|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
Posted: Thu, 10th Nov 2011 03:48 Post subject: Just bought a Dell UltraSharp U2312HM |
|
 |
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=19&l=en&sku=320-2807
Yep it was on sale at 219,99$ and i just couldn't resist. I was looking for a budget monitor in the 150$-180 range to go with my new system and was torn between a 23" Samsung and a 24" LG mode; until...i saw the Dell reduced by 100$ on their site. I decided to pull the trigger even though it was a bit over my budget.
I've heard good things about the U2311H so i bought this updated model mostly out of reputation of it's predecessor but i'm worried a bit about the 8ms response time. I've always had 5ms and 2ms monitors TN panels so i wonder if making the jump to e-IPS and 8ms will be noticeable ?
Any of you folks have this (or the U23 or 24" model) monitor ?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Thu, 10th Nov 2011 16:27 Post subject: Re: Just bought a Dell UltraSharp U2312HM |
|
 |
S.S.S wrote: | I've heard good things about the U2311H so i bought this updated model mostly out of reputation of it's predecessor but i'm worried a bit about the 8ms response time. I've always had 5ms and 2ms monitors TN panels so i wonder if making the jump to e-IPS and 8ms will be noticeable ? |
8ms on IPS works differently than it does on TN.
I've run some input lag tests on my two monitors: Eizo FS2332 (IPS, 6ms) and LG W2253V (TN, 2ms). No difference, both less than 1 frame. I also didn't notice any ghosting on my Eizo so far.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 18th Nov 2011 08:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
I'm looking at Dell monitor U2412M but that e-IPS is the issue. I mean, it still is IPS and is kicking ass the TN panel, but it still is e - economic...
The 'real' IPS panels (h, p) are (on the reviews) better. Way better than e-IPS, but the cost is also significantly higher :\
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson chiv wrote: | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|