| Page 1 of 2 |
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
 Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 21:49 Post subject: We have come a long way in the graphics aint we... |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 21:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Now imagine if there were no console hurrdurr.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 21:59 Post subject: |
|
|
..BF3 wouldn't look as good because EA wouldn't be willing to invest so much money for the limited market of just 1 platform.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:02 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Except you can't see shit in the last pic since it's riddled with AWESOME GRAFIXX.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:14 Post subject: |
|
|
See, the last screenshot is the ONLY one that DOES look authentic with the flare and dust/particles, since you're sitting underneath a canopy scratched and damaged by shrapnel/weapons fire, as well as the canopy itself refracting the light. It's the REST of the game where that shit annoys the piss out of me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Graphics can be a lot better. So there is still long way to go.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | See, the last screenshot is the ONLY one that DOES look authentic with the flare and dust/particles, since you're sitting underneath a canopy scratched and damaged by shrapnel/weapons fire, as well as the canopy itself refracting the light. It's the REST of the game where that shit annoys the piss out of me. |
The lens flares and spots are still camera related and would not appear to a naked eye, so still it is not "good".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Well this is before the puts on the glass. When she does, she has the targeting HUD, which is not seen here.
Also, lens flare is not just a term, it is a technical limitation of lens systems. The reflected and refracted light would still appear, but your eyes would not see the geometrical shapes emulated by the game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:39; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 22:46 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | Well this is before the puts on the glass. When she does, she has the targeting HUD, which is not seen here.
|
The HUD doesn't appear automatically, she had to turn it on, if I remember correctly.
| Quote: |
Also, lens flare is not just a term, it is a technical limitation of lens systems. The reflected and refracted light would still appear, but your eyes would not see the geometrical shapes emulated by the game. |
No, I was using the phrase as a term, since it's the one most people recognise. What I'm really talking about most the time is light refraction, which is very similar to the typical "lens flare" we see in BF3 and pretty much anything made by J.J.Abrams. I wasn't convinced about the shapes though, since I'm pretty sure I remember seeing them with my naked eye when light refracts through a window, for example.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 23:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| jaapie18 wrote: | | Graphics can be a lot better. So there is still long way to go. |
say no more   |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 23:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| garus wrote: | | War never changes. |
according to snake thats wrong.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 23:18 Post subject: |
|
|
at least the BF2 screenshot is not at max settings..... no foilage either in BFV. Very picky screenshot selection.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:00 Post subject: |
|
|
all these 'awesome' graphics I just find myself finding ways to turn them off, I hate anything blur, bloom and the new fxaa or whatever just adds more blur. I hate how graphics have evolved into everything shiny and blurry.
The only graphics that impress me are animations,textures and shadows. I could give a fuck less about the rest.
Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.8 // 4GB DDR3 // GTX 285
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 04:45; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| HunterHare wrote: | all these 'awesome' graphics I just find myself finding ways to turn them off, I hate anything blur, bloom and the new fxaa or whatever just adds more blur. I hate how graphics have evolved into everything shiny and blurry.
The only graphics that impress me are animations,textures and shadows. I could give a fuck less about the rest. |
Same. And ironically, shadows and textures are usually pretty poor no matter how 'graphically advanced' the game. I think that's the point with all the shininess and blur though; hiding the low quality of the art assets.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:14 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:16 Post subject: |
|
|
The graphics look good for their time in most games , BF3 got deleted after the russian guy mission , i thought it was horrible even at 1680x1050 all on ultra and the gameplay was shite , stupid cue points for retards, boring.
Today it is my turn to be AN knobhead
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:22 Post subject: |
|
|
The GFX are very very good but it can sometimes get overwhelming,in the forest section i didnt know where the hell to look anymore
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 27th Oct 2011 00:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 04:45; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 30th Oct 2011 00:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Raap wrote: | | I think that's the point with all the shininess and blur though; hiding the low quality of the art assets. |
no... look at a hollywood movie, it's about being 'cinematic' & mimicing cameras to look cool, not our eyes
the obvious example is kane & lynch 2, shakey cam + bright lights do a weird vertical lens flare + flicker, even has video compression artifacts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
| Posted: Sun, 30th Oct 2011 01:15 Post subject: |
|
|
And the console framerates are perfect for cinematic!
kogel mogel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Sun, 30th Oct 2011 01:17 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:38; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
| Posted: Sun, 30th Oct 2011 02:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Dont understimate the snake. the sioux people fear them! Though some of them also like pulling peoples ears in harsh winter and talk to their forehead  Spoiler: | |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
The scratches on the canopy also look realistic. The dust? Egh, still looks like shite.. though I was more referring to the particles itself, since the character you play is wearing a helmet with a piece of perspex (glass. perhaps?) she slides down over her face.
leaving all the maps designed exactly as they were
