| Page 126 of 179 |
W123
Posts: 2456
Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 12:32 Post subject: |
|
|
In my oppinion COH is far superior to this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 13:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Proves what a bunch of con merchants this blizzard studio is.
5 years in the making pull the fucking other one.
Command and conquer tiberium is virtually the same game.
I hope multiplayer saves this because the single campaign is utterly shit.
Ryzen 5 3600 cpu@3.60 Mhz.
hyper x 32 gb ddr 4 memory.
Msi Carbon gaming pro ac motherboard.
Evga 600 psu.
Msi Armour rx 8 gb 5700 Graphic card.
Ps4 Standard 500gb.
Lg 4k 42 inch tv.
Oculus Quest 2.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 13:40 Post subject: |
|
|
I loved the single player in this, ok the ending was abit rushed and dissapointing but generally it was good.
Waiting for protos/zerg expansion.
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 14:06 Post subject: |
|
|
| fissesvin wrote: | | Decent game, but the ending was kinda meh. Felt rushed. |
Because it's not THE ending and completely opens the story for the expansion. Expansion that we were supposed to play with Kerrigan.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 14:24 Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder how they want to make such a campaign with the Zerg. With the Protoss I could understand how they would create characters that you care for.
But with the Zerg, would you have Kerrigan run around some slimy Overseer and talk to Zerglings and Mutalisks? I don't think you would be able to sympathize with any Zerg character...
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”
- Albert Camus
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
(Nexus)
Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 16:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| bringiton wrote: | I wonder how they want to make such a campaign with the Zerg. With the Protoss I could understand how they would create characters that you care for.
But with the Zerg, would you have Kerrigan run around some slimy Overseer and talk to Zerglings and Mutalisks? I don't think you would be able to sympathize with any Zerg character... |
 Spoiler: | seeing how kerrigan is a human now, zerg will probably work together with terran/protoss? that's assuming she still has control of w/e zerg is left. maybe 2nd campaign is about kerrigan trying to regain control of the zerg and third campaign is about fighting the xelnaga  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 18:17 Post subject: |
|
|
battle.net is down, i can't even post on the forum because it does not recognize my SC2 character on the main page, never will buy some battle.net crap again ...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 18:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| mehee wrote: | | battle.net is down, i can't even post on the forum because it does not recognize my SC2 character on the main page, never will buy some battle.net crap again ... |
Battle.net (together with WoW servers) goes down every week for maintenance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 18:38 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34727
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 18:45 Post subject: |
|
|
We can still play offline so it's not a tragedy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 19:54 Post subject: |
|
|
I love walking around the ship talking to everyone between missions, great touch.
People complaining about no inovations well the game is almost exactly like Starcraft which was the goal I believe for blizzard so mission accomplished, the fans got what they wanted, if it ain't broken don't bloody mess with it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
OK so I never played Starcraft before and started playing Starcraft 2.
It is nice (animations, textures, mission design) but there are some things that really annoy me:
+ Why no formations? This would've been very helpful as some units like to stand INSIDE of each other. Units with long range should stay in the back and the others in front.
+ When you have ~20 units attacking a building then some of them attack and stay right on their place and the other 15 try to get around them to attack the target at the exact same distance... You can't imagine how stupid that looks and how ineffective this is...
+ At least in the single player mode it would have been nice to pause the game and give a queue of stuff to do, as the camera cant zoom out much and you have to jump around on the mini map like crazy to catch up with your units.
+ Selecting units can sometimes be a big pain in the ass.
---
This aren't things that would make the game more  but would give you a bigger control over the masses.
F.e. I had a couple of those RCs with flamethrowers and sent them to my base. The repair units were intelligent enough to come and repair them (nice). But then I send out my units to attack (and I just select my group with RCs!) but the idiotic repair robots follow them outside, though I did never give them the order to be attached to my group :/
Still a very nice game. At the moment it would deserve 8/10 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:08 Post subject: |
|
|
I missed those claims never expected anything innovative from this game, in all honesty innovation doesn't come from big companies, which are only after profit, but smaller ones somewhere in Russia.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| madmax17 wrote: | | ... if it ain't broken don't bloody mess with it. |
+1
Totally agree with u, its a mistake of many game developers now days, they think they need to change smthn...just look at the SC:C, OFP, C&C...
Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D + be quiet! Dark Rock 4 | KFA2 RTX 4080 | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 @3600MHz | Samsung 860 Evo 500GB + 1TB + 10TB WD Blue | Corsair RM750x | LG 27GL83A + LG 27GL850 | Fractal Define R6 | Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Stealth | DeathAdder Chroma
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:13 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm stucked at the mission
| Spoiler: | when zerg infestations try to conquer settlements located at map. Always hordes of zerg attacked me and I don't have even chance to make attack to already infested settlements. |
What's the easiest way to pass this?
~ Thus spoke Citrone ~
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| Citrone wrote: | I'm stucked at the mission
| Spoiler: | when zerg infestations try to conquer settlements located at map. Always hordes of zerg attacked me and I don't have even chance to make attack to already infested settlements. |
What's the easiest way to pass this? |
| Spoiler: | I got the Perdition Turret from upgrading via my Zerg Research. Which prooved to be much useful. Placed 3 at every entrance to the base, plus two bunkers with an MG on the top (also Zerg Research). As the waves grew stronger I placed more Perdition Turrets at the entrances..
Went pretty smoothly and I could easily destroy the infestated areas with the rest of my troops. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| madmax17 wrote: | | I missed those claims never expected anything innovative from this game, in all honesty innovation doesn't come from big companies, which are only after profit, but smaller ones somewhere in Russia. |
And all fail miserably.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:27 Post subject: |
|
|
The Meinhoff mission?
| Spoiler: | I simply used bunkers with a firebat and 2 marines in as defense, 1 or 2 bunkers at each approach. Then I used Marines, Firebats, Marauders and Medics to go around and kill the buildings. No need to only do it at day, these units will make short work of any infested. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 20:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Battle.net is down but everywhere I look it states it is actually up and working fine...
This is the only page I can find online which isn't even related to Blizzard which states which servers are up and down updated every 5 minutes here...
I've run the Starcraft II repair tool and even rebooted my router/modem still can't connect...
What sucks most is I was working on getting an achievement and suddenly I get a message I've lost connection to Battle.net, although everytime I start the game it states it is connecting to the update server but never updates...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mussolinka wrote: | | madmax17 wrote: | | I missed those claims never expected anything innovative from this game, in all honesty innovation doesn't come from big companies, which are only after profit, but smaller ones somewhere in Russia. |
And all fail miserably. |
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/perimeter/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0
Maybe you missed this one  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 4th Aug 2010 21:35 Post subject: |
|
|
I remember FISKER_Q's comment in particular, naming the SP campaign as the most innovative ever. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 126 of 179 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
There was no build up of difficulty.. major design flaw in the campaign IMO.
