their £40 gfx card or 5 year old kit couldn't run it.

Profile
PM

StrEagle

Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 17:41 Post subject:

I ran Crysis on relese on XFX GF8800GTX 768M on full details, AAx16. Ran smoothly until last level's fireworks, where i lowered the AA to x2. XFX GF8800GTX 768M was around 150$ at that time (2years+?)...

Lutzifer wrote:

and yes, mine is only average

Profile
PM

litwicki23
Banned

Posts: 215

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 18:03 Post subject:

StrEagle wrote:

Lieer , full details on 8800gtx? <LOOOL>

I cant play on full details on gtx 280 , so you on 8800gtx too

you got maybe 10fps

Profile
PM

LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢

Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 18:08 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Maybe he played on 640x480. My IMDb Ratings \| Fix NFOHump Cookies \| Hide Users / Threads \| Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) \| The Derps Collection Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.

litwicki23
Banned

Posts: 215

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 18:11 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

sure

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 18:28 Post subject:

StrEagle wrote:

ROFL.

I *still* can't run the game on full details with or without anti aliasing and I'm trying it on an XFX 4870-1GB XXX (massively OCed too) I love people that claim to be running the game with highest settings on crappy ancient hardware Very Happy

iNatan wrote:

Maybe he played on 640x480. Laughing

Profile
PM

djaoni

Posts: 8061

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 18:50 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

People tolerate different amounts of FPS. 25+ was just fine in Crysis imo.

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 19:00 Post subject:

djaoni wrote:

People tolerate different amounts of FPS. 25+ was just fine in Crysis imo.

Maybe, maybe not .. but there's no way he even got 25fps with full details.

Profile
PM

ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere

Posts: 65078
Location: Italy

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 19:04 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

I had a GF8800GTX 768M at that time, and what are you saying is absolutely foolish.

Profile
PM

djaoni

Posts: 8061

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 19:13 Post subject:

sabin1981 wrote:

djaoni wrote:

People tolerate different amounts of FPS. 25+ was just fine in Crysis imo.

Maybe, maybe not .. but there's no way he even got 25fps with full details.

Yeah I'm not saying he was playing at 16xAA etc. like he said.

For me it slowed to a crawl above 4x with a 8800GT 512.

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Wed, 6th Jan 2010 19:16 Post subject:

djaoni wrote:

sabin1981 wrote:

djaoni wrote:

People tolerate different amounts of FPS. 25+ was just fine in Crysis imo.

Maybe, maybe not .. but there's no way he even got 25fps with full details.

Yeah I'm not saying he was playing at 16xAA etc. like he said.

For me it slowed to a crawl above 4x with a 8800GT 512.

I know and that's all I was saying Very Happy

If he said "medium with 4xAA" then I'd believe him, as most rigs are capable of Medium settings - it's just his claim, like so many others, is laughable Very Happy

Shit, I'm playing on HIGH now (not V.High, and I also have Shadows on Medium) with 2xAA and I get 40-50fps, with rare drops to high 30s during intense combat.

Profile
PM

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34976
Location: Sweden

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 05:01 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/61891 Release schedule, seems this might be released around the holiday session this year although it's pretty vague.

Profile
PM

llihP

Posts: 27

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 09:25 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

I had a 8800GTX, it ran fine on high with low AA @ 1920 x 1200. High, not max. My laptop with a 7950GT ran it on medium but was a bit choppy.

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 09:28 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Profile
PM

m3th0d2008

Posts: 9881
Location: Outhouse

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 09:37 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

I guess someone is working on his post counter 2011 - 2016 Build • Fractal Design R5 Titanium (Window) • i5-2500K @ 4,5GHz • Corsair Hydro h115i • ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance • 2x4Gb G.Skill Ripjaws F3-10666CL9-4GBRL • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ • Corsair RM550(W) PSU • 2x Samsung 850 Evo (120gb/500gb) • 2018 - x Build • Fractal Design Define R6 Gunmetal • Intel Core i9 9900K • Corsair H150i Pro RGB AIO • Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO • 2x16Gb Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-3200 • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ • Corsair HX850i PSU • 1x Samsung 970 Evo M.2, 1x Samsung 860 Evo SATA, 1x Samsung 850 Evo SATA • Last edited by m3th0d2008 on Tue, 12th Jan 2010 10:30; edited 1 time in total

Profile
PM

LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢

Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 09:44 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

A lot of work ahead. My IMDb Ratings \| Fix NFOHump Cookies \| Hide Users / Threads \| Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) \| The Derps Collection Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.

llihP

Posts: 27

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 10:52 Post subject:

sabin1981 wrote:

Sorry, my computer didn't do that then, because I have so much to gain from lying to impress the mighty condescending sabin.

There was a DX9 and DX10 option as well and 25-30 fps was enough for me. Go grab the same GPU, use Windows XP and the same equipment so you can see how much of an asshat you are. Quicker yet, just look in the mirror.

Profile
PM

SilverBlue

Posts: 1747

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 11:22 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Fight in the back, fight in the back!!!

xGAME007

Posts: 2134
Location: Croatia

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 11:24 Post subject:

llihP wrote:

sabin1981 wrote:

yeah but for some ppl everything below 50-60 fps is shuttering Rolling Eyes

, as they notice the difference between 30-60 fps -.-

Back then when crysis come out i buyed new PC, so it was fine for me Very Happy

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 18:26 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Sure, fella, sure.

Profile
PM

Nui
VIP Member

Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 22:17 Post subject:

m3th0d2008 wrote:

I guess someone is working on his post counter Cool Face

he should stop now, 11111 is such a nice number Very Happy

xGAME007 wrote:

as they notice the difference between 30-60 fps -.-

you dont? I easily do.

Profile
PM

LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢

Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 22:56 Post subject:

Nui wrote:

m3th0d2008 wrote:

I guess someone is working on his post counter Cool Face

he should stop now, 11111 is such a nice number Very Happy

Too late

My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.

Nui
VIP Member

Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels

Posted: Tue, 12th Jan 2010 23:08 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

yeah i noticed that bitch I still cant play that game @ high 1080p, no AA or lets say it is kinda playable, but i still drops in the range below 20 or below 15 even or some such, that it will stutter away... with this rig: E6600 @3.1 GHz, 6 GB ram, HD 4890

Profile
PM

Spiderman
Banned

Posts: 5877

Posted: Wed, 13th Jan 2010 00:26 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

next stop crysissy two in 320*240 in 60fps fuck YEAH !!!

Profile
PM

StrEagle

Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans

Posted: Wed, 13th Jan 2010 18:58 Post subject:

Spoiler:

The CPU is clocked to 3GHz, FSB 333MHz and the video is XFX GF8800 768MB the ram is 4GB DDR2 800MHz = rig from 2007
Edit: the monitor is 17" so that's why the res is 1280x1024
Edit2: the first screen you can see that the version of the game is from 2007 too

Last edited by StrEagle on Wed, 13th Jan 2010 19:07; edited 7 times in total

Profile
PM

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34976
Location: Sweden

Posted: Wed, 13th Jan 2010 19:00 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Hehe, I prefer the "EdgeAA=2" vegetation smoothing compared to normal AA for Crysis, 16x is a bit overkill as well tho it probably looks great. (EDIT: Minus AA but with EdgeAA and other tweaks* and at the same settings at 1680x1050 was how I ran the game with a 2900XT, around 20 FPS or so but I made it trough both it and Warhead, had a 4870X2 for Warhead though but Crossfire performance is still improving so it wasn't all that great initially, heh.) (*Basically went trough the config files and tweak guides and pushed stuff like view distance, LOD, draw distance and resolution for shadows and similar way higher than intended, 20 FPS is fine to me though so might as well take advantage of it and push image quality further, haha.)