|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
poullou
Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
|
 Posted: Thu, 8th Sep 2005 13:46 Post subject: News Corporation buys game sites for $650 million |
|
 |
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26027
WOW...
Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member
Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu, 8th Sep 2005 20:28 Post subject: |
|
|
So everything is gunna have a touch of republican in it now....?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 8th Sep 2005 23:06 Post subject: |
|
|
sure better than touch of liberals.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu, 8th Sep 2005 23:54 Post subject: |
|
|
"For those not in the know, sites under the IGN network include IGN.com, GameSpy, GameSpy Arena, FilePlanet, TeamXbox, 3D Gamers, Direct2Drive, GameStats.com and a handful of sites under the Vault and Planet networks."
lol, a handful.. more like a hundred 
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheNerd
Posts: 1025
Location: Israel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Sep 2005 01:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| TheNerd wrote: | | i wouldnt have paying a dime for these sites.. |
Same. But, you gotta admit, they do pull a hella lotta traffic. Their reviews may not be worth shit, but ad wise I think they may have made a good investment.
By the way TheNerd, I know you're trying to work on your English, so just so you know, its "I wouldn't have payed a dime for these sites" (past tense not future) 
I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Sep 2005 06:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | sure better than touch of liberals. |
jesus christ....I almost swallowed my cigarette when I read that.
Are u serious man?
I'd much rather have the democrats in power than the republicans...liberals, as a party, yeah, in canada they are fucked but its the ppl, not the idealism
Having a republican government is like saying to all the oil and big buisness companies "here u go, a country of ur own". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Sep 2005 22:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | jesus christ....I almost swallowed my cigarette when I read that.
Are u serious man?
I'd much rather have the democrats in power than the republicans...liberals, as a party, yeah, in canada they are fucked but its the ppl, not the idealism
Having a republican government is like saying to all the oil and big buisness companies "here u go, a country of ur own". |
Are you stupid? Liberal is just another name for the Democratic party. Democratic party wants to regulate internet, censor video game violence, ban guns, and are huge supporters of DMCA.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat, 10th Sep 2005 00:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | Quote: | jesus christ....I almost swallowed my cigarette when I read that.
Are u serious man?
I'd much rather have the democrats in power than the republicans...liberals, as a party, yeah, in canada they are fucked but its the ppl, not the idealism
Having a republican government is like saying to all the oil and big buisness companies "here u go, a country of ur own". |
Are you stupid? Liberal is just another name for the Democratic party. Democratic party wants to regulate internet, censor video game violence, ban guns, and are huge supporters of DMCA. |
maybe in the US, not in Canada...and ur asking me if im stupid? in canada its way different and i figured that the Liberal Party had a generalized idealism as oppose to it changing depending on the country.
And look what ur arguing for...Oh no, lets not elect the democrats cuz | Quote: | | Democratic party wants to regulate internet, censor video game violence, ban guns, and are huge supporters of DMCA |
....instead lets keep big business in power, lets go to war for no reason, lets let the current government keep fuckin over the ppl of the world - not to mention their own ppl.
The only issue I think that actually matters (in regards to the ones u mentioned) is the gun issue...and I mean, who wants gun regulation, less death, less crime which = less poverty? fuck, only a safer country.....naw, lets all re-elect a war happy, corrupt ass administration that doesnt censor videogames and the internet (which, btw, the republicans are more involved in than the democrats - new venture ya know?) and one that doesnt enforce gun regulation (atleast as a minimum)....
man, its ur type of american mentallity that stupifies me...seriously....ur arguing videogame censorship against the destablization of the world and war....give ur head a shake dude. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 10th Sep 2005 01:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | maybe in the US, not in Canada...and ur asking me if im stupid? in canada its way different and i figured that the Liberal Party had a generalized idealism as oppose to it changing depending on the country. |
Are we talking about Canada, no. We are talking about US, so stick to the topic.
| Quote: |
....instead lets keep big business in power, lets go to war for no reason, lets let the current government keep fuckin over the ppl of the world - not to mention their own ppl. |
Right, Saddam Hussein is a saint, government should control companies and businesses like in China. If you like communism so much, go live in china.
| Quote: | | The only issue I think that actually matters (in regards to the ones u mentioned) is the gun issue...and I mean, who wants gun regulation, less death, less crime which = less poverty? fuck, only a safer country.....naw, lets all re-elect a war happy, corrupt ass administration that doesnt censor videogames and the internet (which, btw, the republicans are more involved in than the democrats - new venture ya know?) and one that doesnt enforce gun regulation (atleast as a minimum).... |
Right... less gun = less violence, only naive, self-rightous, moron think that's true. Why not just ban piracy, then no one will pirate anymore. Why don't we just ban knife, scissors and all pointy things, and support Saddam Hussein and dictorship governments, then the world will be a big loving family.
| Quote: | | man, its ur type of american mentallity that stupifies me...seriously....ur arguing videogame censorship against the destablization of the world and war....give ur head a shake dude. |
Your type of naive, hippie thinking is the real stupidity. Let me guess, video gaming violence censorship = good, companies try prevent copyright infringement = bad. Ban gun = good, Attack Saddam Hussein = bad. Saddam Hussein wage war on other countries = good, US wage war on Saddam Hussein = bad, Saddam Hussein = saint, Geroge bush = devil. Here's a reality check for you, not every problem in the world can be solved through peaceful negotation, if that's true, there won't be need of police anymore. Why don't you go negotiate with Osama Bin Laden, let's see how far you get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Rat
Banned
Posts: 655
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 02:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Are we talking about Canada, no. We are talking about US, so stick to the topic. |
Nice way to try to cover up your ignorance, lol.
| kirkblitz wrote: | | You attack other people constantly for not loving blacks or asians or whatever. YOU are the most hateful of us all, you sit there and preach hate toward people who dont like diversity |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 03:01 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="vodkaLord"] | Quote: |
Right... less gun = less violence, only naive, self-rightous, moron think that's true. Why not just ban piracy, then no one will pirate anymore. Why don't we just ban knife, scissors and all pointy things, and support Saddam Hussein and dictorship governments, then the world will be a big loving family. |
Not less violence but less murders, deaths. When you get so mad that you can't think and you're carrying a gun, what's gonna stop you from using it?
When nobody is carrying a gun, only some serious criminals you'll have less murders. Pretty simple huh ?  Also when everybody has a gun, the police has to use guns too. And violence supports violence.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 05:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | Quote: | | maybe in the US, not in Canada...and ur asking me if im stupid? in canada its way different and i figured that the Liberal Party had a generalized idealism as oppose to it changing depending on the country. |
Are we talking about Canada, no. We are talking about US, so stick to the topic.
| Quote: |
....instead lets keep big business in power, lets go to war for no reason, lets let the current government keep fuckin over the ppl of the world - not to mention their own ppl. |
Right, Saddam Hussein is a saint, government should control companies and businesses like in China. If you like communism so much, go live in china.
| Quote: | | The only issue I think that actually matters (in regards to the ones u mentioned) is the gun issue...and I mean, who wants gun regulation, less death, less crime which = less poverty? fuck, only a safer country.....naw, lets all re-elect a war happy, corrupt ass administration that doesnt censor videogames and the internet (which, btw, the republicans are more involved in than the democrats - new venture ya know?) and one that doesnt enforce gun regulation (atleast as a minimum).... |
Right... less gun = less violence, only naive, self-rightous, moron think that's true. Why not just ban piracy, then no one will pirate anymore. Why don't we just ban knife, scissors and all pointy things, and support Saddam Hussein and dictorship governments, then the world will be a big loving family.
| Quote: | | man, its ur type of american mentallity that stupifies me...seriously....ur arguing videogame censorship against the destablization of the world and war....give ur head a shake dude. |
Your type of naive, hippie thinking is the real stupidity. Let me guess, video gaming violence censorship = good, companies try prevent copyright infringement = bad. Ban gun = good, Attack Saddam Hussein = bad. Saddam Hussein wage war on other countries = good, US wage war on Saddam Hussein = bad, Saddam Hussein = saint, Geroge bush = devil. Here's a reality check for you, not every problem in the world can be solved through peaceful negotation, if that's true, there won't be need of police anymore. Why don't you go negotiate with Osama Bin Laden, let's see how far you get. |
Ur cracked man...seriously.
Gun control = less related gun crime...seriously, think about in logical sense, not with a nra, redneck way man.
Im not saying that gun control and regulation would completely resolve crime - thats retarded to think that and ur retarded for assuming that. But it would cut gun crime rate down, even if by a lil , its still somewhere to start.
What happened to a good old knife fight? atleast u have a better chance of not dying and it actually requires skill. Any idiot can get a gat, walk up on someone and pull the trigger if they really wanted to...no skill, or honour in that at all. And thats the problem, the honour in one on one fighting, even with weapons, has been lost.
On to Saddam...haha hippie.
First off, I agreed with Bush and the US when they first wanted to go into iraq with the reason being regime change. I agree that Saddam is a threat. But, instead they went on false grounds, which is quite clear by now. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction...they're military force was half the size as comapred to the first gulf war.
Saddam invading countries? Yeah, he invaded Kuwait, and he got fucked in the ass for it. He has done shit since. I suppose ur gunna say that he's linked to bin laden....nope, which has also been proven by the independent commissions. So, what charge, based on the ones the US campaigned on, has turned out to be true? none, if anything, all that has happened is more destabilzation in the mid east, and more hatred toward the US and its ppl - which is unfair as I dont think Bush speaks for the majority of america anymore...maybe the white collar rednecks who run the big business.
I am for the war against Bin laden...BUT WHAT THE FUCK DOES BIN LADEN HAVE TO DO WITH IRAQ?! Its been proven, by the US government, that Saddam has had no affiliation with Bin Laden. Bin laden and the fundamentalists look down on Saddam as he isnt a "good muslim" or whatever (look at his lifestyle).Jesus christ dude, if ur gunna actually try to debate something, atleast read some of the threads in the world news section or maybe do a lil investigation somewhere else, accquire some REAL, factual knowledge, then debate. Dont just spout shit that bush says on his weekly radio address really...makes u look as stupid as he is...to be honest, im surprised u didnt call saddam an "evil doer"
Oh, one question.
Situation - N.Korea is 6 months to a year from building nuclear weapons (remember this was a good 4 months before Iraq war began in 03) - according to US Security officals. Kim Jong IL is a crazy fuck and N Korea is already involved in alot of illegal shit (drugs, weapons etc) - so its logical to assume that yeah they may not use the nukes, but sell em off or sell the technology. And this was all verified, if u recall.
Now Iraq. SUSPECTED mobile weapons sites, SUSPECTED chemical weapons labs and many more SUSPECTED but not confirmed things were presented as a case for Iraq.
UN found nothing in the what, 8 month investigation? and as I recall, they were given decent access (or it might have been complete, I cant recall).
So, who poses the bigger threat?
....if u say saddam man....*shakes head*
And no, I don't agree with censorship of any kind - especially videogames. I think its up to the parents to regulate what their kids play and watch.
its funny, u assume so much..shouldnt do that man 
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 09:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Not less violence but less murders, deaths. When you get so mad that you can't think and you're carrying a gun, what's gonna stop you from using it?
When nobody is carrying a gun, only some serious criminals you'll have less murders. Pretty simple huh ? Also when everybody has a gun, the police has to use guns too. And violence supports violence. |
right... you can't kill someone with a knife? If you are mad enough to kill someone, you can just pick up a rock from the ground and smash the guy on the head. There are infinite ways to murder someone, a gun is one of worst weapons of choice.
| Quote: | Ur cracked man...seriously.
Gun control = less related gun crime...seriously, think about in logical sense, not with a nra, redneck way man.
Im not saying that gun control and regulation would completely resolve crime - thats retarded to think that and ur retarded for assuming that. But it would cut gun crime rate down, even if by a lil , its still somewhere to start.
What happened to a good old knife fight? atleast u have a better chance of not dying and it actually requires skill. Any idiot can get a gat, walk up on someone and pull the trigger if they really wanted to...no skill, or honour in that at all. And thats the problem, the honour in one on one fighting, even with weapons, has been lost. |
If criminals can't use gun to kill, they'll find some other weapon to kill, it's that simple. I think you've watched too many michael moore films. The NRA was close friend of Martin Luther King, so that will make Martin Luther King a red neck? Ban gun to reduce gun crime is as pointless as shut down a p2p network to prevent copyright infringement. People will create new weapons that aren't "gun", thus bypass your ban.
| Quote: | On to Saddam...haha hippie.
First off, I agreed with Bush and the US when they first wanted to go into iraq with the reason being regime change. I agree that Saddam is a threat. But, instead they went on false grounds, which is quite clear by now. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction...they're military force was half the size as comapred to the first gulf war.
Saddam invading countries? Yeah, he invaded Kuwait, and he got fucked in the ass for it. He has done shit since. I suppose ur gunna say that he's linked to bin laden....nope, which has also been proven by the independent commissions. So, what charge, based on the ones the US campaigned on, has turned out to be true? none, if anything, all that has happened is more destabilzation in the mid east, and more hatred toward the US and its ppl - which is unfair as I dont think Bush speaks for the majority of america anymore...maybe the white collar rednecks who run the big business. |
you think saddam is dumb enough to stock WMD in his backyard for UN inspector to see? He surely can hide it in some underground facility that no other country knows, then when UN inspector comes, put on a show, try to convince him that Iraq is poor and defenseless. The independent commission did not prove shit, just because they could not find evidence of link to Bin Laden, does not mean a link doesn't exist. After all, Saddasm isn't an idiot, he is highly secretive and paranoid. Last time i checked, Clinton also attacked mid east, so you can say liberals are also white collar rednecks.
| Quote: | | I am for the war against Bin laden...BUT WHAT THE FUCK DOES BIN LADEN HAVE TO DO WITH IRAQ?! Its been proven, by the US government, that Saddam has had no affiliation with Bin Laden. Bin laden and the fundamentalists look down on Saddam as he isnt a "good muslim" or whatever (look at his lifestyle).Jesus christ dude, if ur gunna actually try to debate something, atleast read some of the threads in the world news section or maybe do a lil investigation somewhere else, accquire some REAL, factual knowledge, then debate. Dont just spout shit that bush says on his weekly radio address really...makes u look as stupid as he is...to be honest, im surprised u didnt call saddam an "evil doer" |
Oh, and where do you get your information? From michael moore? You think saddam should be pardoned for his war crime because he hasn't commited any war crimes lately? Mabey Bin Laden doesn't think highly of Saddam, but Saddam is clearly pro-taliban. It has been proven that Saddam has harboured Taliban members in the past. And he may do it today if he wasn't captured. Bin Laden is obviously difficult to capture, the Clinton administration was not able to capture him for 8 years. Even if Bin Laden is captured, Taliban will not die. So US may feel it should focus improve overall security rather than devote everything to capture Bin Laden.
| Quote: | Oh, one question.
Situation - N.Korea is 6 months to a year from building nuclear weapons (remember this was a good 4 months before Iraq war began in 03) - according to US Security officals. Kim Jong IL is a crazy fuck and N Korea is already involved in alot of illegal shit (drugs, weapons etc) - so its logical to assume that yeah they may not use the nukes, but sell em off or sell the technology. And this was all verified, if u recall.
Now Iraq. SUSPECTED mobile weapons sites, SUSPECTED chemical weapons labs and many more SUSPECTED but not confirmed things were presented as a case for Iraq.
UN found nothing in the what, 8 month investigation? and as I recall, they were given decent access (or it might have been complete, I cant recall).So, who poses the bigger threat?
....if u say saddam man....*shakes head*
|
Think, dude, Korea mabey planning to build nuclear weapon, but right now, they don't have any. And until they do, you don't have any shit on them no matter how crazy you think Kin Jong Li is. Drugs? Weapons? US can't even control illegal drug and weapons inside the US itself, why would they go after other country for it. So you have *verified* Korean can PROBABLY sell their nuke to terrorists? You can't verify things that have not happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 11:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | Quote: | Not less violence but less murders, deaths. When you get so mad that you can't think and you're carrying a gun, what's gonna stop you from using it?
When nobody is carrying a gun, only some serious criminals you'll have less murders. Pretty simple huh ? Also when everybody has a gun, the police has to use guns too. And violence supports violence. |
right... you can't kill someone with a knife? If you are mad enough to kill someone, you can just pick up a rock from the ground and smash the guy on the head. There are infinite ways to murder someone, a gun is one of worst weapons of choice.
| Quote: | Ur cracked man...seriously.
Gun control = less related gun crime...seriously, think about in logical sense, not with a nra, redneck way man.
Im not saying that gun control and regulation would completely resolve crime - thats retarded to think that and ur retarded for assuming that. But it would cut gun crime rate down, even if by a lil , its still somewhere to start.
What happened to a good old knife fight? atleast u have a better chance of not dying and it actually requires skill. Any idiot can get a gat, walk up on someone and pull the trigger if they really wanted to...no skill, or honour in that at all. And thats the problem, the honour in one on one fighting, even with weapons, has been lost. |
If criminals can't use gun to kill, they'll find some other weapon to kill, it's that simple. I think you've watched too many michael moore films. The NRA was close friend of Martin Luther King, so that will make Martin Luther King a red neck? Ban gun to reduce gun crime is as pointless as shut down a p2p network to prevent copyright infringement. People will create new weapons that aren't "gun", thus bypass your ban.
| Quote: | On to Saddam...haha hippie.
First off, I agreed with Bush and the US when they first wanted to go into iraq with the reason being regime change. I agree that Saddam is a threat. But, instead they went on false grounds, which is quite clear by now. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction...they're military force was half the size as comapred to the first gulf war.
Saddam invading countries? Yeah, he invaded Kuwait, and he got fucked in the ass for it. He has done shit since. I suppose ur gunna say that he's linked to bin laden....nope, which has also been proven by the independent commissions. So, what charge, based on the ones the US campaigned on, has turned out to be true? none, if anything, all that has happened is more destabilzation in the mid east, and more hatred toward the US and its ppl - which is unfair as I dont think Bush speaks for the majority of america anymore...maybe the white collar rednecks who run the big business. |
you think saddam is dumb enough to stock WMD in his backyard for UN inspector to see? He surely can hide it in some underground facility that no other country knows, then when UN inspector comes, put on a show, try to convince him that Iraq is poor and defenseless. The independent commission did not prove shit, just because they could not find evidence of link to Bin Laden, does not mean a link doesn't exist. After all, Saddasm isn't an idiot, he is highly secretive and paranoid. Last time i checked, Clinton also attacked mid east, so you can say liberals are also white collar rednecks.
| Quote: | | I am for the war against Bin laden...BUT WHAT THE FUCK DOES BIN LADEN HAVE TO DO WITH IRAQ?! Its been proven, by the US government, that Saddam has had no affiliation with Bin Laden. Bin laden and the fundamentalists look down on Saddam as he isnt a "good muslim" or whatever (look at his lifestyle).Jesus christ dude, if ur gunna actually try to debate something, atleast read some of the threads in the world news section or maybe do a lil investigation somewhere else, accquire some REAL, factual knowledge, then debate. Dont just spout shit that bush says on his weekly radio address really...makes u look as stupid as he is...to be honest, im surprised u didnt call saddam an "evil doer" |
Oh, and where do you get your information? From michael moore? You think saddam should be pardoned for his war crime because he hasn't commited any war crimes lately? Mabey Bin Laden doesn't think highly of Saddam, but Saddam is clearly pro-taliban. It has been proven that Saddam has harboured Taliban members in the past. And he may do it today if he wasn't captured. Bin Laden is obviously difficult to capture, the Clinton administration was not able to capture him for 8 years. Even if Bin Laden is captured, Taliban will not die. So US may feel it should focus improve overall security rather than devote everything to capture Bin Laden.
| Quote: | Oh, one question.
Situation - N.Korea is 6 months to a year from building nuclear weapons (remember this was a good 4 months before Iraq war began in 03) - according to US Security officals. Kim Jong IL is a crazy fuck and N Korea is already involved in alot of illegal shit (drugs, weapons etc) - so its logical to assume that yeah they may not use the nukes, but sell em off or sell the technology. And this was all verified, if u recall.
Now Iraq. SUSPECTED mobile weapons sites, SUSPECTED chemical weapons labs and many more SUSPECTED but not confirmed things were presented as a case for Iraq.
UN found nothing in the what, 8 month investigation? and as I recall, they were given decent access (or it might have been complete, I cant recall).So, who poses the bigger threat?
....if u say saddam man....*shakes head*
|
Think, dude, Korea mabey planning to build nuclear weapon, but right now, they don't have any. And until they do, you don't have any shit on them no matter how crazy you think Kin Jong Li is. Drugs? Weapons? US can't even control illegal drug and weapons inside the US itself, why would they go after other country for it. So you have *verified* Korean can PROBABLY sell their nuke to terrorists? You can't verify things that have not happened. |
honestly, the stupidity in ur posts is amazing...NORTH KOREA HAS SAID THEY HAVE NUKES, YOUR FUCKIN USA HAS COMFIRMED IT....not michael moore, or anyone else u like to pass the buck off on, THE USA'S INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES HAVE SAID THIS - wait, lemme guess, Mike Moore also runs Homeland Security and the CIA and shit right?....
It was confirmed they had atleast 6-7 nukes last year and were still enriching uranium...
The independent UN thing didnt find anything...just the the AMERICAN INVASION DIDNT FIND ANYTHING...for fuck sakes, give ur goddamn head a shake.
Seriously, I dont mind debating if u actually state shit that is correct or could be, like 4me2...but dude, stop being some uneducated, punk ass kid (who's father spouts nothing but bush bullshit while cleaning his 12 gauge)who doesnt think for himself...
And man, look at WORLD STATS when it comes to gun control...every country has gun crime, no doubt. BUT THOSE WITH GUN CONTROL HAVE LESS CRIME!! Even saving the life of one person through gun regulation is worth it
Anyway, u really piss me off...cuz like i said, its not likeu respond with any current, factual information...dude, ur daddy isnt right all the time...neither is FOXNews and yeah, the US Government is corrupt...wait wait, I forgot, the US Gov is the only true, pure, "democratic" government right? Is it hard to see while walking around with a bag on ur head....?
And on the subject of Bin Laden...if i was gunna catch a terrorist who did some shit like that, I would send my best troops in from the get go...initially 11K troops were in afghanistan and it took 2 fuckin months for spec ops to get in there....2 months head start is pretty good.
And no, just incase ur gunna spout some of ur mike moore bullshit (like every redneck does) and how im preaching what he says....nope, Im basing it off of public records and things i have heard from white house press conferences and shit...not some fat fuck who is biased to begin with....
And Clinton couldnt catch him yeah, because they were fighting an intelligence war...after 9/11, it became a military war (now were back to intel again id say)...did clinton send troops into afghanistan? did bin laden bomb the US while he was president? Could clinton have gotten away with going into afghanistan (nope)? Honestly, ur comparison's are so flawed, do u not read what u write?
Anyway, just like Weducks, ur on ignore....reply if u wish, but i wont see it...
To all other americans on here
Vodka is the sort u should deport....total blind ignorance and is gunna run ur country into the ground
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poullou
Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 11:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| poullou wrote: | Jesus....you fucked my topic  |
sorry man...but it still amazes me see someone as stupid and blinded as Vodka....sad fuckin world were in....Americans can never admit when they're wrong...and thats ur gunna be they're downfall... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poullou
Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Sep 2005 16:27 Post subject: |
|
|
No worries Sycoshaman. It's not the first time and it surely isn't the last. What made me post this comment is the way the whole thing boosted to this war of words and opinions. At some point you(both) started to get deeper and deeper and I just couldn't follow(ok...and bored to read them all).
I don't want to place myself in either of the two sides but I know I keep somehow the same opinion like yours("Americans can never admit when they're wrong") although I have to read all the comments to be sure...
Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
| Posted: Tue, 13th Sep 2005 04:14 Post subject: |
|
|
| SycoShaman wrote: | | So everything is gunna have a touch of republican in it now....? |
News corp is actually an Australian company.. however its hq is in new york..
Rupert Murdoch is one of the most fucked up and richest people on the planet...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bxrdj
Posts: 1469
Location: Far from Home
|
| Posted: Tue, 13th Sep 2005 06:56 Post subject: |
|
|
lol, I can totally picture vodkalord as one of those middle america mindles redneck fucks who can't see further then his own nose ... so sad that its these people who choose our presidents and such ...
Syco, good man ...
fuck ...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue, 13th Sep 2005 18:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| bxrdj wrote: | lol, I can totally picture vodkalord as one of those middle america mindles redneck fucks who can't see further then his own nose ... so sad that its these people who choose our presidents and such ...
Syco, good man ... |
Its sad a few fuck the bunch over.
Ive said it before and I'll say it again, Americans are one of the most generous ppl's on this planet...yet they always seem to be run by fuckers who dont give a shit about them... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bxrdj
Posts: 1469
Location: Far from Home
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poullou
Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Sep 2005 10:06 Post subject: |
|
|
I believe this might have crossed his mind for a minute or two...
Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Sep 2005 15:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Wanna hear/see something even more funny?
Was watching Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN yesterday (7pmEST) and Steven Segal is in New Orleans and was dressed as a New Orleans SWAT Team Member....?
Ok, he's a dangerous guy still....but he's also a known "herbal" drug abuser
Why the hell does he need to be there? any ideas?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bigperm
Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Sep 2005 22:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| SoSBigperm wrote: | | SycoShaman wrote: | | poullou wrote: | | Jesus....you fucked my topic |
sorry man...but it still amazes me see someone as stupid and blinded as Vodka....sad fuckin world were in....Americans can never admit when they're wrong...and thats ur gunna be they're downfall... |
Shame on you for fucking his topic.. LOL.. but you certainly made Vodka look like a fool . |
easy considering what i was given to work with right?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dkkev
OptimusPrime
Posts: 437
|
| Posted: Sat, 17th Sep 2005 00:37 Post subject: get back on topic! |
|
|
on another note.. i thought those sites were worth far more than $650m
sounds like murdoch made a bargain...
.-.
'=(0.0)='
.='|m|'=.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
