[Other] PS3 - New Supercomputer??
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
MuterFurker




Posts: 40

PostPosted: Mon, 14th Feb 2005 22:36    Post subject:
The programming problems come in the way the Cell system operates.

It has certain instruction sets baked into each cell, so different media calls will be written for different cells. In programming terms this is not only a whole bucket load of extra work, but due to the fact they are going to be running eight instructions sets through eight cells at the same time the possibility for errors is highly increased.

Its really going to take a motherload of work to get it stable.

Some people think it may never be stable or time efficient enough for use in anything except console games. Given the higher number of possible factors that can cause PC code problems, having these multiple sets all doing their own shit all over the place could cause so many bugs, crashes and errors it simply wont be good.

Not sure yet though, we will wait and see.

The idea of Cell stacking is theoretically possible, but until they perfect the ability to code for a single cell chip you can forget about stacking 2 or any more together.

Even stacking 2 regular CPUs causes unwanted headaches and isnt the most popualr supported choice on a PC. I dont think Cell architecture is going to encourage people either.

Wouldnt worry though, 4ghz running pure games with no OS overhead ect is fuck load of power, we have seen what xbox and PS2 can do with a fraction of the power, so multiply that by five and its a nice possibility.

Still, i stikc with my PC. Why change the habit of a lifetime?
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Mon, 14th Feb 2005 22:59    Post subject:
I have faith in IBM.
It had been different though if XGI *cough* volari duo *cough* had made it Laughing Wink
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 05:53    Post subject:
pallebrum, have you not read already that developers are worried about how hard it's going to be to work with and how a lot of them have avoided signing with sony yet? this is just another hype run by sony. PS: whoever said something about the graphics card being the fastest ever by nvidia: it will be equal to the card nvidia comes out with for pc at or around the same time which will essentially be the same thing LOL. and then 6 months later it will be way out of date.

However, I'm debating getting this or the xbox 2 as I haven't had a console since the n64 Razz


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 12:18    Post subject:
Ofcourse I have but it's in their theory. And we all know that the theory is not always what it turns out to be right? Wink Volari duo by XGI is good proof on that Very Happy
And since it's IBM, I have faith.

Cheez-It wrote:
PS: whoever said something about the graphics card being the fastest ever by nvidia: it will be equal to the card nvidia comes out with for pc at or around the same time which will essentially be the same thing LOL.


Wrong. Nvidia have even said it will be the fastest ever and since it's the fastest ever it cant be equal on the pc since two fastest ever is impossible Wink. I will find the quote for you (hopefully).
Back to top
Nailbiter
PUNK



Posts: 6061

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 12:20    Post subject:
Cheez-It wrote:


However, I'm debating getting this or the xbox 2 as I haven't had a console since the n64 Razz


i think im going to wait for a year when the next gen consoles come to buy one.

first to see the pricetag drop, and second to see what games they will have, and third to see what is the mod friendliest.
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 12:25    Post subject:
I will wait more than that, I will wait untill there is a way to backup Very Happy
And that will take some time (way more than a year, look at the gamecube) since blue ray is being used on the ps3 :/
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 13:05    Post subject:
Im not bothered about backing up... Imagine what the new GTA's will look like Very Happy


George W Bush -

'...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas.'
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 13:17    Post subject:
IBM is making a super computer based on the cell, the Blue Gene/C (C = Cyclops). I didn't know this. But sounds really sweet. Smile

Yeah, the new gta game will be insane Shocked
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 19:12    Post subject:
pallebrun wrote:

Nvidia have even said it will be the fastest ever and since it's the fastest ever it cant be equal on the pc since two fastest ever is impossible Wink. I will find the quote for you (hopefully).


wrong
doh!

from the man himself

David Roman NVIDIA’s Vice President of Corporate Marketing :

This is the next generation GPU, so after the GeForce 6 series this is going to be the next generation. So, this will be everything we have in GeForce 6 + whatever else we bring out. Obviously it will support DirectX 9, shader models 3, it will be the most feature-rich, the most powerful GPU that we’ve ever created actually, when it comes out.

soi figure that next series of pc gpu graphic cards due out on PC next year 2006, mmmmm... making it equal to what will be available on the ps3 when released in 2006 , proabably PS3 1st , followed by PC
Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 19:47    Post subject:
Well they've already started developing for the Xbox 2, which is what i'm looking forward too.

What is nintendo's answer to all this? They came late into the console war anyway.
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 19:50    Post subject:
Exactly, it will be " the most powerful GPU that we’ve ever created actually, when it comes out". And the ps3 will get it first (pc's will get it most likley soon after though) and therefor have the fastest available gpu ever created from nvidia. Exactly what i said Razz


I see that I missed that you wrote "around the same time" which can mean soon after, my misstake.


Edit: Yeah I want to see nintendos answer. I'm quite curious to see what they have been cooking. Maybe they will own completley.....
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 20:12    Post subject:
So far in my opinion in the console war, Nintendo is down at the bottom and Sony is at the Top Smile


George W Bush -

'...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas.'
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 20:19    Post subject:
the console that will own will be the one that can be modified and can play backups, name a console thats been successfull without this happening, Sony could actually be shooting themselves in the foot, as last i heard xbox2 may be going back to standard dvd format as its cheaper

also wondering with all this super stuff in the ps3 on how much will it actually cost and how much of a profit loss Sony will have to go to get it on the street.
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Tue, 15th Feb 2005 20:49    Post subject:
That is actually not true at all. Look on how long it took before a modchip were available on the ps2, it took ages, but people still bought it like there was no tomorrow.
Modchips will never be the factor that decide wether a console sell good or not.

The console that will own the sold-units-chart is the console with most games and many popular games, just like it was with this generation. Sony and the Ps2 had most games and also sold most units by far. Many different games to choose from is one hell of a reason for many when they buy a console. It doesn't have to be 100% quality (which isn't even possible with so many games), it's just the fact that there is so many to choose from that mathers.

This next round, one of the reasons for which console people will buy is which games they liked on the other console (ps2, xbox or gamecube), and therefor expect a followup. this is what I personally go by. I want my MGS games and I want my console rpg's (final fantasy etc) and my 3d platform games so I stick with the system I know will deliver these, and that is most likley the ps3.
Back to top
Sublime




Posts: 8615

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 02:34    Post subject:
well i didnt read all this thread only up to the ps2 running on magic bollocks. haven't you heard of optimising engines? if you've noticed PC games cover a wide range of specs with min-recommended whereas the PS2 can only accomodate the 300mhz it has. The fact it is running on "magic" and has been doing it for so long (as you claim) then im sure that the xbox or anything else for that matter can outperform it once it has reached it's lifespan. Look at games like metroid prime 2 and how good that looks, its better than any PS2 game i know of.


Stealth88 and Lod|_Dod| wrote:
"And the winner is.... Sublime!" That fucking kid is always right. Sublime FTW!

http://artpad.art.com/?irqy7s4162w <3 you too
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 02:54    Post subject:
Hehe. You clearly didn't understand my post at all so let me explain it again. Smile
What I meant with "magic" is that it shuldn't have the power to render the graphic it does (jak3, snake eater etc) for number of resons, but since the emotion engine is good in it's self it can, without the need of much processing power (or much vram, althogh more than 4mb had been good) like for example the xbox which would die with only 300mhz since it's built around raw power and not "magic".
This I call "magic". But really, take the "magic" with a grain of salt ok? Razz Very Happy


I have played metroid prime 2 by the way and I can say that I was not impressed. It was indeed very sexy, but I expected those graphics from the system, so no surprises there. I was far more impressed with Jak3 on the ps2 considering the hardware the ps2 has. I was totally surprised that it could render that game at such high framerates, totally awesome.

Note that I'm so not a fanboy of sony or the ps2. I'm talking from a technical point of view. Fanboys shuld not even bother to discuss about these things since they cant be objective about anything else than their own favourite things. I pee on fanboys Laughing
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 09:50    Post subject:
well i tend to buy all consoles anyway, as i'm a true gamer and not someone who has to say i ain't buying X console cos its done by X company or isn't as powerful as mine.

So in the end its us the consumer that benifits from all this like at presentr as i own xbox with chip + 120 gig HD, Silver PS2 with chip + eyetoy, and Gamecube with Viper chip, plus my pc - so think i'm covered ,lol

soon to get DS and PSP
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 10:57    Post subject:
dont get a DS, Most people I know are selling them right now to buy a PSP Razz


George W Bush -

'...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas.'
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 11:07    Post subject:
both are great, and both i'll get, just love mario, yoshi, wario ware ect,ect.

Why would i only get what you class the only option, see my point why Playstation fans ain't real gamers but just mainstream people who have been brainwashed by Sony into thinking that gaming is just about PSP Or PS2/3 by all the bullcrap that Sony does on its marketing.

Yes i will get a PSP, DS is out 1st here in Uk, yes i shall get a PS3 but again xbox 2 is out 1st. There is too many games in each system to say i'll stick to only one becase its the best
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Wed, 16th Feb 2005 15:18    Post subject:
mcmanic wrote:
see my point why Playstation fans ain't real gamers but just mainstream people who have been brainwashed by Sony


LOL

I have consoles / handhelds that you probably have never heard of... eg - GP32 made by game park ( if you are a TRUE gamer you would own one of these) , Philips G7000 (Very Retro console) and more.

Currently Hooked up to my Portable TV in my room I have an Amiga 500, PSX, PS2, N64, SNES, NES, Dreamcast, Mastersystem and Mega Drive. All that in 1 TV that only has 1 Scart lead and 1 Arial Input Razz (you gotta see all the Arial / Scart splitters)....


George W Bush -

'...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas.'
Back to top
YZFas




Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 09:53    Post subject:
mcmanic wrote:
OMG here we go again, do you remember the uber specs of the ps2 and its "Emotion Engine" , lol - what a joke that was, expect no difference this time.

These new consoles will be good but nothing like what they are being hyped up to be as per usual



What? A joke? Did you see GT4? It looks amazing.

No joke for me......
Back to top
Sublime




Posts: 8615

PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 10:16    Post subject:
yes it might look good, but when you think about what a driving game has to render it's not so spectacular.


Stealth88 and Lod|_Dod| wrote:
"And the winner is.... Sublime!" That fucking kid is always right. Sublime FTW!

http://artpad.art.com/?irqy7s4162w <3 you too
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 13:16    Post subject:
Not Spectacular???? Look at it!!! -

















the Game Looks AMAZING for running on a 300mhz machine, hell my AMD 1600+ machine doesnt even look like it can run that game Razz

more here - http://media.playstationpro2.com/gallery/gran_turismo4-6.html


George W Bush -

'...more and more of our imports are coming from overseas.'
Back to top
YZFas




Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 17:20    Post subject:
Sublime wrote:
yes it might look good, but when you think about what a driving game has to render it's not so spectacular.


I don't care what does what. I look at my TV and i see very good graphics. I like them i'm happy, what else do i need ?
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 19:37    Post subject:
yeah not bad for replays!

the actual ingame graphics are above par but nothing major, unless you use the hardware to enable 1080i mode, which has be removed from UK/europe editions.


again getting shafted by Sony
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Thu, 17th Feb 2005 21:17    Post subject:
OK If you are looking at those pictures and think they look good, you are obviously a console gamer. I don't get how anyone could consider those good graphics. They look like Need for Speed Porsche Unleashed ERA graphics, or worse... And it would look that way on any resolution.


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Fri, 18th Feb 2005 01:04    Post subject:
Are you guys for real?
Play the prolouge demo and then come back and tell us how bad it looks.
GT4 looks amazing, saying something else is just stupid.

Look at these movies. They are gorgeous.
http://streamingmovies.ign.com/ps2/article/570/570452/gt4_120304_clip1_wmvlow.wmv?wu=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.ps2.ign.com%2Fmedia%2F489%2F489327%2Fvid_1001126.html%3Fmu%3D%3CURL%2F%3E
http://streamingmovies.ign.com/ps2/article/576/576553/granturismo4_010205_clip6_wmvlow.wmv?wu=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.ps2.ign.com%2Fmedia%2F489%2F489327%2Fvid_1015829.html%3Fmu%3D%3CURL%2F%3E
http://streamingmovies.ign.com/cars/GT4_042704_01_wmvlow.wmv?wu=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.ps2.ign.com%2Fmedia%2F489%2F489327%2Fvid_813675.html%3Fmu%3D%3CURL%2F%3E
http://streamingmovies.ign.com/cars/GT4_041904_TT_01_wmvlow.wmv?wu=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.ps2.ign.com%2Fmedia%2F489%2F489327%2Fvid_807585.html%3Fmu%3D%3CURL%2F%3E

And how this game looks in replays is how the game looks while playing (replays are done using the ingame engine, like in mgs), so whining that it's replay shots and therefor looks good, is just dumb.
I have also played the prolouge demo so I know this for a fact.


And here are shots on porsche unleashed. You are right, it looks identical to GT4 (Yeah right). Rolling Eyes
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/driving/needforspeedporscheu/screenindex.html
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/013/013845/imgs_1.html
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Fri, 18th Feb 2005 06:54    Post subject:
I exaggerated a little Razz but honestly, I don't think GT4 looks good, it looks like a console game with poorly made graphics. I'm sure it'll be an amazing game, but I find it's graphics sub par.


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Fri, 18th Feb 2005 09:14    Post subject:
i have played the prolouge demo, i'm also playing the GT4 jap version imported!

The ingame graphics are nothing like them above, only replays and photo mode, so infact your lying m8, the 1st picture is ingame footage as you can see the jaggies, the rest are replays or photo mode.

Please stop the sony fan bullcr@p and admit your wrong, lol
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Fri, 18th Feb 2005 14:30    Post subject:
edit: Ah forget it, why bother.
I leave it at.

Ok.
Back to top
Page 2 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group