| Page 35 of 439 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 08:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 08:30 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 10:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Meaningless pictures. It's like watching a painting after the guy has only made the first couple of outlines.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gemiko
Posts: 464
Location: Proland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 10:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| 4treyu wrote: |
Are those a joke? They look hideous, regardless of if it's Alpha or not, and in any case I doubt those would be Alpha, more like early developer build or whatever it's called  |
Yes. It's called alpha.
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 03:25; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| FISKER_Q wrote: |
Edit: Though the "Battlepacks" may be worrying, looks like we'll have better types of weapons with some kind of loot system, probably something we can buy as well. |
I am guessing Battlepacks is something we have right now as well - you can purchase a pack that includes some weapon/attachment/spec unlocks, if you don't want to progress normally.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:28 Post subject: |
|
|
That's just the Man of Steel promo.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:28 Post subject: |
|
|
I was in the BF3 alpha and the game looked the same in the final version. (I am not talking about the balance)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 03:25; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:34 Post subject: |
|
|
It's not only an alpha, it's the 360 version of the alpha. Of course it's going to look shit, BF3 looks nothing like it does on PC on the consoles now either. Lots of placeholder textures still as well. HURR DURR OMG LOOKS LIKE SHIT.
And yeah Gemiko, it does look like vehicles have limited ammo. That map also looks like it has a huge vertical element to it; check where the flags are relative to that tower he's in in some of the shots.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:41 Post subject: |
|
|
You might not be able to judge it graphically in alpha (even though BF3 still looked fa-fucking-tastic in alpha) but what we see on those it looks pretty much like BF3.
So unless that changes (what we just saw) it's starting really to look like BF3.1.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like BF3 in what regard? Graphically? Well no shit, it's only FrostBite 2.5. Same models and such? Not surprising given that it's the same setting.
I'm wondering what some people are expecting from BF4 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Werelds wrote: |
I'm wondering what some people are expecting from BF4 |
Well, I'm not expecting an add-on pack that's called BF4 which it feels like it's going to be.
So far there doesn't seem like there's any real incentive for me to stop playing BF3 and jump onboard BF4. Unless they actually have things that will make a difference.
I've already learnt from CoD that just because you change some perks around and slap on a new coat of paint on the fucker it doesn't make it a new game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 11:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 03:25; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| MinderMast wrote: | | FISKER_Q wrote: |
Edit: Though the "Battlepacks" may be worrying, looks like we'll have better types of weapons with some kind of loot system, probably something we can buy as well. |
I am guessing Battlepacks is something we have right now as well - you can purchase a pack that includes some weapon/attachment/spec unlocks, if you don't want to progress normally. |
I'm not so sure about that.
They seem to be randomized drops á la TF2 Crates, and they have a chance of dropping an advanced item. But of course we don't know what qualifies as an "advanced item" yet.
Last edited by FISKER_Q on Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:01; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23348
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:01 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:02 Post subject: |
|
|
@Interinactive: So "Battlefield: Closer to CoD than ever before"?
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:14 Post subject: |
|
|
Even if we scratch the looks - everything is still the same.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:17 Post subject: ***** |
|
|
*****
Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:14; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| Prefetian wrote: | Well, I'm not expecting an add-on pack that's called BF4 which it feels like it's going to be.
So far there doesn't seem like there's any real incentive for me to stop playing BF3 and jump onboard BF4. Unless they actually have things that will make a difference.
I've already learnt from CoD that just because you change some perks around and slap on a new coat of paint on the fucker it doesn't make it a new game. |
New maps, new vehicles, new weapons (probably), commander mode. Hopefully destruction will be ramped up.
As much as "veterans" may want to believe it, that wasn't stuff that was just patched in for BF1942 or BF2 either.
BF3 was DICE's way of putting BF back in the spotlight. The engine is just really, really good and despite the "veteran" whining BF3 is a very solid game. Yes, it's a little more infantry focused than previous BF games (excluding BC2), but that's not a bad thing because infantry were underused before (sue me). Yes, it lacked the shitty commo-rose at first; but frankly I still don't see why that was such a huge deal since I still think commo roses suck balls. The whole "OMG NO COMMO ROSE, STUPID CONSOLES" shit is fucking hilarious, because if there's ONE THING that comes from fucking consoles, it's radial fucking menus like a commo rose (if it's not clear yet, I utterly HATE that thing, gimme text-based menus instead where I can hit a series of keys or shortcut...I've got a fucking keyboard you know)
With BF4, they'll most likely come out with more maps like in AK at first rather than infantry shit first. Bringing the commander mode back kind of requires that.
"Everything is still the same" - seriously, what the fuck did you expect? Again, same setting so there's not a whole lot they can change. 1942 to 2 was a big change because of the setting. However, they still rehashed plenty of content just the same; a lot of assets were in both games. Most notably, Fail Island obviously. BF veterans have a delusional memory, sorry. Same goes for the Premium/Expansion packs now; I suggest you go back and take a look at how little content was added to 1942/2 (and probably 2142, that I dunno) in patches and just how many goddamn expansions there were. Fuck, they even did BF: Vietnam in between.
From these screenshots you can not judge jack shit. It's the 360 alpha version: placeholder textures, small maps (360 after all), lots of missing assets, shit graphics. No, it won't be as different as 1942, 2 and 2142 were from each other because it's the same setting. But I highly doubt it'll be the same game either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 9th Jun 2013 12:43 Post subject: |
|
|
So, talking shit about how CoD is the same shit year after year is OK but mention that BF4 does the same thing and you get cussed at?
I C wat u did thar! 
Commander mode is back, woohoo! \o/ (Ohh wait, wasn't that supposed to be in BF3? opps).
Seriously, they're adding shit that was _supposed_ to be in BF3 already but ok let's call them new features to the frostbite engine.
I still see no incentive to dump 60€ into this game for a couple new maps, a few smaller upgrades to the engine and a minor GUI change.
Anyway, let's see what they unveil at E3 about MP to see what's new and what's not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 35 of 439 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
