Diablo 3
Page 312 of 512 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 311, 312, 313 ... 510, 511, 512  Next
speedgear




Posts: 2697
Location: portugal
PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 15:01    Post subject:
cyclonefr wrote:
This mouse has a right button, you just don't see it, but if you press on the right, it will right click. Also, nobody forces you to use an Apple mouse you know, any PC mouse works on Mac.

Finally, Mac do have quad cores, and newest Mac CoreI5 and I7...

Funny that these usual stereotypes on Macs keep going...

Kurosaki wrote:
wait, I just noticed that diablo 3 is also available for Mac's.... how the fuck are they playing the game on a core2duo processor, or do they already have quad cores Cool Face ? ...and how does ist work with only 1 mouse-button? Very Happy:





Back to top
Silvayn




Posts: 71
Location: Slovakia
PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 16:00    Post subject:
Just out of academic curiosity - is Diablo III crackable? Does it require full server emulation (similar to Ubisoft's DRM)?
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 16:07    Post subject:
Silvayn wrote:
Just out of academic curiosity - is Diablo III crackable? Does it require full server emulation (similar to Ubisoft's DRM)?


No... it requires full server emulation similar to an emulated MMO server.


1 stripe purple belt in JiuJitsu (good grief this takes FOREVER hahah)
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 17:05    Post subject:
my octupus wd :
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14491
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 17:10    Post subject:


liulz


Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 17:13    Post subject:
besthijacker wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETdZXzmmcrk&feature=player_embedded

liulz


That's fucking great Very Happy
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 18:30    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
besthijacker wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETdZXzmmcrk&feature=player_embedded

liulz


That's fucking great Very Happy


good luck getting to 1.000.000 damage reflect on inferno Very Happy
Back to top
dakiller




Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 19:55    Post subject:
hmmm

just found out that battlenet passwords are case insensitive........
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5152409863?page=1

that is..... wow...just wow

still love the game and after playing the starter like 30 times over...will be purchasing next week , no matter how much i have bitched about it Wink
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:03    Post subject:
you just found that ?
that is the situation from wow beta.
countless threads about it.
no ideea why they let it stay that way.
Back to top
dakiller




Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:09    Post subject:
frogster wrote:
you just found that ?
that is the situation from wow beta.
countless threads about it.
no ideea why they let it stay that way.


last time i used battlenet before last week was years ago for D2, no idea if that acct even exists so ..nope i did not know that, and it is retarded esp with all the folks crying hack
Back to top
Pl@tinum




Posts: 1036

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:15    Post subject:
dakiller wrote:
hmmm

just found out that battlenet passwords are case insensitive........
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5152409863?page=1

that is..... wow...just wow

still love the game and after playing the starter like 30 times over...will be purchasing next week , no matter how much i have bitched about it Wink


It really doesn't matter. I highly doubt anyone is getting "hacked" from password brute force. It's the usual phishing, key-logging and the lot.
Back to top
dakiller




Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:19    Post subject:
Pl@tinum wrote:
dakiller wrote:
hmmm

just found out that battlenet passwords are case insensitive........
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5152409863?page=1

that is..... wow...just wow

still love the game and after playing the starter like 30 times over...will be purchasing next week , no matter how much i have bitched about it Wink


It really doesn't matter. I highly doubt anyone is getting "hacked" from password brute force. It's the usual phishing, key-logging and the lot.


seems likely agreed, but i do find it a curious practice, even if just for the sake of appearances
Back to top
Raap




Posts: 956

PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:20    Post subject:
Yeah, Blizzard would probably notice if someone did a brute force attempt. Hopefully.

It's kinda strange how many odd decisions they've made though. No case sensitive passwords, no offline mode for friends list, no hiding profile, recent played list, etc. Privacy and security doesn't exactly seem to factor very high with them.
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9467
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 25th May 2012 20:44    Post subject:
dakiller wrote:
Pl@tinum wrote:
dakiller wrote:
hmmm

just found out that battlenet passwords are case insensitive........
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5152409863?page=1

that is..... wow...just wow

still love the game and after playing the starter like 30 times over...will be purchasing next week , no matter how much i have bitched about it Wink


It really doesn't matter. I highly doubt anyone is getting "hacked" from password brute force. It's the usual phishing, key-logging and the lot.


seems likely agreed, but i do find it a curious practice, even if just for the sake of appearances


I love how Blizzard reacted to that with big fuck you, sulk and closing of the thread. LOL.
Back to top
Smikis.




Posts: 1994

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 01:07    Post subject:
VonMisk wrote:
dakiller wrote:
Pl@tinum wrote:


It really doesn't matter. I highly doubt anyone is getting "hacked" from password brute force. It's the usual phishing, key-logging and the lot.


seems likely agreed, but i do find it a curious practice, even if just for the sake of appearances


I love how Blizzard reacted to that with big fuck you, sulk and closing of the thread. LOL.

because you never played wow to know just how many scamming attempts are done daily, i would say its in millions.. dailly, and battlenet was never breached. and if it was would be far more than couple hundred people whining
Back to top
crossmr




Posts: 2966
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 02:32    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
crossmr wrote:
bringiton wrote:
GT Review:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/review-hd-diablo-iii/730503

Can't really say I disagree with them. Sure, they only mentioned the technical problems a bit at the end, but overall their review pretty much resembles my opinion.


They gave one of the biggest issues of the game a sentence or two and that's it.
It's what we call glossing over.


whats the biggest issue ?


The technical issues. The fact that single player is online only and what that's done to the game. Lag, broken servers, constant maintenance and unplayable games, crappy save points that are causing people to have to redo huge parts of the game when one of the other issues crops up.


intel ultra 7 265k, 64gb ram, 3070
Back to top
dog-god




Posts: 524

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 03:49    Post subject:
This game reminds me of the writings of Douglas Adams

"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9467
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 08:49    Post subject:
Smikis. wrote:
VonMisk wrote:
dakiller wrote:


seems likely agreed, but i do find it a curious practice, even if just for the sake of appearances


I love how Blizzard reacted to that with big fuck you, sulk and closing of the thread. LOL.

because you never played wow to know just how many scamming attempts are done daily, i would say its in millions.. dailly, and battlenet was never breached. and if it was would be far more than couple hundred people whining


Actually I played WOW but that's not important. The important thing is that they should change the password system and not say that it's alright the way it is. No matter how many attemps to breach it there is or was. But that's american company they don't care about privacy Wink
Back to top
Smikis.




Posts: 1994

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 13:06    Post subject:
VonMisk wrote:
Smikis. wrote:
VonMisk wrote:


I love how Blizzard reacted to that with big fuck you, sulk and closing of the thread. LOL.

because you never played wow to know just how many scamming attempts are done daily, i would say its in millions.. dailly, and battlenet was never breached. and if it was would be far more than couple hundred people whining


Actually I played WOW but that's not important. The important thing is that they should change the password system and not say that it's alright the way it is. No matter how many attemps to breach it there is or was. But that's american company they don't care about privacy Wink

what does password system change would actually change? so instead iamretard random retard will enter IamRetarD into scamming site? that would change absolutely nothing
Back to top
daniggo




Posts: 40

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 13:48    Post subject:
If you use, to make things easy, a password, that has only three letters and there is no difference between lowercase and uppercase letters, then you have 36 different symbols (a-z, 0-9). So, for a password length of 3, there are 36*36*36 = 46656 possible combinations.
If you use lowercase and uppercase letters, there are 62*62*62 = 238328 possible combination, 5 times as many and therefore much more secure.
If you take passwords of length 8, the passwords with lower- and uppercase give 18 times the number of possible combinations than if only lowercase would be taken into account.
So they are siginificantly lowering security of their system, even though taking uppcase letters into account wouldn't be any more work for them. It's complete madness.
This doesn't protect against phising, but it still is a lot more security you get "for free", so it's stupid to only use lowercase letters.
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 13:57    Post subject:
majority of hacked accounts are hacked by dictionary password list, not chars combination.
is a waste of time.
Back to top
daniggo




Posts: 40

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 14:02    Post subject:
But this also significantly increases security against dictionary attacks, because they also have to consider words with uppercase letters. If you want to take into account, that maybe the user you are trying to hack starts his password with an uppercase letter, then you will have to check twice as many words from the dictionary, every word once in lowercase and once starting with an uppercase letter.
And - if you use a password, that you might find in a dictionary, but write it with an uppercase letter somewhere in between, like aniMal, you would be much safer against dictionary attacks - but Blizzard will just convert your password to animal and remove the added security - and for no logical reason whatsoever except lazyness.
Back to top
Yondaime
VIP Member



Posts: 11741

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 14:04    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 15:42; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 14:05    Post subject:
I doubt they use dictionary attacks. It's too much time consuming, when they can go and ask the users for their password and they will willingly give it to them Smile


Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.6 GHz | Asus Z170 Pro Gaming | Corsair Vengenace LPX 16GB DDR4 3200 MHz | MSI GeForce GTX 1080 FE | Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 250 GB | EVGA SuperNOVA 750 G2 | Fractal Design Define R5 | Noctua NH-D14


Last edited by tolanri on Sat, 26th May 2012 14:52; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Bendi




Posts: 3395

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 14:23    Post subject:
Yup, it's mostly Mitnick-style "hacking": assuming (correctly) that most users are idiots with no computer knowledge or just common sense.
Back to top
dakiller




Posts: 359

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 15:27    Post subject:
ok
so i mention that battlenet PW's are case insensitive
and the whole "why should blizz do anything diff, users are morons" circle starts again

sigh

anyone with even half a brain knows that is a bad security policy....
but ok ok, i'm sorry, Blizzard is immaculate lol Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 15:40    Post subject:
Code:
This is actually consistent with all of our Blizzard games. Try it in WoW and SC2 :)

Code:
Please leave discussions like this to the General Discussion forums. I'm not going to keep posting on threads if my answer to someone's bug report is a huge discussion about something that isn't a bug.
isn't a bug Y U No???? Mind Is Full Of Fuck Rage


Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 16:06    Post subject:
dakiller wrote:
ok
so i mention that battlenet PW's are case insensitive
and the whole "why should blizz do anything diff, users are morons" circle starts again

sigh

anyone with even half a brain knows that is a bad security policy....
but ok ok, i'm sorry, Blizzard is immaculate lol Rolling Eyes


Of course they could improve on the password requirements, but would that fix the problem with technically inept people / people without common sense getting hacked?


Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.6 GHz | Asus Z170 Pro Gaming | Corsair Vengenace LPX 16GB DDR4 3200 MHz | MSI GeForce GTX 1080 FE | Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 250 GB | EVGA SuperNOVA 750 G2 | Fractal Design Define R5 | Noctua NH-D14
Back to top
dakiller




Posts: 359

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 16:07    Post subject:
tolanri wrote:
dakiller wrote:
ok
so i mention that battlenet PW's are case insensitive
and the whole "why should blizz do anything diff, users are morons" circle starts again

sigh

anyone with even half a brain knows that is a bad security policy....
but ok ok, i'm sorry, Blizzard is immaculate lol Rolling Eyes


Of course they could improve on the password requirements, but would that fix the problem with technically inept people / people without common sense getting hacked?


of course not
but that is not the point, the point is simply it is BAD policy
Back to top
Yondaime
VIP Member



Posts: 11741

PostPosted: Sat, 26th May 2012 16:08    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 15:42; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Page 312 of 512 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 311, 312, 313 ... 510, 511, 512  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group