| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 7th Jul 2013 21:47 Post subject: Asus VG278H Monitor : Yay or Nay ? |
|
 |
Anybody has or had experience with this monitor ?
Is it worthed ?
http://www.asus.com/Monitors_Projectors/VG278H/
Thanks
Lian-Li XL Dynamic ROG Black - EVGA 1000w - Lian-li Galahad 360 AIO - MSI X570 Meg Ace - Rysen 5950x - G.Skill 4x16GB CL14 3600@3800(14-15-15-34) - Samsung 960 Pro 512 - Samsung 960 Pro 1TB - Kingston HyperX SSD 120gb SATA 3 (6gb/s) - WD Black Caviar 2x 2TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) Raid 0 - WD Black Caviar 2 TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) - EVGA 3090 FTW3 - LG C1 48" 4k120hrz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Sun, 7th Jul 2013 22:01 Post subject: |
|
|
Should be one of the better 120Hz displays out there, not that I have used it myself.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 7th Jul 2013 23:33 Post subject: |
|
|
I have the VX238H and its looks vivid. 60hz though but 1ms response time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 8th Jul 2013 07:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 03:18; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 8th Jul 2013 08:31 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 8th Jul 2013 11:15 Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer 16:10, maybe just used to that size.
For games I have a 16:9 sure but that's a plasma Tv connected to pc it's not a monitor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Mon, 8th Jul 2013 15:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| Interinactive wrote: | I have a ASUS PB278Q, I wouldn't get that garbage for any reason unless I couldn't afford something better
If you're apart of the ZOMG reponze timez are tottelly noticzable + teh gaming monitorz crowd then I think you already have your answer |
So clueless!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 17:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| Stige wrote: | | You shall be forever doomed in here with those words! People on NFOHump don't seem to like people that like 120Hz monitors here for some reason.. |
| Stige wrote: | I doubt there is THAT MUCH difference with 144Hz over 120Hz 
But I won't judge like *ermm* IPS PEOPLE *erm* do /tinfoilhat |
No, some of us prefer IPS because we don't want to sacrifice that much image quality. Then we recommend an IPS monitor and in comes barging the likes of you who dismiss image quality completely. You're the one who keeps going HURRRRR 120 HZ IS SO MUCH BETTER FOR GAEMZ, IT MAEK 30 FPS LOOK SMOOTH BLABLABLABLA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 17:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty much.
I have nothing against 120hz. The problem is that the current panel technology that does 120hz results in laughable image quality, and poor viewing angles.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 18:58 Post subject: |
|
|
It's the same shit as 3D, for which 120 Hz is most commonly used. For me, 3D does absolutely *nothing*. Not even in cinemas does it really work on me (no IMAX around here though, only good old crappy 3D).
It's just highly personal, period. What's better for one person, isn't necessarily better for another person. Now until we get to the point where we get quality IPS at high refresh rates (soon™), that's when you can really say it's better, as that'll have the best of both. As it stands, it's less ghosting versus image quality. Input lag is already negligible on any half-decent monitor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 20:39 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 20:41 Post subject: |
|
|
50 participants, 1 game 
Edit: oh, it's hardware.info, figures. "We disabled Vsync in this game running on an engine from last century" -> "They noticed less tearing on 120 Hz". 
Throw in some RPGs, see if anyone gives a fuck then. Get BF3 and have it run at or below 60 FPS, see if anyone cares. And you need more people to begin with to draw any valid conclusion.
It's a subjective matter based entirely on what you do or don't play.
Anyway, glad you enjoy your monitor, sorry to have derailed the thread. Shouldn't have gone for Stige's bait 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Tue, 9th Jul 2013 21:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| Werelds wrote: | 50 participants, 1 game
Edit: oh, it's hardware.info, figures. "We disabled Vsync in this game running on an engine from last century" -> "They noticed less tearing on 120 Hz".
Throw in some RPGs, see if anyone gives a fuck then. Get BF3 and have it run at or below 60 FPS, see if anyone cares. And you need more people to begin with to draw any valid conclusion.
It's a subjective matter based entirely on what you do or don't play.
Anyway, glad you enjoy your monitor, sorry to have derailed the thread. Shouldn't have gone for Stige's bait |
Lol, plz no h8 :<
I don't play any FPS games but I still highly prefer 120Hz monitors, only games I really play are WoW (which is pretty fast paced for arenas, only thing I do) and TERA.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3544
Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
My next monitor will be a 1440p IPS with 120hz (korean monitors)
