| Page 125 of 179 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
It's pretty lame how there are quite a few campaign-only units for the Terran.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Racecar101
Posts: 258
Location: somewhere in miami
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:11 Post subject: |
|
|
it's a very shallow rts there's no cover system or certain units able to hold off many like in coh.
Sorry but the gameplay is like c&c 3 utterly shallow with no depth what so ever.
Only blind diehard starcraft and blizzard fans rate this, had this game came out 5 years ago i would have said yea great game but ahem coh came out in 2006 and shits all over this from a great height.
I think the only reason people don't like coh is because they suck at it and find the micro in this far easier.
My biggest issue is there being no cover system and that protoss and zerg seem crap and hard to gain empathy to play with.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| bringiton wrote: | | I'd even buy the game, but then I'd STILL be unable to play LAN with my brother, because he doesn't want to buy it. And he is only interested in playing LAN with me, nothing else. So buying this twice just for LAN is BS... |
This is why spawned copies were such great features with original Starcraft and Warcraft2.
It allowed playing LAN MP with friends with single legal copy, and was a good way to promote the game (to make friends buy their own copies later, either for campaign or battle.net MP).
.
Really, why would someone who barely head about the game, want to buy it in order to be able to play it with his friends that already have a copy. I mean, you need to be able to try i first, not other way around.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:55 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if you have two computers behind a switch or a router, aren't you technically playing in LAN (same thing like when you're sending a file between two Live Messengers behind a router or switch, transfer speed goes up to LAN speed)? I mean, it's not like absolutely everything in your match is syncing with the battle.net?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:56 Post subject: |
|
|
I am sure that now, somewhere in Russia, in a darkened room, a shady figure is sitting on a dusty desk with quite some empty vodka bottles on it, and he is anxiously creating an multiplayer utility on his crackzor system :}
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 23:58 Post subject: |
|
|
In Soviet Russia, multiplayer utility creates you! lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 00:10 Post subject: |
|
|
After playing the campaign for about an hour.
I can't get round how this game has taken 5 years to complete?
Doesn't seem that good a game to me atm.
All though i ain't tried multiplayer of got very far in the campaign yet.
Ryzen 5 3600 cpu@3.60 Mhz.
hyper x 32 gb ddr 4 memory.
Msi Carbon gaming pro ac motherboard.
Evga 600 psu.
Msi Armour rx 8 gb 5700 Graphic card.
Ps4 Standard 500gb.
Lg 4k 42 inch tv.
Oculus Quest 2.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 00:14 Post subject: |
|
|
You can't really see anything after an hour of play.
You really need to play at least 3-5 missions to get actual feel of campaign (to get to Hyperion and unlock all it's rooms).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spajdr
Posts: 1842
Location: Czechia
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 00:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| Theescapist wrote: | After playing the campaign for about an hour.
I can't get round how this game has taken 5 years to complete?
Doesn't seem that good a game to me atm.
All though i ain't tried multiplayer of got very far in the campaign yet. |
Thats how it works in Blizzard, no pressure on finishing something quickly, i wonder how much hours blizzard stuff spent everyday to do something, for example on Diablo III.
If starcraft 2 was their first game, it would be finished in year and half max, but now? Sometimes i fear i wont be alive until they make sequel to some of their games.
Game is fine, but surely it dont show 5 years of (hard) work.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
helvete
Posts: 2727
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dr-nix
Posts: 996
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 01:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| dezztroy wrote: | | It's pretty lame how there are quite a few campaign-only units for the Terran. |
They are not available in the multiplayer-mode because they would break the balance (something StarCraft is very known for)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 01:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| dr-nix wrote: | | dezztroy wrote: | | It's pretty lame how there are quite a few campaign-only units for the Terran. |
They are not available in the multiplayer-mode because they would break the balance (something StarCraft is very known for) |
See... that's the part I don't understand. There were Firebats in the FIRST StarCraft MP... so why aren't they in this one? Obviously the first one was balanced with Firebats. IMO the reason they're not in MP is because they're either going to be a microtransaction addition or an exclusive MP features of the upcoming expansions.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 01:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| dr-nix wrote: | | dezztroy wrote: | | It's pretty lame how there are quite a few campaign-only units for the Terran. |
They are not available in the multiplayer-mode because they would break the balance (something StarCraft is very known for) |
Then maybe they could.. You know.. Balance them?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 01:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| spajdr wrote: | | Theescapist wrote: | After playing the campaign for about an hour.
I can't get round how this game has taken 5 years to complete?
Doesn't seem that good a game to me atm.
All though i ain't tried multiplayer of got very far in the campaign yet. |
Thats how it works in Blizzard, no pressure on finishing something quickly, i wonder how much hours blizzard stuff spent everyday to do something, for example on Diablo III.
If starcraft 2 was their first game, it would be finished in year and half max, but now? Sometimes i fear i wont be alive until they make sequel to some of their games.
Game is fine, but surely it dont show 5 years of (hard) work. |
Defiantly m8 i agree.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kumkss
Posts: 4834
Location: Chile
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 02:51 Post subject: |
|
|
yo guys... where are the zerg and protoss campaign?? are they sold separately?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 03:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| kumkss wrote: | | yo guys... where are the zerg and protoss campaign?? are they sold separately? |
Yes.
You will have to wait for them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 05:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| xax232 wrote: |  |
Yes, it's quite understandable that you are confused from concepts such as ground cover and unit formation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 05:54 Post subject: |
|
|
This is safe? Blizzard wouldn't ban my key if I used this?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 09:41 Post subject: |
|
|
Decent game, but the ending was kinda meh. Felt rushed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 11:22 Post subject: |
|
|
It was cool, except that cowboy shit..
| Lutzifer wrote: | | and yes, mine is only average |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 12:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| fissesvin wrote: | | Decent game, but the ending was kinda meh. Felt rushed. |
+1
A nice RTS title but nothing too revolutionary or unworldly as some are trying to imply. I really can't fathom all the fuss and racket when it comes to stacraft. I enjoyed it but more like in the range of 6/10 and nothing more. In my opinion, this game's unduly overrated.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 12:16 Post subject: |
|
|
Hey there, I have a question about regions and language:
I have downloaded the RZR version, in english so; I just got a German cd key (DE). Will this mean I will play on german servers? Will this mean if I used the RZR version with the key, my game will still be in English?
Thanks for your help!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 125 of 179 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
) microtransactions? please. do you realize how that will fuck up the competitive scene? blizz would never let anything come between sc2 and esports.
