Battlefield 3
Page 391 of 848 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 390, 391, 392 ... 846, 847, 848  Next
Shakabutt




Posts: 1234
Location: Chair
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 09:59    Post subject:
Sigh....im willing to give my Bnet Account with stacraft 2 and anthology for a key for this game....thats all i have except the pants on my ass Sad

Anyone up for it ? Help a poor guy out ?

I can even play it in Mandarin i want it that bad

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
russ80




Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:01    Post subject:
4treyu wrote:
grapper wrote:
Gamereactor Sweden are idiots... not because the score is the lowest so far but because the lack of general quality.


I don't know shit about them but giving 8/10 to Graphics is nothing short of ridiculous.



Should check what they gave MW2. If it's anything short of a 5 they're eating shit for a living.
Back to top
nareg




Posts: 120
Location: Czech Republic
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:02    Post subject:
BF3 Soundtrack
http://goo.gl/376k9

BTW Don't know if repost Smile
Back to top
Sparhawk




Posts: 470

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:04    Post subject:
russ80 wrote:
Littlejacob wrote:
well I rly dont care about reviews.. I only hope that we will be able to turn off bloom and another distracting effects...


Do people even know what bloom is seriously? This game has almost 0 bloom.


sure this game dont have bloom, sunflares etc...


"What a lovely night. It makes me want to have a bite to drink."
Back to top
russ80




Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:07    Post subject:
Yes it has sunflares. Your point being?

It doesn't have bloom except for the obvious places it should be in like : lights reflecting off surfaces (metal for ex creating a glow), dark->light transitions in which case it fades in.

You seriously have no clue what you're talking about do you?


Main PC : I7 12700, MSI Ventus RTX 4090 24gb, Alienware AW3423DW QD-OLED
Laptop : I5 4200H @ 3400mhz boost, GTX 850m 2gb Vram DDR3, 4gb RAM DDR3
Derpsole : Playstation 5 disc edition, Ninty Switcherino
TV+audio: LG CX 65" / Sonos ARC + SL ones + Sonos sub 3
VR Headset: Meta quest 2 airlinked
Back to top
klans




Posts: 53
Location: Latvia
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:09    Post subject:
so, the there are version in "arrr" site, I guess it`s fake right?
Back to top
psikobare




Posts: 764
Location: Cardiff
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:13    Post subject:
rule 1:if you need to ask, then it's fake

rule 2: if you see it on loltorrentz before seeing here, hten it's fake
Back to top
z4p3rr




Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:14    Post subject:
Is there anyone here who activated the game already - for those who preloaded and stuff? Is that Korean vpn stuff working or?
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14860

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:15    Post subject: *****
*****


Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
celltech




Posts: 366

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:17    Post subject:


Last edited by celltech on Fri, 3rd Aug 2018 09:21; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Sparhawk




Posts: 470

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:18    Post subject:
russ80 wrote:
Yes it has sunflares. Your point being?

It doesn't have bloom except for the obvious places it should be in like : lights reflecting off surfaces (metal for ex creating a glow), dark->light transitions in which case it fades in.

You seriously have no clue what you're talking about do you?


my point is, that I wanna be able to turn off that superb non-realistic effects which causes my eyes hurts alot... thats all....


"What a lovely night. It makes me want to have a bite to drink."
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:22    Post subject:
GameTrailers really messed up at one point in the review, they said that the water vehicles were omitted, while there was a boat JUST BEHIND HIM (on the map) while he was saying that

And the usual comments from underneath the video, sweet mother of Thor:

Quote:
5 hour campaign? No thanks, I'll get MW3. 8 hour campaign, more maps, CUSTOM classes, it's a no brainer really. Maybe I'll buy this and trade it in towards MW3.
Back to top
Ragtag




Posts: 284

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:24    Post subject:
Neon wrote:
GameTrailers really messed up at one point in the review, they said that the water vehicles were omitted, while there was a boat JUST BEHIND HIM (on the map) while he was saying that

And the usual comments from underneath the video, sweet mother of Thor:

Quote:
5 hour campaign? No thanks, I'll get MW3. 8 hour campaign, more maps, CUSTOM classes, it's a no brainer really. Maybe I'll buy this and trade it in towards MW3.
'

He says that boats are only in the console version which the review is based on.
Back to top
ZezoS




Posts: 1937

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:24    Post subject:
Neon wrote:
GameTrailers really messed up at one point in the review, they said that the water vehicles were omitted, while there was a boat JUST BEHIND HIM (on the map) while he was saying that

And the usual comments from underneath the video, sweet mother of Thor:

Quote:
5 hour campaign? No thanks, I'll get MW3. 8 hour campaign, more maps, CUSTOM classes, it's a no brainer really. Maybe I'll buy this and trade it in towards MW3.

wtf? 8 hour campaing? did he left the console with MW2 turned on while he was sleeping or something? Laughing
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23142

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:25    Post subject:
Ragtag wrote:

He says that boats are only in the console version which the review is based on.


Reaction
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:29    Post subject:
Ragtag wrote:
Neon wrote:
GameTrailers really messed up at one point in the review, they said that the water vehicles were omitted, while there was a boat JUST BEHIND HIM (on the map) while he was saying that

And the usual comments from underneath the video, sweet mother of Thor:

Quote:
5 hour campaign? No thanks, I'll get MW3. 8 hour campaign, more maps, CUSTOM classes, it's a no brainer really. Maybe I'll buy this and trade it in towards MW3.
'

He says that boats are only in the console version which the review is based on.


The review is based on the PC version, did you even watch it?

It even says "PC REVIEW" in the title.

And the boat was right behind him, he's just a dumbass.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:31    Post subject:
pretty lame how they're basically like.. yeah it's all too familiar.. when somehow when CoD does the same shit again and again it's AWESOME


Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
Back to top
ZezoS




Posts: 1937

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:33    Post subject:
russ80 wrote:
4treyu wrote:
grapper wrote:
Gamereactor Sweden are idiots... not because the score is the lowest so far but because the lack of general quality.


I don't know shit about them but giving 8/10 to Graphics is nothing short of ridiculous.



Should check what they gave MW2. If it's anything short of a 5 they're eating shit for a living.

They gave a 9 for Black Ops graphics Reaction

http://www.gamereactor.se/recensioner/24978/Call+of+Duty%3A+Black+Ops/
Back to top
grapper




Posts: 877
Location: Nuked
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:33    Post subject:
I like the part in the Gametrailer review where they state that it's more open than most shooter campaigns today and say it can be both good and bad. The bad is because "death can come from just about any direction from any time". In real life I hope armies/factions agree that they have clear front lines so soldiers don't have to worry about these kind of things. lol wut
Back to top
Shrako




Posts: 182

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:37    Post subject:
Well, sadly it is a complete piece of shit. Don't get me wrong, MW3 is a piece of shit.
Even Caspian Border never felt like a proper Battlefield map. It still felt like a Bad Company game which is as bad as CoD is.


AMD FX8350 @ 4.8 GHz/4x4GB Corsair Vengeance/HIS 7970
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:41    Post subject:
russ80 wrote:
It doesn't have bloom except for the obvious places it should be in like : lights reflecting off surfaces (metal for ex creating a glow), dark->light transitions in which case it fades in.


Yeah.... Obviously it would look like this

 Spoiler:
 


Reaction

(And yes, this is on low setting, I was trying all possible settings, config etc. to decrease contrast, turn off color tint, turn off bloom. Obviously people at DICE thought it would be imbalanced if we had option to turn these and other distractions off, they shouldn't make them in the first place.)
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:48    Post subject:
Shrako wrote:
Well, sadly it is a complete piece of shit. Don't get me wrong, MW3 is a piece of shit.
Even Caspian Border never felt like a proper Battlefield map. It still felt like a Bad Company game which is as bad as CoD is.


Back to top
RobertHammer




Posts: 333

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:51    Post subject:
Shrako wrote:
Well, sadly it is a complete piece of shit. Don't get me wrong, MW3 is a piece of shit.
Even Caspian Border never felt like a proper Battlefield map. It still felt like a Bad Company game which is as bad as CoD is.


He is right ,but if you compare with BF2 gameplay etc

If you liked BC2 , then you will like BF3 too - because basicly it is BC3 lol
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:53    Post subject:
I wouldn't say Caspian border played like CoD, not at all. However it has shifted the gameplay a lot closer to MoH/CoD style. Although it was open, the real playable area was quitre tight (even more so for 64 players) and flags are clustered, as opposed to previous (true) Battlefields where capture points were scattered all around map. The distance between the capture points often created that tension that if you'd get killed, you'll have to walk/drive some time back there. In BF3 you don't even need to care whether you die, only punishment you and your team get from your death is possible loss of ticket. Also in previous battlefield the distances allowed for better team play. You shout for pick up and friendly heli/jeep picks you up because you are in middle of nowhere after your airplane crashed, etc. There were lot of similar great moments in battlefield that won't return with BF3 which is a shame, really.


Last edited by tolanri on Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:58; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Casus




Posts: 4429

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:53    Post subject:
I guess the beta had a lot of visual stuff disabled? Because while I wouldn't call it bad looking, it most certainly wasn't anything special where the visuals are concerned. More like "middling".
Back to top
grapper




Posts: 877
Location: Nuked
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:56    Post subject:
Casus wrote:
I guess the beta had a lot of visual stuff disabled? Because while I wouldn't call it bad looking, it most certainly wasn't anything special where the visuals are concerned. More like "middling".

Then you didn't play maxed out? How anyone can write above after having played caspian maxed out confuses the hell out of me. I was awed by the beauty of that map, especially the forest parts.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 10:58    Post subject:
people who still compare bf3 to bc2 either :

didnt play bf1942/bf2/bf:v/bf2142

and/or

only played Metro Rush and CoD Mw1/2/BO
Back to top
Sparhawk




Posts: 470

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 11:00    Post subject:
grapper wrote:
Casus wrote:
I guess the beta had a lot of visual stuff disabled? Because while I wouldn't call it bad looking, it most certainly wasn't anything special where the visuals are concerned. More like "middling".

Then you didn't play max. How anyone can write above after having played caspian maxed out confuses the hell out of me. I was awed by the beauty of that map, especially the forest parts.


well graphics looks fine, but if they wanted graphics to be realistic, they fail...


"What a lovely night. It makes me want to have a bite to drink."
Back to top
Casus




Posts: 4429

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 11:02    Post subject:
grapper wrote:
Casus wrote:
I guess the beta had a lot of visual stuff disabled? Because while I wouldn't call it bad looking, it most certainly wasn't anything special where the visuals are concerned. More like "middling".

Then you didn't play maxed out? How anyone can write above after having played caspian maxed out confuses the hell out of me. I was awed by the beauty of that map, especially the forest parts.


I didn't play on Caspian, which might be the reason Wink

Yes, I tried max settings - and it didn't make much of a difference (ran like crap too). This was on the "metro-station" map whatever that was called.
Back to top
Shrako




Posts: 182

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2011 11:03    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
people who still compare bf3 to bc2 either :

didnt play bf1942/bf2/bf:v/bf2142

and/or

only played Metro Rush and CoD Mw1/2/BO


Actually, the problem is that I played bf1942/bf:v/bf2 and loved them. When I tried BC2 I hated it and to me BF3 feels closer to BC2 than to older games.
Back to top
Page 391 of 848 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 390, 391, 392 ... 846, 847, 848  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group