| Page 1 of 3 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
|
 Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:10 Post subject: about the "anarchism at work" thread |
|
 |
First of all, i dint understand, why thread was locked.
Secondly, why was Nhiumewyn banned ?
it was zipfero and newty who kept doing bullshit over bullshit, in order to close that thread. Everyone else had a nice, civilized conversation,
If you (whoever) want to ban someone, ban them.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nalo
nothing
Posts: 13632
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:14 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Nalo on Wed, 3rd Jul 2024 06:35; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:14 Post subject: |
|
|
Good riddance to him. He was perma-banned last time for being a colossal douche and it seems he was back to his old tricks pretty quickly. You may say "nice, civilised conversation" but you couldn't be further from the truth, the entire thing was one-sided with Derprin attacking anybody who doesn't agree to his bullshit principles. All he ever does is insult and belittle people, acting as if he is superior (like most anarchists  ) and basically shitting over everybody else. There was no conversation there, just him ramming his opinion down everyone's throat and then having the gall to whine about maturity.
What really pisses me off is that each time DXWarlock or Couleur came out with a proper question, or tried to have a decent discussion, Derprin would always twist it around and squirm out of any legitimate answers, often pulling out utterly retarded analogies that make no fucking sense. Apparently, my saying that the government are entitled to tax the populace based on services rendered and received, is like my saying a rapist is entitled to rape women because they dress sexily.
The guy is a fucking mega-douche. Yeah, good riddance.
Last edited by sabin1981 on Mon, 28th May 2012 21:25; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Nalo wrote: | | Well it was a UV thread. Spam ain't against the rules. |
This!
If the topic was in General it probably would have been locked a while ago.
Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
couleur
[Moderator] Janitor
Posts: 14654
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Last time, if I remember correctly, it took different dimensions, we had a plethora of threads in the GC and WN sections, and things seemed to get really a bit ugly with him and his family life and the way he treated others here (vis-versa). I think most of the hate comes from that time.
I thought that Ron had this special rule about him not to enter discussions about these kind of topics anymore.
Anyway, I'm sure he'll be back. I will save my earlier written post until that time. lol
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14273
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
he was actually quite moderate this time.. people who spammed were more annoying
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Last edited by JackQ on Mon, 28th May 2012 21:25; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14273
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
you didn't really respond to his claims,he actually took more deeper and philosophical approach,which is legitimate,you disagrees with is claims(which I'm as well),answer them in more civilized manner
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:33 Post subject: Re: about the "anarchism at work" thread |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | | why was Nhiumewyn banned ? |
+1
Made in China is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:35 Post subject: |
|
|
The thread was in the useless void where it belonged.
Why so many got butthurt about his tirades I dunno, you COULD just ignore it you know?
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| JackQ wrote: | | you didn't really respond to his claims,he actually took more deeper and philosophical approach,which is legitimate,you disagrees with is claims(which I'm as well),answer them in more civilized manner |
And who are you to tell me how I should conduct myself? Step off. I've done the "let's be civilised" shit the last time he was here, which ended smashingly honest! He comes back and does the exact same rubbish all over again; insulting and belittling people, lording his supposed superiority over everybody and going on epic rants about perceived injustices. I'm surprised he kept the death threats to a minimum this time So no, I have no intention of having a discussion with him, civilised or otherwise, since no matter what you or anyone says; he will NEVER concede a point. He won't even attempt to see the situation from your view, or indeed anyone else's for that matter, you're just a bug to him and that's how he talks to everybody.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:40 Post subject: |
|
|
He got banned for doing something he was told not to do if he returned. He wasnt banned because of his views, he was banned because in the past these threads led to him spamming *EVERY* thread on the forum with the same arguments, he was told if he came back he needed to just ignore this kind of stuff and he didn't. Simple as that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:47 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Ankh, you are joking right? Surely you must have known it was...him?
edit: I mean 100% known it was him.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14273
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| [sYn] wrote: | | He got banned for doing something he was told not to do if he returned. He wasnt banned because of his views, he was banned because in the past these threads led to him spamming *EVERY* thread on the forum with the same arguments, he was told if he came back he needed to just ignore this kind of stuff and he didn't. Simple as that. |
I don't remember him talking to much about anarchy(as Nhiumewyn} beside that thread,I think it was legitimate to talk about it because the thread was about it from the first place...
@sabin1981
as you wish,don't want don't do,just know that:trying to counter arguments you disagree with proper response is always better then "you are wrong tralala" approach which doesn't make you look better then your "opponent"'
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Last edited by JackQ on Mon, 28th May 2012 21:54; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose its nothing wrong with having different views or sharing your beliefs - but that last thread turned into something I'd expect from a suicidebomber or similar. (not the subject, but the way he was almost fanatic in defending anarchism)
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:56 Post subject: |
|
|
If being fanatic is a bannable offense, 10% of the people on this forum should be banned. Selective banning ftw I guess.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| Ankh wrote: | | I suppose its nothing wrong with having different views or sharing your beliefs - but that last thread turned into something I'd expect from a suicidebomber or similar. (not the subject, but the way he was almost fanatic in defending anarchism) |
YEah, but I thought it was pretty established by now that he was/is not defending anarchy, but his love for free market and privatization, which most anarchist disaproves of.
He was defending his own personal view. And people kept asking questions, making me assume they wanted to have somewhat of a discussion with him?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23429
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mister_s wrote: | | If being fanatic is a bannable offense, 10% of the people on this forum should be banned. Selective banning ftw I guess. |
Being a fanatic isnt an offense (ofc depending on how far he takes it) - but imo there is a limit on exactly how far You can let someone go. This time I do belive it was abit harsh though...atleast from my point of view. I only saw his spew out his anarchy fanatism in very few threads which was about this subject. Last time we saw him get carried away in every single thread where anarchy could find something to whine about.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
| Posted: Mon, 28th May 2012 21:59 Post subject: |
|
|
| JackQ wrote: | | I don't remember him talking to much about anarchy(as Nhiumewyn} beside that thread,I think it was legitimate to talk about it because the thread was about it from the first place... |
Whilst that is a fair point JackQ, the only reason he was able to remain on the forum under his new name was due to the fact that he was keeping away from these kinds of threads. The fact is that he got many many many chances during his last stay, including an unbanning after promising to keep his ranting in one place and actually respond to reasonable questioning, he failed to do this and was perm banned. I have no intention of giving him further chances to prove that he can keep himself together and in one place.
He may yet get another chance, I have yet to discuss the topic with the other mods.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
" thread in the first place. He was the one that started creating a thread just to annoy people. It was a blatant attempt to goad people into an argument, so Neon created the "Anarchism at work 
