Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 10:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
i might not like ogrish.com but this is not right.
jesus christ was a gangsta rapper. they killed him. he came back and made a platinum album.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 11:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
I also find Ogrish distastful. However as the censorship laws do not cover this kind of material I would say that this type of action is illegal.
I hope someone takes them to court.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JeanLuc_
VIP Member
Posts: 220
Location: Enterprise
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 11:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
As u guys said i don´t have to agree with Ogrish but censorship is not right..
I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere...

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Rat
Banned
Posts: 655
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 12:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ogrish.com "censors" content also by choosing what videos to show and what not to show.
For instance the infamous video of the American soldier murdering the injured Iraqi resistance fighter in the mosque is the "toned" down version that does not show the horrific violence. I find it interesting that they post the "lite" version.
As a father with kids I certainly don't mind this sort of crap being censored. I would not want my kids stumbling across this by accident.
There is no need for people to see material like this. This is not something people should become used to seeing.
kirkblitz wrote: | You attack other people constantly for not loving blacks or asians or whatever. YOU are the most hateful of us all, you sit there and preach hate toward people who dont like diversity |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 12:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
If you don't like it, don't go there. I don't mind the site.
The Rat wrote: |
There is no need for people to see material like this. |
Why not, its reality
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GP Force
Posts: 861
Location: Hair today, gone tomorrow
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 12:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
Jenni wrote: | I also find Ogrish distastful. However as the censorship laws do not cover this kind of material I would say that this type of action is illegal.
I hope someone takes them to court. |
And so is life dear Jenni....
"I hope someone takes them to court"
For what??? For showing what happens in reality, how a dead person looks like, how an accident occurs? I rather ban all the fake hollywood movies. Realise kids will belive evrything they seen in the movies, which is VERY UNREALISTIC.
I've seen dead/accidents/gun wounds people in reality, and sure the first time it was a horrible experience but as with evrything else you somewhat get used to it... no not really but it's more "bearable"
Site like ogrish is a good thing if you ask me, hollywood movies is far more dangerous since they stray FAR away from reality, doesn't mean evry action/war movie out there, but most of the blockbusters...
Truth sucks, hey it's reality....
@Rat
"There is no need for people to see material like this. This is not something people should become used to seeing."
Why??? It's reality, don't watch anymore hollywood films then if you wanna see bullshit.....
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
yup. reality is harsh. not ogrish fault. dont see why this should be hidden for the public.
and they do have warning labels before entering, dont they?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
I think jenni meant the goverment for illegaly censoring them. And how the hell do you stumble upon that site? lol
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:40 Post subject: |
|
 |
i think jenny ment the censor not ogrish.
jesus christ was a gangsta rapper. they killed him. he came back and made a platinum album.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GP Force
Posts: 861
Location: Hair today, gone tomorrow
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ollax
VIP Member
Posts: 2154
Location: Here today, Hell tomorrow!
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
Couldnt care less if that piece of shit site got lost in oblivion togheter with rotten.com and other sites like it!
However i dont like censorship and as a lawstudent i will have to say that if you start fucking with freedom of speech, then whats next, religion? opinions?
Of all the things i've lost, i miss my mind the most!
"Ozzy Osbourne"
_ _ _ _ _

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 14:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
GP Force wrote: | Jenni wrote: | I also find Ogrish distastful. However as the censorship laws do not cover this kind of material I would say that this type of action is illegal.
I hope someone takes them to court. |
And so is life dear Jenni....
"I hope someone takes them to court"
For what??? For showing what happens in reality, how a dead person looks like, how an accident occurs? I rather ban all the fake hollywood movies. Realise kids will belive evrything they seen in the movies, which is VERY UNREALISTIC.
I've seen dead/accidents/gun wounds people in reality, and sure the first time it was a horrible experience but as with evrything else you somewhat get used to it... no not really but it's more "bearable"
Site like ogrish is a good thing if you ask me, hollywood movies is far more dangerous since they stray FAR away from reality, doesn't mean evry action/war movie out there, but most of the blockbusters...
Truth sucks, hey it's reality....
@Rat
"There is no need for people to see material like this. This is not something people should become used to seeing."
Why??? It's reality, don't watch anymore hollywood films then if you wanna see bullshit..... |
lol... seeing more and more pics of split skulls or ripped off arms makes it more bearable for.... what?... to see more pics of it? or what is it good for? and this is not reality either... reality isnt a closeup snapshot of a slit throat or whatever...
and if you dont want your kids to become a bit more realistic then dont show em comics or teletubbies or all that shit... and anyway... would you like your kids to see a naked girl spreading her legs? or a dick sticking in a girls mouth? cause thats reality too you know...
and last but not least...for mentally weak ppl or ppl with a certain fetish it might not be enough to see the pics... they might wanna see it in reality... and this site might just be the trigger...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 14:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
I dont get a sick feeling if i look at the pictures. But that doens't mean i have a fetish 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 14:40 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 14:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
i never saw it in real life. But i don't think i would feel sick if i would.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 17:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
just look at skids avatar you knowe he's hardcore
anyway it seems 1 in 3 vidoes you click on are fighting videos now. Some are ok and funny but when its like 2 on 1 and face boots I dont really like watching it. You all musta seen the video of the guy walking out of court and getting shot by the dad who's son he raped. There's a little bit of satisfaction with that even though it is brutal. Some of the videos are disgusting but just because they're all in one single place it makes it easier than scanning the net. I dont think it will get censoered at all because it already has 18+ warnings and all that.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 21:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yes, I mean't the Government. It's a disgrace that they've blocked the site. Fair enough if they were enacting on existing laws, like for child porn. But when they select sites to block at will, well they're nothing better than the Chinese or some middle eastern country.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 21:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
child porn is reality too, why censor child porn??
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 22:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
SceneLeader wrote: | child porn is reality too, why censor child porn?? |
that is by far the supidest comparison one could have made....
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 22:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
SycoShaman wrote: | SceneLeader wrote: | child porn is reality too, why censor child porn?? |
that is by far the supidest comparison one could have made.... |
hm...why?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 22:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Pedophilia. The other is just "bad taste" issue.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 22:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
weird0 wrote: | SycoShaman wrote: | SceneLeader wrote: | child porn is reality too, why censor child porn?? |
that is by far the supidest comparison one could have made.... |
hm...why? |
i hardly see how basically unedited news footage can be compared to the rape and sodomy of a child....a child being forced into sex from some sicko is WAY different then watching someone get executed, or beatin, or whatever
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 22:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
SycoShaman wrote: | weird0 wrote: | SycoShaman wrote: |
that is by far the supidest comparison one could have made.... |
hm...why? |
i hardly see how basically unedited news footage can be compared to the rape and sodomy of a child....a child being forced into sex from some sicko is WAY different then watching someone get executed, or beatin, or whatever |
ogrish it's not about supplying people with "unedited news footage". if that was this sites' intention they would have articles, references, etc on what happened.
it's simply about showing disgusting and horrible crime/accident victims. all you can see there is some punchline like "Burned to Death After Truck Crash" + pics.
NOBODY visits ogrish to see unedited news. it is ONLY interesting for sick fucks who enjoy seeing the extreme. just like those who watch child porn.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 23:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
dude, I dont know how u can argue gruesome footage against child porn...
really...maybe Im not explaining my position well enough, but seriously....i dont understand how u cant see the difference between someone being murdered, burned alive, beatin, shot, stabbed etc as compared to a child being forced into a sexual act - and which is usually sodomy or something really fucked up...man, the ppl in the those death vids died regardless whether u watch em or not. However, if there werent a sicko market for child porn, none would be available and the kids who would have been forced into making the movies wouldnt be.
Personally, I didnt watch any video on the site as I find watching someone died or something like that disgusting and disrespectful...however u can not say that because death vids are ok, child porn is too...now mind u, if someone was murderering ppl for the sake of the videos and that was the arguement, then I'd agree
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 23:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
SycoShaman wrote: | ...however u can not say that because death vids are ok, child porn is too... |
LOL, you DO get that i think BOTH is NOT OK, right?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jenni
Banned
Posts: 9526
Location: England.
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 23:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
Jesus. How the fuck can anyone compare child porn with Ogrish.
What a fucked up forum we have.
Maybe the people on here that support child porn should end up on Ogrish. That I would fully support.
Hell I would even enjoy the footage.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 23:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
Jenni wrote: | Jesus. How the fuck can anyone compare child porn with Ogrish.
What a fucked up forum we have.
Maybe the people on here that support child porn should end up on Ogrish. That I would fully support.
Hell I would even enjoy the footage. |
uhm... you do realize how ignorant you are being right? since both clearly stated that they find BOTH not ok.. not both ok... ok?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 23:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |