GTA San Andreas
Page 28 of 34 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 27, 28, 29 ... 32, 33, 34  Next
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 05:49    Post subject:
Dude, dont skip it because of the "bad" graphics, the gameplay is fricking awesome! You will miss out on a AAA game if you skip it.
Back to top
Dandos




Posts: 276

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 05:56    Post subject:
http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/gta4/media.html

therez alotta PS2 gameply vidz on gamespot just stream them
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14760

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 06:42    Post subject:
The game looks perfect, but this is just a low quality video, u cant blame the game from bad video quality. U should look at more high res video's, then u see it looks great.


PC: Yes. Console: No.
Back to top
scrub6969




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 06:58    Post subject:
YES there is higher res textures, greater view distance, and better character models! Just read any PC preview all they'll all state that!

"And, of course, it probably goes without saying that the PC version of San Andreas will be the best from a technical and graphical standpoint. You can expect to see soft shadows on the character models that lengthen and shorten with the time of day, in addition to a much improved draw distance"

"Rockstar North traditionally creates all its in-game assets using high-resolution textures and character models that end up getting scaled down to fit on consoles, like the PS2. The original high-resolution art will appear in full force in the PC version of San Andreas in the form of much clearer light reflections on much-more-detailed cars, as well as much-more-detailed characters and environments. Subtle nuances, like graffiti art in the slums and tattoos on your character's skin (and logos on your character's clothing), will be much more clearly visible. It's safe to say that as good as San Andreas looked on the PS2, the PC version will look much better in just about every respect"

-gamespot
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/gta4/preview_6122561.html
Back to top
FakeBitchKillah.inc




Posts: 2378

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 07:52    Post subject:
trollkopf wrote:
this looks really bad, i will skip this game.





Back to top
wrathamon




Posts: 908

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 08:13    Post subject:
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 08:23    Post subject:
^ already posted
Back to top
Dandos




Posts: 276

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:23    Post subject:
wow i cant believe ppl are even thinking about not playing this FUCKING AWESOME GAME!!!!
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:24    Post subject:
their loss Cool
what a month this is going to be, now let the rain pour down Very Happy
Back to top
Devilkin




Posts: 13

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:31    Post subject:
I just hope I won't have to buy it Smile
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13300

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:33    Post subject:
Videos and aren't worth shit! wait til you get to play it and then you see nice graphics.
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:47    Post subject:
Devilkin wrote:
I just hope I won't have to buy it Smile


This game is worth the money.
Good games deserves to get money, like this one = GTA 4
Back to top
Devilkin




Posts: 13

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:02    Post subject:
Yeah, you're right. Though I haven't tried it yet, I'm confident I'll love it, just like VC Very Happy
Back to top
kukhen




Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:07    Post subject:
crap, TB have more replies on the gta SA thread now :S
Back to top
wildwing
Banned



Posts: 639

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:11    Post subject:
kukhen wrote:
crap, TB have more replies on the gta SA thread now :S

and ?
its fkng offtopic
:> Mad
Back to top
kolor




Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:51    Post subject:
god damn, TB?
are u kiddin, fkin leet p2p leecher
Back to top
NoFate




Posts: 69

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:01    Post subject:
what is tb ?
Back to top
jonels
Banned



Posts: 1038

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:02    Post subject:
whats TB ?


I looked up "gormless" in the dictionary, it said "without gorm" .... so i looked up "gorm" but it wasn't there ????
Back to top
Prince2k




Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:03    Post subject:
NoFate wrote:
what is tb ?

My guess it's TorrentBytes.
But who cares about it? Even isonews got more post in GTA:SA thread Laughing
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:06    Post subject:
Sublime wrote:
feyenoord4ever wrote:
Baleur wrote:
[

Excuse me mister lutzifer but.. LMAO Twisted Evil Razz

Oh man, we are all bums with no life, sitting here refreshing the bookmarked nforce threads, wishing and praying to dear god that someone has posted something, because we have no real social life to get our daily dose of human contact Rolling Eyes Very Happy Very Happy Laughing


lol ey... Speak for yourself Wink


i agree.... bookmarked threads Shocked don't think ive ever done that.


hehehehe
I guess we are all nerds around here. I never intended to mean that people here, have no social life, as at least i can say i have. I sometimes do the thread refresh mambo though, when a game is due to be released, so that makes me a bigger nerd i suppose... =)

I wonder how much pages this thread will be when the game release is finally out. Very Happy
Back to top
vurt




Posts: 13585
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:07    Post subject:
madnessnaab wrote:
Videos and aren't worth shit! wait til you get to play it and then you see nice graphics.


Yeah i think it's gonna be pretty sweet. Ragdol physiscs will be a nice addition (really missed that in Vice City), and for PC and xbox a new realtime lightning engine that reacts to the day/night cycles.. The PC previews so far have been very positive about the improved textures and new lightning engine. Gameplay, of course, will be awesome.
Back to top
jonels
Banned



Posts: 1038

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:18    Post subject:
That video looks so crap, the frame rate is shocking. I really hope its a case of the video card having too high setting for what it is capable of, or this is going to my biggest dissapointment of the year, I been waiting @8 months for a graphics update from the PS2 version.....but the PS2 version looks way better than what i just saw in that vid by just having a much better frame rate and its not that fantastic on the PS2 ... but that game must of been running @10 fps.

.....i'm quite worried now


Last edited by jonels on Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:24; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13300

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:21    Post subject:
jonels wrote:
That video looks so crap, the frame rate is shocking. I really hope its a case of the video card having too high setting for what it is capable of, or this is going to my biggest dissapointment of the year, I been waiting @8 months for a graphics update from the PS2 version.....but the PS2 version looks way better than what i just saw in that vid by just having a much better frame rate and its not that fantastic on the PS2 ... but that vid must of been running @10 fps.

.....i'm quite worried now



hahahaha : D
you are worried about a video
Back to top
jonels
Banned



Posts: 1038

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:28    Post subject:
madnessnaab wrote:


hahahaha : D
you are worried about a video


Yes but that was from a proffesional source, a big games magazine. Surely they have a decent PC and know how to set up a graphics card ?

If it is that they don't know how to setup the graphics settings, then its really worrying generally that they review games at all.
Back to top
wrathamon




Posts: 908

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:43    Post subject:
I have on many occasions noted the shit graphics of the screenshots of games in Gamespot. Actually quite a few occasions.
It leads me to the conclusion that they dont review their games on decent machines.
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13300

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:45    Post subject:
obiously the video was heavily compressed, the reduce the enourmous filesize..
have you seen the full 1024x resolution 600mb movie ? I haven't...
Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:46    Post subject:
I don't care about this graphics talk, i know the game will look a fuck load better on the screen rather than some pictures
Back to top
wrathamon




Posts: 908

PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:49    Post subject:
actually the game's graphics would be mediocre at best compared to other titles out. It will obviously be better then VC but nothing special. It certainly wouldnt take advantage of the high-end GPUs.
Back to top
ad4m




Posts: 339
Location: Location: Location: Location: Teh INTERNETS !
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:51    Post subject:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/papparazzi/sa_countdown_us.swf Very Happy

and graphics is not the most important thing, it would be awesome even with a bit improved graphics from vice city.

and for fu*k sake, this game is not about graphics !! Wink


Back to top
RubberChicken




Posts: 1267
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:52    Post subject:
the GTA3 engine is limited though.
the gameplay is everything in the GTA series, graphics should never come first imo, gameplay should.
Back to top
Page 28 of 34 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 27, 28, 29 ... 32, 33, 34  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group