Page 28 of 34 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 05:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
Dude, dont skip it because of the "bad" graphics, the gameplay is fricking awesome! You will miss out on a AAA game if you skip it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 06:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
The game looks perfect, but this is just a low quality video, u cant blame the game from bad video quality. U should look at more high res video's, then u see it looks great.
PC: Yes. Console: No.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 06:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
YES there is higher res textures, greater view distance, and better character models! Just read any PC preview all they'll all state that!
"And, of course, it probably goes without saying that the PC version of San Andreas will be the best from a technical and graphical standpoint. You can expect to see soft shadows on the character models that lengthen and shorten with the time of day, in addition to a much improved draw distance"
"Rockstar North traditionally creates all its in-game assets using high-resolution textures and character models that end up getting scaled down to fit on consoles, like the PS2. The original high-resolution art will appear in full force in the PC version of San Andreas in the form of much clearer light reflections on much-more-detailed cars, as well as much-more-detailed characters and environments. Subtle nuances, like graffiti art in the slums and tattoos on your character's skin (and logos on your character's clothing), will be much more clearly visible. It's safe to say that as good as San Andreas looked on the PS2, the PC version will look much better in just about every respect"
-gamespot
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/gta4/preview_6122561.html
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 07:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
trollkopf wrote: | this looks really bad, i will skip this game. |

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 08:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 08:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
wow i cant believe ppl are even thinking about not playing this FUCKING AWESOME GAME!!!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 09:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
Videos and aren't worth shit! wait til you get to play it and then you see nice graphics.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
crap, TB have more replies on the gta SA thread now :S
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 10:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
god damn, TB?
are u kiddin, fkin leet p2p leecher
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:01 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
whats TB ?
I looked up "gormless" in the dictionary, it said "without gorm" .... so i looked up "gorm" but it wasn't there ????
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:06 Post subject: |
|
 |
Sublime wrote: | feyenoord4ever wrote: | Baleur wrote: | [
Excuse me mister lutzifer but.. LMAO
Oh man, we are all bums with no life, sitting here refreshing the bookmarked nforce threads, wishing and praying to dear god that someone has posted something, because we have no real social life to get our daily dose of human contact  |
lol ey... Speak for yourself  |
i agree.... bookmarked threads don't think ive ever done that. |
hehehehe
I guess we are all nerds around here. I never intended to mean that people here, have no social life, as at least i can say i have. I sometimes do the thread refresh mambo though, when a game is due to be released, so that makes me a bigger nerd i suppose... =)
I wonder how much pages this thread will be when the game release is finally out. 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vurt
Posts: 13585
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
madnessnaab wrote: | Videos and aren't worth shit! wait til you get to play it and then you see nice graphics. |
Yeah i think it's gonna be pretty sweet. Ragdol physiscs will be a nice addition (really missed that in Vice City), and for PC and xbox a new realtime lightning engine that reacts to the day/night cycles.. The PC previews so far have been very positive about the improved textures and new lightning engine. Gameplay, of course, will be awesome.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
That video looks so crap, the frame rate is shocking. I really hope its a case of the video card having too high setting for what it is capable of, or this is going to my biggest dissapointment of the year, I been waiting @8 months for a graphics update from the PS2 version.....but the PS2 version looks way better than what i just saw in that vid by just having a much better frame rate and its not that fantastic on the PS2 ... but that game must of been running @10 fps.
.....i'm quite worried now
Last edited by jonels on Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:24; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
jonels wrote: | That video looks so crap, the frame rate is shocking. I really hope its a case of the video card having too high setting for what it is capable of, or this is going to my biggest dissapointment of the year, I been waiting @8 months for a graphics update from the PS2 version.....but the PS2 version looks way better than what i just saw in that vid by just having a much better frame rate and its not that fantastic on the PS2 ... but that vid must of been running @10 fps.
.....i'm quite worried now |
hahahaha : D
you are worried about a video
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
madnessnaab wrote: |
hahahaha : D
you are worried about a video |
Yes but that was from a proffesional source, a big games magazine. Surely they have a decent PC and know how to set up a graphics card ?
If it is that they don't know how to setup the graphics settings, then its really worrying generally that they review games at all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
I have on many occasions noted the shit graphics of the screenshots of games in Gamespot. Actually quite a few occasions.
It leads me to the conclusion that they dont review their games on decent machines.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
obiously the video was heavily compressed, the reduce the enourmous filesize..
have you seen the full 1024x resolution 600mb movie ? I haven't...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
I don't care about this graphics talk, i know the game will look a fuck load better on the screen rather than some pictures
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
actually the game's graphics would be mediocre at best compared to other titles out. It will obviously be better then VC but nothing special. It certainly wouldnt take advantage of the high-end GPUs.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ad4m
Posts: 339
Location: Location: Location: Location: Teh INTERNETS !
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 2nd Jun 2005 11:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
the GTA3 engine is limited though.
the gameplay is everything in the GTA series, graphics should never come first imo, gameplay should.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 28 of 34 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |