Rage
Page 68 of 214 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 67, 68, 69 ... 212, 213, 214  Next
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:17    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
consolitis wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
Those graphics are very impressive for the Xbox version. I don't see the problem.


+ they run at double the framerate of what 99% of other games run. (60 vs 30)

Totally convincing argument. Laughing


I'm not trying to convince anyone, especially not you Laughing
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:18    Post subject:
You can't convince iNatan of anything. He's infallible, remember?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:18    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
What other game looks and runs better?

Oblivion + mods runs constant 60.
Crysis runs 50+ but looks like out of this world still.
Witcher 2 runs 60 for the most part and blows this.
Shit, even Doom 3 looks better with its completely dynamic lighting and high res textures.
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:20    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
Some 360 gameplay:


1080p footage of 720p game. YouTube rocks! Laughing But at least it's not blurred. Smile

 Spoiler:
 


22GB game data FTW!

EDIT: But if it runs @60fps, I'm impressed then. Shocked


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that theyโ€™ll interrupt you when youโ€™re answering a question they asked."


Last edited by Raccoon on Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:24; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:20    Post subject:
What? I haven't seen any of the ones you mentioned run on Xbox.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:22    Post subject:
wygosnik23 wrote:
22GB game data FTW!

Why you so bitter man? Rolling Eyes Hating shit - sucks to be you man!

Laughing

Mister_s wrote:
What? I haven't seen any of the ones you mentioned run on Xbox.

But of course, isn't that the standard for good graphics and performance. Xbox Laughing
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:24    Post subject:
You lost me. How is comparing a youtube vid of a game running on six year old hardware to a fully modded game logical Scratch Head
Back to top
Ke1N




Posts: 2403
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:24    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:

I don't care what anyone says, I'm still looking forward to this in a big way Very Happy

I agree with you on this one.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:24    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
You lost me. How is comparing a youtube vid of a game running on six year old hardware to a fully modded game logical Scratch Head


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:25    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
You lost me. How is comparing a youtube vid of a game running on six year old hardware to a fully modded game logical Scratch Head

Oblivion texture will look better unmodded as well.

Doom + Witcher 2 + Crysis requrie no modding.

I once was lost but now am found? Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:26    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
 Spoiler:
 

Learning from past mistakes? Laughing
Was about to change avatar... Failed Troll Very Happy
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:27    Post subject:
You're still comparing a game on PC to a game on the Xbox. Your comments are a result of that vid showing Xbox gameplay right? I am confused.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:27    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
consolitis wrote:
 Spoiler:
 

Learning from past mistakes? Laughing
Was about to change avatar... Failed Troll Very Happy


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:28    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
You're still comparing a game on PC to a game on the Xbox. Your comments are a result of that vid showing Xbox gameplay right? I am confused.

This is a game coming to PC as well no?
Also, what do you want to bet that Crysis 1 on Xbox and Oblivion on Xbox have better textures? Framerate is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with textures, unless the process of multitexturing is so complex for consoles that it halves the FPS.
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:29    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
wygosnik23 wrote:
22GB game data FTW!

Why you so bitter man? Rolling Eyes Hating shit - sucks to be you man!

Laughing


Hey! It was Sabin, not me!

Anyway, I'm still waiting for this game. The landscapes, clouds and gameplay look amazing.
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:31    Post subject:
Leo, you have no legal right to complain, stfu.


Cool Face

To be honest though, I'm not excited at ALL about this game. What's so revolutionary about it? It's not that every game needs to be revolutionary, but the hype for this game was going through the roof, while it looks totally uninspired and resembles a cheap Borderlands knock-off. Derpmack has gone to shit ever since he got paid by M$ to praise their machine. Instead of writing revolutionary engines, he writes mediocre games for 512 mb of ram consoles. Laughing

Not looking forward to this one at all, looks pretty boring if I'm totally honest.


I think it's the first time I agree with Leo. Laughing
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:34    Post subject:
A revolutionary engine should be able to scale perfectly. We will see how that is handled when the PC version is available. An engine which runs great only on teh best of HW is a shitty engine.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:37    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
A revolutionary engine should be able to scale perfectly. We will see how that is handled when the PC version is available. An engine which runs great only on teh best of HW is a shitty engine.

I agree with you completely. But this should be true the other way around - an engine and game art should not only cater to console shit hardware but also be able to run and look great on the best of HW. Otherwise it is a shitty engine and a shitty looking game.
This engine direction is incapable of looking anything better even on NASA computers, because they need to generate 100GB of game art data. Yeah, amazing design indeed. Rolling Eyes

Neon wrote:
I think it's the first time I agree with Leo. Laughing

Shocked Laughing

More games that look much better- Assassins Creed series. Very Happy


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:39; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:38    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
A revolutionary engine should be able to scale perfectly. We will see how that is handled when the PC version is available. An engine which runs great only on teh best of HW is a shitty engine.


A engine that requires 22 gigabytes of data while providing no explanation, reason nor evidence for producing a better quality image is shit.

@Leo

Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:41    Post subject:
Neon wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
A revolutionary engine should be able to scale perfectly. We will see how that is handled when the PC version is available. An engine which runs great only on teh best of HW is a shitty engine.


A engine that requires 22 gigabytes of data while providing no explanation, reason nor evidence for producing a better quality image is shit.

@Leo



Variation not quality.
Back to top
Immunity




Posts: 5626

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:44    Post subject:
I haven't followed this game at all apart from watching that 9 minute "Jackal Canyon" game-play trailer. Going off of that, it looks to be a 100% Borderlands knock off. Any unique features I should be getting excited about (besides the "revolutionary" *cough* my ass *cough* engine)?


I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
Back to top
trashci




Posts: 922
Location: Izmir, Turkey
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:45    Post subject:
Game looks like a better looking Borderlands. Only difference is that Rage doesn't have a skill system and classes.

I wanted to buy this one... But this much resemblance with the Borderlands has just took me off.

And I must say... I'm fucking bored with all those FPS games out there in the last 3 years. And this one is no different. Just "bang, bang" until its ends. And when it ends, just throw it out of the window.

And fuck that megatexture bullshit. Hell no, im not opening 24 gbs of freespace for this piece of junk.


Back to top
NeHoMaR




Posts: 855
Location: In my house.
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:48    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
this piece of shit
Actually, I want to play "this piece of shit". Maybe because I am the only one in the world not caring about graphics. I started with a monochrome monitor 20 years ago, so everything (about graphics) is impressive for me, even Mario Bros.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:51    Post subject:
NeHoMaR wrote:
iNatan wrote:
this piece of shit
Actually, I want to play "this piece of shit". Maybe because I am the only one in the world not caring about graphics. I started with a monochrome monitor 20 years ago, so everything (about graphics) is impressive for me, even Mario Bros.

That's great, have fun.
Notice that I have not said anything about the gameplay. I don't think it will be good, but in the last few days, I have only spoken about engine choice and game art.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the forum:

[quote="scsa"]BTW this game is awesome and graphics are one of the best![/quote]

.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 1st Oct 2011 23:56    Post subject:
Shame you removed the screenshots, the art style looked really great in them.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Oct 2011 00:05    Post subject:
Everyone can take a look at them on the other thread. I thought it would fix the quote bug.
Back to top
Zed03




Posts: 41

PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Oct 2011 00:35    Post subject:
leaked
Back to top
H4wkeye




Posts: 4699
Location: CTU
PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Oct 2011 00:39    Post subject:
Rage GOLD MASTER STEAM UNLOCKED [Full Rip/FPS/2011]

No crack though Troll Face
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Oct 2011 01:31    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:44; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
H4wkeye




Posts: 4699
Location: CTU
PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Oct 2011 01:34    Post subject:
It doesn't say, but since the title is Unlocked, I suppose so. It's 20.7 gigs.
Back to top
Page 68 of 214 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 67, 68, 69 ... 212, 213, 214  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group