| Page 2 of 2 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 16th Feb 2010 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| KeyserSoeze wrote: | I never got SF 2 working, it was never cracked when i looked at it.
I liked SF 1, gonna give this a try again now, good tips JB  |
You didn't lose much IMO. SF2 ruined everything that was so great and unique in SF1, the only improvement was the graphics which I couldn't give a damn about. Gameplay was made similar to any other "basic" RTS out there. Pity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Feb 2010 01:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| Glottis wrote: | | Namarie wrote: | | I am still sticking to "Jowood - wont touch it with a 10ft pole until 5 years has passed since launch of product". |
Spellforce games were never known for being buggy or having technical issues but whatever... it's your loss. |
I guess you weren't there for the starforce meltdown.. 
Meanwhile, JoWood blantantly stood by and supported StarForce, even as they (SF) put up "LOOK HOW EASY IT IS TO PIRATE GAMES" links with another really good game that didn't have copy protection. Jowood's response, "Well, it is a good example on why you want copy protection on your games.... "....... ........ ..........
Nevah, evah, evah, again, another JoW game.. Which is a shame, because I did like SF1, and SF2. But, I don't really wan't to indirectly support some things on the software market.
Last edited by Namarie on Wed, 17th Feb 2010 01:16; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vassago
Posts: 635
Location: Wanking in hell
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Feb 2010 01:09 Post subject: |
|
|
SF 2 is a good game, great reviews everywhere.
Played it a lot.
Hulk to superman: Puny man, who wears his underwear on the outside.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 26th Feb 2010 14:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Spellforce and Spellforce 2 are part of the Steam weekend deals =) Spellforce Platinum (first game + expansions) for €3.75 and Spellforce 2 Gold (second game + expansions) for €7.50.
Bargain ^_^
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 35031
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Mar 2010 06:27 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Mar 2010 11:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| JBeckman wrote: | http://worthplaying.com/article/2010/3/8/news/72905/
More screens. |
Looks very sharp?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Mar 2010 18:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| KeyserSoeze wrote: | | DrHobo wrote: | | KeyserSoeze wrote: | I never got SF 2 working, it was never cracked when i looked at it.
I liked SF 1, gonna give this a try again now, good tips JB |
You didn't lose much IMO. SF2 ruined everything that was so great and unique in SF1, the only improvement was the graphics which I couldn't give a damn about. Gameplay was made similar to any other "basic" RTS out there. Pity. |
In what way did it get worse?
Haven't gotten that far yet.
SF1 was a very good game, they created a new concept with the mix of RTS/RPG, also had good gfx and descent lvl system. |
Just my opinion, but without the rune warriors, the game just wasn't the same. No more "collecting" rune warriors and servants who you could summon, instead you have a party and a regular army. How original...
I liked the fact that in SF1, you had your rune warriors and on many levels you could actually choose which force to build up (multiple monuments belonging to different races in maps), or to even build forces at all. And yes, you actually had to chose, because different alignment forces actually attacked each other even if you controlled them both! It was great, one time I tried to unite my elven and night elf forces to tackle one of the überbosses of the Mosaic questline. To my surprise the 2 forces actually slaughtered each other... however surprised I was, it was still quite fun to watch
The character development also took quite a beating... skills and items in SF2 were just... boring. In SF1, each rune warrior you had had special skillsets. This gave them a personality.
In SF1, you actually could go back to previous levels to do other quests in later parts of the game. Resources regenerated slowly, so it was possible to experiment and have fun. Some of the quests probably couldn't even be done without the additional resources (eg mosaic quests).
Additionally, SF2 seems to focus much more on the RTS part. The RPG part just didn't feel that fresh to me in SF2.
I probably could go on. Don't get me wrong, SF2 is not a bad game by all means, it's just that compared to SF1, I found it generic and uninteresting. I probably expected too much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 1st May 2010 00:32 Post subject: |
|
|
any news about the addon? should have come out in april
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 35031
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 13th May 2010 15:11 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah too bad found now on a site 20 september release date
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st Oct 2010 20:53 Post subject: |
|
|
bump
the new addon got released?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 1st Oct 2010 22:20 Post subject: |
|
|
IGN says November, and the official website still says coming soon.
NO LINKS TO ILLEGAL STUFF IN SIGS - DLC IS ILLEGAL TOO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 14th Jan 2011 15:22 Post subject: |
|
|
its supposed to be out today but there is no scene release yet
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 14th Jan 2011 16:43 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 14th Jan 2011 22:08 Post subject: |
|
|
FYI this is a JoWood/Trine game and they are in money trouble currently. They filed for bankruptcy already. Dont expect anything else than a rip off, just as usual. If it ever comes out...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 14th Jan 2011 23:02 Post subject: |
|
|
hope they sort it out, for all misdeed jowood did, every oldschool gamer played and loved jowood games
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 35031
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 00:08 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ClaudeFTW
Posts: 5074
Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 12:11 Post subject: |
|
|
What a surprise.
EA should acquire the rights to this. They own Phenomic damn it. Oh, wait...
Trine Games? TRINE GAMES is making Faith in Destiny?
Fuck this shit, no way I'm buying or even downloading it. Those bastards made G3: Forsaken Gods.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 13:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Smikis. wrote: | | hope they sort it out, for all misdeed jowood did, every oldschool gamer played and loved jowood games |
I never forgave them after the Starforce crapola...
Good riddance!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 13:47 Post subject: |
|
|
fuck, and after all those post on steam forums that faith in destiny is coming in late spring/early summer..
hopefully it will come out , they still say " game is not ready " instead of some other excuse they could trow if they arent planing to release at all
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 14:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Smikis. wrote: |
fuck, and after all those post on steam forums that faith in destiny is coming in late spring/early summer..
hopefully it will come out , they still say " game is not ready " instead of some other excuse they could trow if they arent planing to release at all |
It's being developed by TRINE and published by JOWOOD, which will probably go bankrupt soon.
You really surprised?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 15:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bendi wrote: | | Smikis. wrote: |
fuck, and after all those post on steam forums that faith in destiny is coming in late spring/early summer..
hopefully it will come out , they still say " game is not ready " instead of some other excuse they could trow if they arent planing to release at all |
It's being developed by TRINE and published by JOWOOD, which will probably go bankrupt soon.
You really surprised? |
bankruptcy is exactly why they should release, to either avoid bankruptcy, or product should be sold to another publisher after bankrupt, since it will belong to state at that point
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 2 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
