| Page 31 of 41 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 21st Mar 2010 18:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
| litwicki23 wrote: | in some forum i find screens comparison between dx 11 and dx 10 . Tesselation OFF and ON , POV ON and OFF......no difference , maybe in some of screen a bag is little more sharp
but visually nothing , FRAMERATE only is a big huge difference |
You are just stating the obvious, but don't worry about that. 
It's been discussed before, also on the Aliens Vs. Predator 3 subject. It's basically not worth it in actual (launched) games to hamper the framerate just for the sake of playing on dx11. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Mar 2010 18:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, tesselation should also allow a better method of LOD, which should both increase frame rate and make it easier for developers.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Mar 2010 19:19 Post subject: |
|
|
What's with menu characters?
 Spoiler: | |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 21st Mar 2010 20:17 Post subject: |
|
|
buahahaha 
You didn't copy all the files from the crack folder you fooooooool just like I didn't 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 00:15 Post subject: |
|
|
How can I turn off the xbox gamepad ? During the game it's always referring to gamepad controls (press A or X to do this etc.) Can I get it to show keyboards keys?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 01:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Guess I have to toss away my computer that I just bought last year. Can't handle this game not even at high settings. Very High makes FPS go to lower teens when outside. High makes them 18-20 outside. Have to turn into Normal to get around 30 FPS. Specs: C2D E7400 @ 2.8 GHZ, 4 GB RAM, 9800GT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24625
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 01:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| JRFSkrEEmeR wrote: | | Guess I have to toss away my computer that I just bought last year. Can't handle this game not even at high settings. Very High makes FPS go to lower teens when outside. High makes them 18-20 outside. Have to turn into Normal to get around 30 FPS. Specs: C2D E7400 @ 2.8 GHZ, 4 GB RAM, 9800GT. |
The CPU and 9800GT are both low-mid level (weak points) and you'd be best off with 800*600 or possibly 1024*768 with moderate settings.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 01:44 Post subject: |
|
|
lol? I play at high settings 1600x1050 with a 8800gt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 01:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| Frant wrote: | | JRFSkrEEmeR wrote: | | Guess I have to toss away my computer that I just bought last year. Can't handle this game not even at high settings. Very High makes FPS go to lower teens when outside. High makes them 18-20 outside. Have to turn into Normal to get around 30 FPS. Specs: C2D E7400 @ 2.8 GHZ, 4 GB RAM, 9800GT. |
The CPU and 9800GT are both low-mid level (weak points) and you'd be best off with 800*600 or possibly 1024*768 with moderate settings. |
I disagree with you Frant. I have C2D E6750 (OCed to 3GHz), 8800GT, 2GB RAM and my game is running fine on high settings 1280x1024 something about 30 fps, ofcourse there are some drops in more demanding sequences but that is fine by me considering how good the game looks. JRFSkrEEmeR be sure to have newest drivers (197.13) for your GPU and try to OC your CPU a little bit and you should be fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:01 Post subject: |
|
|
I run at 1280x1024, my monitor's max res. Lower than that tends to make things ugly. Just updated to 197.13, but these newer drivers break Crysis for some reason, dunno why. Makes Crysis stutter unbearably. I've been running the game in DX10, so I'll do it in DX9 and see the difference too. Not too sure about overclocking the CPU though, I don't think it's safe enough with my cooling.
I'm brazilian, so I don't have the same easy access to awesome hardware like you guys.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24625
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:01 Post subject: |
|
|
The E7400 have less L2-cache than the E6750 even.
GTAIV is a CPU-intensive game and dual-core 2.8Ghz CPU with only 3mb L2-cache is going to suffer.
The 9800GT is basically a shrunk 8800GT and not quite up to the task of modern games at high resolution.
30fps is not enjoyable in my book, but that's my personal preference.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:04 Post subject: |
|
|
Frant, I play through Crysis at 20-25ish FPS and I don't see any problem. Seems smooth enough for me. I don't run extremely high resolutions anyway. And sorry, but that is like one of the best computers affordable here in Brazil.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:21 Post subject: |
|
|
JrfsnrmkRreFfuu your PC should totally run this game at 1280x1024. Don't let some high-end nerd confuse you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Well some of us just can't play a certain game without 5020x3500 + 16FSAA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| FastMemFirst wrote: | | JrfsnrmkRreFfuu your PC should totally run this game at 1280x1024. Don't let some high-end nerd confuse you. |
But that is the performance I'm getting nonetheless. Can only run well on Normal setting.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| Frant wrote: | The E7400 have less L2-cache than the E6750 even.
GTAIV is a CPU-intensive game and dual-core 2.8Ghz CPU with only 3mb L2-cache is going to suffer.
The 9800GT is basically a shrunk 8800GT and not quite up to the task of modern games at high resolution.
30fps is not enjoyable in my book, but that's my personal preference. |
About GTA4, my PC can run it pretty well at 1280x1024 if I don't max the sliders out. I run it with the texture settings on High and the rest of the stuff on Very High, and the draw distance bars the same as the console versions and it's very enjoyable, without a single problem.
*inb4thisressucksandyourpcsuckslolconsolebitch*
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24625
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| FireMaster wrote: | | Well some of us just can't play a certain game without 5020x3500 + 16FSAA |
Heh, I run in the same res as you, 1680*1050 and I've only got a 4890 and E8200 @ 3.4Ghz and I get somewhere around 40-50fps.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Last edited by Frant on Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 03:34; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 02:44 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi can anybody help me out please, i'm stuck here 
| Spoiler: | I'm at the level or sublevel lost catacombs and dunno how to go any further on ...
somebody is yealing: 'here is the market stay calm, uncle burbon will get us in' and the other one yeals something like:
'hey people open up, don't let your two legged brethern die a foolish dead' or something like that
|
Stultorum infinitus numerus est
System: MSI B75MA-E33 / Intel i5-3470 / Geil DDR3 16 GB 1600 mhz / GIGABYTE 11GB D5X GTX 1080 Ti / Dell P2415Q / Crucial MX100 256 GB / Seagate 3500 & 2000 / Razor Abyssus 1800 / Coolermaster 650M
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 03:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| JRFSkrEEmeR wrote: | | But that is the performance I'm getting nonetheless. Can only run well on Normal setting. |
Well, don't be too disappointed. Even on my qx9650 @3.8ghz and a 5870 I still only get 20'ish fps with everything maxed at 1920*1200.
It's just one of those games. This is far more demanding than *anything* else out there, including Crysis and StalkerCS.
Here's some graphics card performance numbers for Metro: http://vr-zone.com/forums/582617/metro-2033-benchmarked-pcgh-.html
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 03:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| shittingaround wrote: | Hi can anybody help me out please, i'm stuck here
| Spoiler: | I'm at the level or sublevel lost catacombs and dunno how to go any further on ...
somebody is yealing: 'here is the market stay calm, uncle burbon will get us in' and the other one yeals something like:
'hey people open up, don't let your two legged brethern die a foolish dead' or something like that
|
|
| Spoiler: | you should be with burbon.. as your teamate traveling together.. and you should be on the rails.. reaching big ass doors.. if you not there.. and if ur not with burbon.. you clearly managed to ruin scripted game in ways we cant imagine .. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 05:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| shittingaround wrote: | Hi can anybody help me out please, i'm stuck here
| Spoiler: | I'm at the level or sublevel lost catacombs and dunno how to go any further on ...
somebody is yealing: 'here is the market stay calm, uncle burbon will get us in' and the other one yeals something like:
'hey people open up, don't let your two legged brethern die a foolish dead' or something like that
|
|
| Spoiler: | there is a ladder back to the rails. you can reach it from water (its not toxic) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 07:53 Post subject: |
|
|
With my gtx260, very high detail, adv.physX off, no aa, 1680x1050 I'm getting better results than them. almost equivalent to their gtx285 numbers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vagrant
Posts: 281
Location: Outer Heaven
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 08:23 Post subject: |
|
|
It's been a while since i played this kind of game, old school, rail shooter. The thing i found most surprising, was that sneaking and silent takedowns actualy worked, and you dont need to 'clear' the level, you can save ammo and be sneaky and leave a lot of enemies alive.
Very surprised, great game.
p.s
Trying to imagine a new Stalker game, with some elements or ideas borrowed from Metro... not to mention graphics.... :O
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 08:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| Vagrant wrote: | It's been a while since i played this kind of game, old school, rail shooter. The thing i found most surprising, was that sneaking and silent takedowns actualy worked, and you dont need to 'clear' the level, you can save ammo and be sneaky and leave a lot of enemies alive.
Very surprised, great game. |
The stealth parts also have their flaws tho.
If one enemy see you, even if he is alone with you in that room and he doesn't scream nor shoot before you kill him, all enemies on that 'mission' are aware of your presence and they now exactly where you are, you can't hide anymore.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 31 of 41 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
